TY - JOUR
T1 - International Validation of the Erasmus Guillain–Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score
AU - the IGOS Consortium
AU - Doets, Alex Y.
AU - Walgaard, Christa
AU - Lingsma, Hester F.
AU - Islam, Badrul
AU - Papri, Nowshin
AU - Yamagishi, Yuko
AU - Kusunoki, Susumu
AU - Dimachkie, Mazen M.
AU - Waheed, Waqar
AU - Kolb, Noah
AU - Gorson, Kenneth C.
AU - Jacobs, Bart C.
AU - Islam, Zhahirul
AU - Mohammad, Quazi Deen
AU - Harbo, Thomas
AU - Sindrup, Soren H.
AU - Chavada, Govindsinh
AU - Davidson, Amy
AU - Willison, Hugh J.
AU - Casasnovas, Carlos
AU - Bateman, Kathleen
AU - Miller, James A.L.
AU - van Doorn, Pieter A.
AU - van den Berg, Bianca
AU - Verboon, Christine
AU - Roodbol, Joyce
AU - Leonhard, Sonja E.
AU - Arends, Samuel
AU - Luijten, Linda
AU - Benedetti, Luana
AU - Kuwabara, Satoshi
AU - den Bergh, Peter Van
AU - Monges, Soledad
AU - Marfia, Girolama A.
AU - Shahrizaila, Nortina
AU - Galassi, Giuliana
AU - Pereon, Yann
AU - Bürmann, Jan
AU - Kuitwaard, Krista
AU - Kleyweg, Ruud P.
AU - Marchesoni, Cintia
AU - Sedano Tous, María J.
AU - Querol, Luis
AU - Wang, Yuzhong
AU - Nobile-Orazio, Eduardo
AU - Rinaldi, Simon
AU - Schenone, Angelo
AU - Pardo, Julio
AU - Vermeij, Frederique H.
AU - Bhavaraju-Sanka, R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The IGOS study is funded by the GBS‐CIDP Foundation International, gain, Erasmus University Medical Center, Glasgow University, CSL Behring, Grifols, Annexon, and Hansa.
Funding Information:
The IGOS study is funded by the GBS-CIDP Foundation International, gain, Erasmus University Medical Center, Glasgow University, CSL Behring, Grifols, Annexon, and Hansa. We thank the patients who participated in this long-term follow-up study, and K. Duong for her extensive work in the data management of the IGOS clinical database.Several authors of this publication are members of the Netherlands Neuromuscular Center and the European Reference Network for Rare Neuromuscular Diseases.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Objective: This study aimed to validate the Erasmus Guillain–Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score in the International Guillain–Barré Syndrome Outcome Study cohort, and to improve its performance and region-specificity. Methods: We examined data from the first 1,500 included patients, aged ≥6 years and not ventilated prior to study entry. Patients with a clinical variant or mild symptoms were also included. Outcome was mechanical ventilation within the first week from study entry. Model performance was assessed regarding the discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) and the calibration (observed vs predicted probability of mechanical ventilation), in the full cohort and in Europe/North America and Asia separately. We recalibrated the model to improve its performance and region-specificity. Results: In the group of 1,023 eligible patients (Europe/North America n = 842, Asia n = 104, other n = 77), 104 (10%) required mechanical ventilation within the first week from study entry. Area under the curve values were ≥0.80 for all validation subgroups. Mean observed proportions of mechanical ventilation were lower than predicted risks: full cohort 10% versus 21%, Europe/North America 9% versus 21%, and Asia 17% versus 23%. After recalibration, predicted risks for the full cohort and Europe/North America corresponded to observed proportions. Interpretation: This prospective, international cohort study validated the Erasmus Guillain–Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score, and showed that the model can be used in the full spectrum of Guillain–Barré syndrome patients. In addition, a more accurate, region-specific version of the model was developed for patients from Europe/North America. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:521–531.
AB - Objective: This study aimed to validate the Erasmus Guillain–Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score in the International Guillain–Barré Syndrome Outcome Study cohort, and to improve its performance and region-specificity. Methods: We examined data from the first 1,500 included patients, aged ≥6 years and not ventilated prior to study entry. Patients with a clinical variant or mild symptoms were also included. Outcome was mechanical ventilation within the first week from study entry. Model performance was assessed regarding the discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) and the calibration (observed vs predicted probability of mechanical ventilation), in the full cohort and in Europe/North America and Asia separately. We recalibrated the model to improve its performance and region-specificity. Results: In the group of 1,023 eligible patients (Europe/North America n = 842, Asia n = 104, other n = 77), 104 (10%) required mechanical ventilation within the first week from study entry. Area under the curve values were ≥0.80 for all validation subgroups. Mean observed proportions of mechanical ventilation were lower than predicted risks: full cohort 10% versus 21%, Europe/North America 9% versus 21%, and Asia 17% versus 23%. After recalibration, predicted risks for the full cohort and Europe/North America corresponded to observed proportions. Interpretation: This prospective, international cohort study validated the Erasmus Guillain–Barré Syndrome Respiratory Insufficiency Score, and showed that the model can be used in the full spectrum of Guillain–Barré syndrome patients. In addition, a more accurate, region-specific version of the model was developed for patients from Europe/North America. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:521–531.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127729632&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127729632&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ana.26312
DO - 10.1002/ana.26312
M3 - Article
C2 - 35106830
AN - SCOPUS:85127729632
SN - 0364-5134
VL - 91
SP - 521
EP - 531
JO - Annals of neurology
JF - Annals of neurology
IS - 4
ER -