TY - JOUR
T1 - Inclusion of Caregivers in Veterans’ Care
T2 - A Critical Literature Review
AU - Boucher, Nathan A.
AU - Shepherd-Banigan, Megan
AU - McKenna, Kevin
AU - Delgado, Roxana E.
AU - Peacock, Kimberly
AU - Van Houtven, Courtney H.
AU - Van Noord, Megan
AU - Sperber, Nina R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by United Services Automobile Association (USAA) Insurance company. This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Change (ADAPT) (CIN 13-410), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by United Services Automobile Association (USAA) Insurance company. This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Change (ADAPT) (CIN 13-410), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - More direct inclusion of informal caregivers (i.e., family, friends) in patients’ care will make care more patient- and family-centered and has the potential to improve overall quality of care for patients. We need to understand what potentially comprises “inclusive care” so that we can define what “inclusive care” is and develop targets for care quality metrics. We conducted a critical literature review to identify key components of “caregiver inclusion.” Focusing on extant literature from 2005 to 2017, 35 papers met inclusion criteria. Directed content analysis with constant comparison was used to identify major themes related to a concept of “inclusive care.” Our analysis indicates that “inclusive care” entails five components: clear definition of caregiver role, system level policies for inclusion, explicit involvement of caregiver, provider assessment of caregiver capability, and mutuality in caregiver–provider communication. We discuss the evidence behind these five components using the Donabedian health care quality conceptual model.
AB - More direct inclusion of informal caregivers (i.e., family, friends) in patients’ care will make care more patient- and family-centered and has the potential to improve overall quality of care for patients. We need to understand what potentially comprises “inclusive care” so that we can define what “inclusive care” is and develop targets for care quality metrics. We conducted a critical literature review to identify key components of “caregiver inclusion.” Focusing on extant literature from 2005 to 2017, 35 papers met inclusion criteria. Directed content analysis with constant comparison was used to identify major themes related to a concept of “inclusive care.” Our analysis indicates that “inclusive care” entails five components: clear definition of caregiver role, system level policies for inclusion, explicit involvement of caregiver, provider assessment of caregiver capability, and mutuality in caregiver–provider communication. We discuss the evidence behind these five components using the Donabedian health care quality conceptual model.
KW - caregivers
KW - decision making
KW - health care delivery
KW - veterans
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088473775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088473775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1077558720944283
DO - 10.1177/1077558720944283
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32715922
AN - SCOPUS:85088473775
SN - 1077-5587
VL - 78
SP - 463
EP - 474
JO - Medical Care Research and Review
JF - Medical Care Research and Review
IS - 5
ER -