In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of corneal changes in acute endothelial rejection

Golshan Latifi, Ramon Katoozpour, Reza Ghaffari, Parisa Abdi, Maryam Kasiri, Sahar Berijani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the microstructural corneal changes during acute endothelial graft rejection and following treatment using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). Methods: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of severe acute endothelial graft rejection following penetrating keratoplasty were included in this study. IVCM was performed on the 1 st day the patient presented with rejection signs and at the time of clinical resolution. Results: Twenty-three patients were included in this study. Inflammatory cells appeared as dendritic cells (DCs) and less frequently, as non-DCs in basal epithelial and subbasal areas. Activated keratocytes (AKs) (type 1: large cells with visible cytoplasmic processes; type 2: elongated and spindle-shaped keratocytes) were visible in acute phase. Following resolution, type 1 AKs considerably reduced, but type 2 cells were more often persisted. Multiple types of keratic precipitates (KPs) were also visible in acute phase which resolved following resolution of rejection. Conclusions: Acute graft rejection was associated with an increase in the number of DCs, activation of keratocytes, and aggregation of various types of KPs. Inflammatory process subsided in almost all cases, but the IVCM changes did not return to normal early after clinical resolution of rejection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-297
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Current Ophthalmology
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Activated keratocytes
  • Graft rejection
  • In vivo confocal microscopy
  • Keratic precipitate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of corneal changes in acute endothelial rejection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this