TY - JOUR
T1 - Initiating Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in Community Settings
T2 - A Qualitative Investigation of Therapist Decision-Making
AU - Thomas, Fiona C.
AU - Loskot, Taylor
AU - Mutschler, Christina
AU - Burdo, Jessica
AU - Lagdamen, Jansey
AU - Sijercic, Iris
AU - Lane, Jeanine E.M.
AU - Liebman, Rachel E.
AU - Finley, Erin P.
AU - Monson, Candice M.
AU - Wiltsey-Stirman, Shannon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Various organizations have provided treatment guidelines intended to aid therapists in deciding how to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Yet evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for PTSD in the community may be difficult to obtain. Although strides have been made to implement EBPs for PTSD in institutional settings such as the United States Veterans Affairs, community uptake remains low. Factors surrounding clients’ decisions to enroll in EBPs have been identified in some settings; however less is known regarding trained therapists’ decisions related to offering trauma-focused therapies or alternative treatment options. Thus, the aim of the current study was to examine therapist motivations to initiate CPT in community settings. The present study utilizes data from a larger investigation aiming to support the sustained implementation of Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in community mental health treatment settings. Enrolled therapists participated in phone interviews discussing their opinions of CPT, preferred treatments for PTSD, and process in assessing appropriate PTSD treatments for clients. Semi-structured interviews (N = 29) were transcribed and analyzed using a directed content analysis approach. Several themes emerged regarding therapists’ decision-making in selecting PTSD treatments. Therapist motivations to use EBPs for PTSD, primarily CPT, were identified at the client (e.g., perceived compatibility with client-level characteristics), therapist (e.g., time limitations), and clinic levels (e.g., leadership support). The results provide insight into the complex array of factors that affect sustainability of EBPs for PTSD in community settings and inform future dissemination of EBPs, including training efforts in community settings.
AB - Various organizations have provided treatment guidelines intended to aid therapists in deciding how to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Yet evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for PTSD in the community may be difficult to obtain. Although strides have been made to implement EBPs for PTSD in institutional settings such as the United States Veterans Affairs, community uptake remains low. Factors surrounding clients’ decisions to enroll in EBPs have been identified in some settings; however less is known regarding trained therapists’ decisions related to offering trauma-focused therapies or alternative treatment options. Thus, the aim of the current study was to examine therapist motivations to initiate CPT in community settings. The present study utilizes data from a larger investigation aiming to support the sustained implementation of Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in community mental health treatment settings. Enrolled therapists participated in phone interviews discussing their opinions of CPT, preferred treatments for PTSD, and process in assessing appropriate PTSD treatments for clients. Semi-structured interviews (N = 29) were transcribed and analyzed using a directed content analysis approach. Several themes emerged regarding therapists’ decision-making in selecting PTSD treatments. Therapist motivations to use EBPs for PTSD, primarily CPT, were identified at the client (e.g., perceived compatibility with client-level characteristics), therapist (e.g., time limitations), and clinic levels (e.g., leadership support). The results provide insight into the complex array of factors that affect sustainability of EBPs for PTSD in community settings and inform future dissemination of EBPs, including training efforts in community settings.
KW - Cognitive processing therapy
KW - Community mental health
KW - Community providers
KW - Decision-making
KW - Implementation
KW - Qualitative analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141662973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141662973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10488-022-01229-8
DO - 10.1007/s10488-022-01229-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 36370226
AN - SCOPUS:85141662973
SN - 0894-587X
VL - 50
SP - 137
EP - 150
JO - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
JF - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
IS - 1
ER -