Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: A radiographic study in the canine mandible

Gaston N. King, Joachim S. Hermann, John D. Schoofield, Daniel Busen, David L Cochran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

141 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that alveolar crestal bone resorption occurs as a result of the microgap that is present between the implant-abutment interface in dental implants. The objective of this longitudinal radiographic study was to determine whether the size of the interface or the microgap between the implant and abutment influences the amount of crestal bone loss in unloaded non-submerged implants. Methods: Sixty titanium implants having sandblasted with large grit, acid-etched (SLA) endosseous surfaces were placed in edentulous mandibular areas of 5 American fox hounds. Implant groups A, B, and C had a microgap between the implant-abutment connection of <10 μm, 50 μm, or 100 μm, respectively, as did groups D, E, and F, respectively. Abutments were either welded (1-piece) in groups A, B, and C or non-welded (2-piece screwed) in D, E, and F. All abutment interfaces were placed 1 mm above the alveolar crest. Radiographic assessment was undertaken to evaluate peri-implant crestal bone levels at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months after implant placement whereupon all animals were sacrificed. Results: The size of the microgap at the abutment/implant interface had no significant effect upon crestal bone loss. At 1 month, most implants developed crestal bone loss compared with baseline levels. However, during this early healing period, the non-welded group (D, E, and F) showed significantly greater crestal bone loss from baseline to one month (P <0.04) and 2 months (P <0.02) compared with the welded group (A, B, and C). No significant differences were observed between these 2 groups at 3 months (P >0.70). Conclusions: Crestal bone loss was an early manifestation of wound healing occurring after 1 month of implant placement. However, the size of the microgap at the implant-abutment interface had no significant effect upon crestal bone resorption. Thus, 2-piece non-welded implants showed significantly greater crestal bone loss compared with 1-piece welded implants after 1 and 2 months suggesting that the stability of the implant/abutment interface may have an important early role to play in determining crestal bone levels. At 3 months, this influence followed a similar trend but was not observed to be statistically significant. This finding implies that implant configurations incorporating interfaces will be associated with biological changes regardless of interface size and that mobility between components may have an early influence on wound healing around the implant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1111-1117
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Periodontology
Volume73
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2002

Fingerprint

Dental Implants
Mandible
Canidae
Bone and Bones
Bone Resorption
Wound Healing
Titanium
Longitudinal Studies
Acids

Keywords

  • Alveolar bone loss/etiology
  • Dental abutments
  • Dental implants
  • Endosseous
  • Follow-up studies
  • Wound healing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants : A radiographic study in the canine mandible. / King, Gaston N.; Hermann, Joachim S.; Schoofield, John D.; Busen, Daniel; Cochran, David L.

In: Journal of Periodontology, Vol. 73, No. 10, 01.10.2002, p. 1111-1117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

King, Gaston N. ; Hermann, Joachim S. ; Schoofield, John D. ; Busen, Daniel ; Cochran, David L. / Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants : A radiographic study in the canine mandible. In: Journal of Periodontology. 2002 ; Vol. 73, No. 10. pp. 1111-1117.
@article{460d4b5b65264af5941d45163c392a5a,
title = "Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: A radiographic study in the canine mandible",
abstract = "Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that alveolar crestal bone resorption occurs as a result of the microgap that is present between the implant-abutment interface in dental implants. The objective of this longitudinal radiographic study was to determine whether the size of the interface or the microgap between the implant and abutment influences the amount of crestal bone loss in unloaded non-submerged implants. Methods: Sixty titanium implants having sandblasted with large grit, acid-etched (SLA) endosseous surfaces were placed in edentulous mandibular areas of 5 American fox hounds. Implant groups A, B, and C had a microgap between the implant-abutment connection of <10 μm, 50 μm, or 100 μm, respectively, as did groups D, E, and F, respectively. Abutments were either welded (1-piece) in groups A, B, and C or non-welded (2-piece screwed) in D, E, and F. All abutment interfaces were placed 1 mm above the alveolar crest. Radiographic assessment was undertaken to evaluate peri-implant crestal bone levels at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months after implant placement whereupon all animals were sacrificed. Results: The size of the microgap at the abutment/implant interface had no significant effect upon crestal bone loss. At 1 month, most implants developed crestal bone loss compared with baseline levels. However, during this early healing period, the non-welded group (D, E, and F) showed significantly greater crestal bone loss from baseline to one month (P <0.04) and 2 months (P <0.02) compared with the welded group (A, B, and C). No significant differences were observed between these 2 groups at 3 months (P >0.70). Conclusions: Crestal bone loss was an early manifestation of wound healing occurring after 1 month of implant placement. However, the size of the microgap at the implant-abutment interface had no significant effect upon crestal bone resorption. Thus, 2-piece non-welded implants showed significantly greater crestal bone loss compared with 1-piece welded implants after 1 and 2 months suggesting that the stability of the implant/abutment interface may have an important early role to play in determining crestal bone levels. At 3 months, this influence followed a similar trend but was not observed to be statistically significant. This finding implies that implant configurations incorporating interfaces will be associated with biological changes regardless of interface size and that mobility between components may have an early influence on wound healing around the implant.",
keywords = "Alveolar bone loss/etiology, Dental abutments, Dental implants, Endosseous, Follow-up studies, Wound healing",
author = "King, {Gaston N.} and Hermann, {Joachim S.} and Schoofield, {John D.} and Daniel Busen and Cochran, {David L}",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1111",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "1111--1117",
journal = "Journal of Periodontology",
issn = "0022-3492",
publisher = "American Academy of Periodontology",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants

T2 - A radiographic study in the canine mandible

AU - King, Gaston N.

AU - Hermann, Joachim S.

AU - Schoofield, John D.

AU - Busen, Daniel

AU - Cochran, David L

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that alveolar crestal bone resorption occurs as a result of the microgap that is present between the implant-abutment interface in dental implants. The objective of this longitudinal radiographic study was to determine whether the size of the interface or the microgap between the implant and abutment influences the amount of crestal bone loss in unloaded non-submerged implants. Methods: Sixty titanium implants having sandblasted with large grit, acid-etched (SLA) endosseous surfaces were placed in edentulous mandibular areas of 5 American fox hounds. Implant groups A, B, and C had a microgap between the implant-abutment connection of <10 μm, 50 μm, or 100 μm, respectively, as did groups D, E, and F, respectively. Abutments were either welded (1-piece) in groups A, B, and C or non-welded (2-piece screwed) in D, E, and F. All abutment interfaces were placed 1 mm above the alveolar crest. Radiographic assessment was undertaken to evaluate peri-implant crestal bone levels at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months after implant placement whereupon all animals were sacrificed. Results: The size of the microgap at the abutment/implant interface had no significant effect upon crestal bone loss. At 1 month, most implants developed crestal bone loss compared with baseline levels. However, during this early healing period, the non-welded group (D, E, and F) showed significantly greater crestal bone loss from baseline to one month (P <0.04) and 2 months (P <0.02) compared with the welded group (A, B, and C). No significant differences were observed between these 2 groups at 3 months (P >0.70). Conclusions: Crestal bone loss was an early manifestation of wound healing occurring after 1 month of implant placement. However, the size of the microgap at the implant-abutment interface had no significant effect upon crestal bone resorption. Thus, 2-piece non-welded implants showed significantly greater crestal bone loss compared with 1-piece welded implants after 1 and 2 months suggesting that the stability of the implant/abutment interface may have an important early role to play in determining crestal bone levels. At 3 months, this influence followed a similar trend but was not observed to be statistically significant. This finding implies that implant configurations incorporating interfaces will be associated with biological changes regardless of interface size and that mobility between components may have an early influence on wound healing around the implant.

AB - Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that alveolar crestal bone resorption occurs as a result of the microgap that is present between the implant-abutment interface in dental implants. The objective of this longitudinal radiographic study was to determine whether the size of the interface or the microgap between the implant and abutment influences the amount of crestal bone loss in unloaded non-submerged implants. Methods: Sixty titanium implants having sandblasted with large grit, acid-etched (SLA) endosseous surfaces were placed in edentulous mandibular areas of 5 American fox hounds. Implant groups A, B, and C had a microgap between the implant-abutment connection of <10 μm, 50 μm, or 100 μm, respectively, as did groups D, E, and F, respectively. Abutments were either welded (1-piece) in groups A, B, and C or non-welded (2-piece screwed) in D, E, and F. All abutment interfaces were placed 1 mm above the alveolar crest. Radiographic assessment was undertaken to evaluate peri-implant crestal bone levels at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months after implant placement whereupon all animals were sacrificed. Results: The size of the microgap at the abutment/implant interface had no significant effect upon crestal bone loss. At 1 month, most implants developed crestal bone loss compared with baseline levels. However, during this early healing period, the non-welded group (D, E, and F) showed significantly greater crestal bone loss from baseline to one month (P <0.04) and 2 months (P <0.02) compared with the welded group (A, B, and C). No significant differences were observed between these 2 groups at 3 months (P >0.70). Conclusions: Crestal bone loss was an early manifestation of wound healing occurring after 1 month of implant placement. However, the size of the microgap at the implant-abutment interface had no significant effect upon crestal bone resorption. Thus, 2-piece non-welded implants showed significantly greater crestal bone loss compared with 1-piece welded implants after 1 and 2 months suggesting that the stability of the implant/abutment interface may have an important early role to play in determining crestal bone levels. At 3 months, this influence followed a similar trend but was not observed to be statistically significant. This finding implies that implant configurations incorporating interfaces will be associated with biological changes regardless of interface size and that mobility between components may have an early influence on wound healing around the implant.

KW - Alveolar bone loss/etiology

KW - Dental abutments

KW - Dental implants

KW - Endosseous

KW - Follow-up studies

KW - Wound healing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036775113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036775113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1111

DO - 10.1902/jop.2002.73.10.1111

M3 - Article

C2 - 12416767

AN - SCOPUS:0036775113

VL - 73

SP - 1111

EP - 1117

JO - Journal of Periodontology

JF - Journal of Periodontology

SN - 0022-3492

IS - 10

ER -