Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International Medical Graduates are Comparable to American Medical Graduates as General Surgery Interns

  • Aashish Rajesh
  • , Malke Asaad
  • , Yazan N. AlJamal
  • , Rafael U. Azevedo
  • , John M. Stulak
  • , Stephanie F. Heller
  • , Mariela Rivera
  • , David R. Farley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: International medical graduates (IMGs) are often relegated to preliminary positions in general surgery (GS) owing to uncertainties about the candidate's performance in the American healthcare setting. We aimed to determine the comparative performance of IMGs and American medical graduates (AMGs) at baseline and assess these trends over the course of their GS internship. Methods: Evaluations of all IMG preliminary and AMG categorical interns from 2013 to 2017 at our GS residency program were obtained from three faculty members to score overall performance, technical skills, interpersonal communication, and medical knowledge on a 10-point Likert scale. Scores on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam, an in-house preparation test, United States Medical Licensing Exam, and performance during the biannual multistation objective assessments were compared between the two resident groups. Results: Seventy-two interns (28 [39%] AMG categorical and 44 [61%] IMG preliminary) met inclusion criteria. The AMG group had significantly higher median Step 1 and Step 2 scores compared with our IMG group (243 versus 231, P = 0.002, and 250 versus 246, P = 0.03, respectively).Although in-house preparation test scores were higher among IMGs (median [interquartile range] of 36 [33-40] among AMGs and 38 [34-45] among IMGs; P = 0.002), there were no statistically significant differences between the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam scores of the two groups. The median scores for the four faculty evaluation components were similar between the AMG (7, 8, 7, 7) and IMG resident groups (7, 7, 7, 7; P = nonsignificant). IMGs scored significantly higher in both biannual multistation objective assessments than AMGs (median [interquartile range] July: 59 [47-91] versus 55 [37-62], P = 0.005; January: 103 [86-116] versus 91 [87-104], P = 0.03). Conclusions: It is reassuring to confirm that no matter where they are from, great candidates can perform well as surgical interns in a GS training program.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)239-245
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume258
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ABSITE
  • American medical graduate
  • General surgery residency
  • International medical graduate
  • Internship
  • Performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Medical Graduates are Comparable to American Medical Graduates as General Surgery Interns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this