Is the pulsed xenon ultraviolet light no-touch disinfection system effective on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the absence of manual cleaning?

Chetan Jinadatha, Frank C. Villamaria, Marcos Restrepo, Nagaraja Ganachari-Mallappa, I. Chia Liao, Eileen M. Stock, Laurel A. Copeland, John E. Zeber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been shown to survive on ambient surfaces for extended periods of time. Leftover MRSA environmental contamination in a hospital room places future patients at risk. Manual disinfection supplemented by pulsed xenon ultraviolet (PX-UV) light disinfection has been shown to greatly decrease the MRSA bioburden in hospital rooms. However, the effect of PX-UV in the absence of manual disinfection has not been evaluated. Methods Rooms that were previously occupied by a MRSA-positive patient (current colonization or infection) were selected for the study immediately postdischarge. Five high-touch surfaces were sampled, before and after PX-UV disinfection, in each hospital room. The effectiveness of the PX-UV device on the concentration of MRSA was assessed employing a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for all 70 samples with MRSA in 14 rooms, as well as by surface location. Results The final analysis included 14 rooms. Before PX-UV disinfection there were a total of 393 MRSA colonies isolated from the 5 high-touch surfaces. There were 100 MRSA colonies after disinfection by the PX-UV device and the overall reduction was statistically significant (P <.01). Conclusions Our study results suggest that PX-UV light effectively reduces MRSA colony counts in the absence of manual disinfection. These findings are important for hospital and environmental services supervisors who plan to adapt new technologies as an adjunct to routine manual disinfection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)878-881
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume43
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Xenon
Disinfection
Touch
Ultraviolet Rays
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Equipment and Supplies
Nonparametric Statistics
Technology

Keywords

  • Environmental contamination
  • High touch surfaces
  • Hospital-acquired infections
  • Supplemental terminal cleaning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Is the pulsed xenon ultraviolet light no-touch disinfection system effective on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the absence of manual cleaning? / Jinadatha, Chetan; Villamaria, Frank C.; Restrepo, Marcos; Ganachari-Mallappa, Nagaraja; Liao, I. Chia; Stock, Eileen M.; Copeland, Laurel A.; Zeber, John E.

In: American Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 43, No. 8, 01.08.2015, p. 878-881.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jinadatha, Chetan ; Villamaria, Frank C. ; Restrepo, Marcos ; Ganachari-Mallappa, Nagaraja ; Liao, I. Chia ; Stock, Eileen M. ; Copeland, Laurel A. ; Zeber, John E. / Is the pulsed xenon ultraviolet light no-touch disinfection system effective on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the absence of manual cleaning?. In: American Journal of Infection Control. 2015 ; Vol. 43, No. 8. pp. 878-881.
@article{989f696a7dd94c71a991513d10bdb5e5,
title = "Is the pulsed xenon ultraviolet light no-touch disinfection system effective on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the absence of manual cleaning?",
abstract = "Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been shown to survive on ambient surfaces for extended periods of time. Leftover MRSA environmental contamination in a hospital room places future patients at risk. Manual disinfection supplemented by pulsed xenon ultraviolet (PX-UV) light disinfection has been shown to greatly decrease the MRSA bioburden in hospital rooms. However, the effect of PX-UV in the absence of manual disinfection has not been evaluated. Methods Rooms that were previously occupied by a MRSA-positive patient (current colonization or infection) were selected for the study immediately postdischarge. Five high-touch surfaces were sampled, before and after PX-UV disinfection, in each hospital room. The effectiveness of the PX-UV device on the concentration of MRSA was assessed employing a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for all 70 samples with MRSA in 14 rooms, as well as by surface location. Results The final analysis included 14 rooms. Before PX-UV disinfection there were a total of 393 MRSA colonies isolated from the 5 high-touch surfaces. There were 100 MRSA colonies after disinfection by the PX-UV device and the overall reduction was statistically significant (P <.01). Conclusions Our study results suggest that PX-UV light effectively reduces MRSA colony counts in the absence of manual disinfection. These findings are important for hospital and environmental services supervisors who plan to adapt new technologies as an adjunct to routine manual disinfection.",
keywords = "Environmental contamination, High touch surfaces, Hospital-acquired infections, Supplemental terminal cleaning",
author = "Chetan Jinadatha and Villamaria, {Frank C.} and Marcos Restrepo and Nagaraja Ganachari-Mallappa and Liao, {I. Chia} and Stock, {Eileen M.} and Copeland, {Laurel A.} and Zeber, {John E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "878--881",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0196-6553",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the pulsed xenon ultraviolet light no-touch disinfection system effective on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the absence of manual cleaning?

AU - Jinadatha, Chetan

AU - Villamaria, Frank C.

AU - Restrepo, Marcos

AU - Ganachari-Mallappa, Nagaraja

AU - Liao, I. Chia

AU - Stock, Eileen M.

AU - Copeland, Laurel A.

AU - Zeber, John E.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been shown to survive on ambient surfaces for extended periods of time. Leftover MRSA environmental contamination in a hospital room places future patients at risk. Manual disinfection supplemented by pulsed xenon ultraviolet (PX-UV) light disinfection has been shown to greatly decrease the MRSA bioburden in hospital rooms. However, the effect of PX-UV in the absence of manual disinfection has not been evaluated. Methods Rooms that were previously occupied by a MRSA-positive patient (current colonization or infection) were selected for the study immediately postdischarge. Five high-touch surfaces were sampled, before and after PX-UV disinfection, in each hospital room. The effectiveness of the PX-UV device on the concentration of MRSA was assessed employing a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for all 70 samples with MRSA in 14 rooms, as well as by surface location. Results The final analysis included 14 rooms. Before PX-UV disinfection there were a total of 393 MRSA colonies isolated from the 5 high-touch surfaces. There were 100 MRSA colonies after disinfection by the PX-UV device and the overall reduction was statistically significant (P <.01). Conclusions Our study results suggest that PX-UV light effectively reduces MRSA colony counts in the absence of manual disinfection. These findings are important for hospital and environmental services supervisors who plan to adapt new technologies as an adjunct to routine manual disinfection.

AB - Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been shown to survive on ambient surfaces for extended periods of time. Leftover MRSA environmental contamination in a hospital room places future patients at risk. Manual disinfection supplemented by pulsed xenon ultraviolet (PX-UV) light disinfection has been shown to greatly decrease the MRSA bioburden in hospital rooms. However, the effect of PX-UV in the absence of manual disinfection has not been evaluated. Methods Rooms that were previously occupied by a MRSA-positive patient (current colonization or infection) were selected for the study immediately postdischarge. Five high-touch surfaces were sampled, before and after PX-UV disinfection, in each hospital room. The effectiveness of the PX-UV device on the concentration of MRSA was assessed employing a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for all 70 samples with MRSA in 14 rooms, as well as by surface location. Results The final analysis included 14 rooms. Before PX-UV disinfection there were a total of 393 MRSA colonies isolated from the 5 high-touch surfaces. There were 100 MRSA colonies after disinfection by the PX-UV device and the overall reduction was statistically significant (P <.01). Conclusions Our study results suggest that PX-UV light effectively reduces MRSA colony counts in the absence of manual disinfection. These findings are important for hospital and environmental services supervisors who plan to adapt new technologies as an adjunct to routine manual disinfection.

KW - Environmental contamination

KW - High touch surfaces

KW - Hospital-acquired infections

KW - Supplemental terminal cleaning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938289666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938289666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.005

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 878

EP - 881

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0196-6553

IS - 8

ER -