Interpretation of the dosimetric results of three uniformity regularization methods in terms of expected treatment outcome

Panayiotis Mavroidis, Georgios Komisopoulos, Bengt K. Lind, Nikos Papanikolaou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In IMRT treatment plan optimization there are various methods that try to regularize the variation of dose nonuniformity using purely dosimetric measures. However, although these methods can help in finding a good dose distribution, they do not provide any information regarding the expected treatment outcome. When a treatment plan optimization is performed using biological measures, the final goal should be some indication about the expected tumor control or normal tissue complications, which is the primary goal of treatment planning (the association of treatment configurations and dose prescription with the treatment outcome). In this study, this issue is analyzed distinguishing the dose-oriented treatment plan optimization from the response-oriented optimization. Three different dose distributions were obtained by using a dose-based optimization technique, an EUD-based optimization without applying any technique for regularizing the nonuniformity of the dose distribution, and an EUD-based optimization using a variational regularization technique, which controls dose nonuniformity. The clinical effectiveness of the three dose distributions was investigated by calculating the response probabilities of the tumors and organs-at-risk (OARs) involved in two head and neck and prostate cancer cases. The radiobiological models used are the linear-quadratic-Poisson and the Relative Seriality models. Furthermore, the complication-free tumor control probability and the biologically effective uniform dose (D=) were used for treatment plan evaluation and comparison. The radiobiological comparison shows that the EUD-based optimization using L -curve regularization gives better results than the EUD-based optimization without regularization and dose-based optimization in both clinical cases. Concluding, it appears that the applied dose nonuniformity regularization technique is expected to improve the effectiveness of the optimized IMRT dose distributions. However, more patient cases are needed to validate the statistical significance of the results and conclusions presented in this paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5009-5018
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Physics
Volume35
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Organs at Risk
Therapeutics
Neoplasms
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Prescriptions
Linear Models
Prostatic Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Interpretation of the dosimetric results of three uniformity regularization methods in terms of expected treatment outcome. / Mavroidis, Panayiotis; Komisopoulos, Georgios; Lind, Bengt K.; Papanikolaou, Nikos.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 35, No. 11, 2008, p. 5009-5018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mavroidis, Panayiotis ; Komisopoulos, Georgios ; Lind, Bengt K. ; Papanikolaou, Nikos. / Interpretation of the dosimetric results of three uniformity regularization methods in terms of expected treatment outcome. In: Medical Physics. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 11. pp. 5009-5018.
@article{1740e7a6496a413f9d43ec64f268c449,
title = "Interpretation of the dosimetric results of three uniformity regularization methods in terms of expected treatment outcome",
abstract = "In IMRT treatment plan optimization there are various methods that try to regularize the variation of dose nonuniformity using purely dosimetric measures. However, although these methods can help in finding a good dose distribution, they do not provide any information regarding the expected treatment outcome. When a treatment plan optimization is performed using biological measures, the final goal should be some indication about the expected tumor control or normal tissue complications, which is the primary goal of treatment planning (the association of treatment configurations and dose prescription with the treatment outcome). In this study, this issue is analyzed distinguishing the dose-oriented treatment plan optimization from the response-oriented optimization. Three different dose distributions were obtained by using a dose-based optimization technique, an EUD-based optimization without applying any technique for regularizing the nonuniformity of the dose distribution, and an EUD-based optimization using a variational regularization technique, which controls dose nonuniformity. The clinical effectiveness of the three dose distributions was investigated by calculating the response probabilities of the tumors and organs-at-risk (OARs) involved in two head and neck and prostate cancer cases. The radiobiological models used are the linear-quadratic-Poisson and the Relative Seriality models. Furthermore, the complication-free tumor control probability and the biologically effective uniform dose (D=) were used for treatment plan evaluation and comparison. The radiobiological comparison shows that the EUD-based optimization using L -curve regularization gives better results than the EUD-based optimization without regularization and dose-based optimization in both clinical cases. Concluding, it appears that the applied dose nonuniformity regularization technique is expected to improve the effectiveness of the optimized IMRT dose distributions. However, more patient cases are needed to validate the statistical significance of the results and conclusions presented in this paper.",
author = "Panayiotis Mavroidis and Georgios Komisopoulos and Lind, {Bengt K.} and Nikos Papanikolaou",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1118/1.2995760",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "5009--5018",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretation of the dosimetric results of three uniformity regularization methods in terms of expected treatment outcome

AU - Mavroidis, Panayiotis

AU - Komisopoulos, Georgios

AU - Lind, Bengt K.

AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In IMRT treatment plan optimization there are various methods that try to regularize the variation of dose nonuniformity using purely dosimetric measures. However, although these methods can help in finding a good dose distribution, they do not provide any information regarding the expected treatment outcome. When a treatment plan optimization is performed using biological measures, the final goal should be some indication about the expected tumor control or normal tissue complications, which is the primary goal of treatment planning (the association of treatment configurations and dose prescription with the treatment outcome). In this study, this issue is analyzed distinguishing the dose-oriented treatment plan optimization from the response-oriented optimization. Three different dose distributions were obtained by using a dose-based optimization technique, an EUD-based optimization without applying any technique for regularizing the nonuniformity of the dose distribution, and an EUD-based optimization using a variational regularization technique, which controls dose nonuniformity. The clinical effectiveness of the three dose distributions was investigated by calculating the response probabilities of the tumors and organs-at-risk (OARs) involved in two head and neck and prostate cancer cases. The radiobiological models used are the linear-quadratic-Poisson and the Relative Seriality models. Furthermore, the complication-free tumor control probability and the biologically effective uniform dose (D=) were used for treatment plan evaluation and comparison. The radiobiological comparison shows that the EUD-based optimization using L -curve regularization gives better results than the EUD-based optimization without regularization and dose-based optimization in both clinical cases. Concluding, it appears that the applied dose nonuniformity regularization technique is expected to improve the effectiveness of the optimized IMRT dose distributions. However, more patient cases are needed to validate the statistical significance of the results and conclusions presented in this paper.

AB - In IMRT treatment plan optimization there are various methods that try to regularize the variation of dose nonuniformity using purely dosimetric measures. However, although these methods can help in finding a good dose distribution, they do not provide any information regarding the expected treatment outcome. When a treatment plan optimization is performed using biological measures, the final goal should be some indication about the expected tumor control or normal tissue complications, which is the primary goal of treatment planning (the association of treatment configurations and dose prescription with the treatment outcome). In this study, this issue is analyzed distinguishing the dose-oriented treatment plan optimization from the response-oriented optimization. Three different dose distributions were obtained by using a dose-based optimization technique, an EUD-based optimization without applying any technique for regularizing the nonuniformity of the dose distribution, and an EUD-based optimization using a variational regularization technique, which controls dose nonuniformity. The clinical effectiveness of the three dose distributions was investigated by calculating the response probabilities of the tumors and organs-at-risk (OARs) involved in two head and neck and prostate cancer cases. The radiobiological models used are the linear-quadratic-Poisson and the Relative Seriality models. Furthermore, the complication-free tumor control probability and the biologically effective uniform dose (D=) were used for treatment plan evaluation and comparison. The radiobiological comparison shows that the EUD-based optimization using L -curve regularization gives better results than the EUD-based optimization without regularization and dose-based optimization in both clinical cases. Concluding, it appears that the applied dose nonuniformity regularization technique is expected to improve the effectiveness of the optimized IMRT dose distributions. However, more patient cases are needed to validate the statistical significance of the results and conclusions presented in this paper.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54949138112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54949138112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2995760

DO - 10.1118/1.2995760

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 5009

EP - 5018

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 11

ER -