In vitro dentin demineralization inhibition effects of an experimental fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent

Adriana Segura, Kevin J Donly, B. Quackenbush

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability of fluoride-releasing resins to inhibit dentin demineralization remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the caries inhibition of resin composite restorations with an experimental fluoridated hydroxyethyl methyl methacrylate (HEMA) and water wetting agent. Standardized Class V preparations were placed in 40 molars, the gingival margin placed below the cementoenamel junction. Two dentin primers (sodium fluoride, HEMA and water; HEMA and water) were placed in equal numbers of 20 preparations, then One-Step® Dental Adhesive (Bisco) was applied as recommended by the manufacturer, followed by the placement of a resin composite restoration. Amalgam restorations with no primer/adhesive were placed in 10 preparations and 10 preparations were restored by placing One-Step® Dental Adhesive, then resin composite. All teeth were subjected to an artificial caries challenge (pH 4-4) for 5 days. Results demonstrated the mean areas (μm2 ± s.d.) of demineralization 100 μm from the restoration/dentin margin to be: amalgam 5570 ± 873; One-Step® 7038 ± 2099; HEMA and water 6126 ± 634; fluoridated HEMA and water 3411 ± 593. ANOVA and Duncan's test (P < 0.05) demonstrated the fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent to have significantly less adjacent dentin demineralization than the other three groups. Eighty percent of HEMA and water wetting agent, 80% of One-Step® Dental Adhesive and 100% of amalgam restorations demonstrated wall lesions. One hundred percent of restorations with fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent demonstrated inhibition zones in adjacent dentin.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)532-537
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
Volume27
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2000

Fingerprint

Wetting Agents
Dentin
Water
Dental Cements
Composite Resins
Tooth Cervix
Sodium Fluoride
In Vitro Techniques
hydroxyethyl methacrylate
Fluorides
Adhesives
Analysis of Variance
Tooth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

@article{1abb7e6e0de144c891afda7fe2a907c9,
title = "In vitro dentin demineralization inhibition effects of an experimental fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent",
abstract = "The ability of fluoride-releasing resins to inhibit dentin demineralization remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the caries inhibition of resin composite restorations with an experimental fluoridated hydroxyethyl methyl methacrylate (HEMA) and water wetting agent. Standardized Class V preparations were placed in 40 molars, the gingival margin placed below the cementoenamel junction. Two dentin primers (sodium fluoride, HEMA and water; HEMA and water) were placed in equal numbers of 20 preparations, then One-Step{\circledR} Dental Adhesive (Bisco) was applied as recommended by the manufacturer, followed by the placement of a resin composite restoration. Amalgam restorations with no primer/adhesive were placed in 10 preparations and 10 preparations were restored by placing One-Step{\circledR} Dental Adhesive, then resin composite. All teeth were subjected to an artificial caries challenge (pH 4-4) for 5 days. Results demonstrated the mean areas (μm2 ± s.d.) of demineralization 100 μm from the restoration/dentin margin to be: amalgam 5570 ± 873; One-Step{\circledR} 7038 ± 2099; HEMA and water 6126 ± 634; fluoridated HEMA and water 3411 ± 593. ANOVA and Duncan's test (P < 0.05) demonstrated the fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent to have significantly less adjacent dentin demineralization than the other three groups. Eighty percent of HEMA and water wetting agent, 80{\%} of One-Step{\circledR} Dental Adhesive and 100{\%} of amalgam restorations demonstrated wall lesions. One hundred percent of restorations with fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent demonstrated inhibition zones in adjacent dentin.",
author = "Adriana Segura and Donly, {Kevin J} and B. Quackenbush",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "532--537",
journal = "Journal of Oral Rehabilitation",
issn = "0305-182X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In vitro dentin demineralization inhibition effects of an experimental fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent

AU - Segura, Adriana

AU - Donly, Kevin J

AU - Quackenbush, B.

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - The ability of fluoride-releasing resins to inhibit dentin demineralization remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the caries inhibition of resin composite restorations with an experimental fluoridated hydroxyethyl methyl methacrylate (HEMA) and water wetting agent. Standardized Class V preparations were placed in 40 molars, the gingival margin placed below the cementoenamel junction. Two dentin primers (sodium fluoride, HEMA and water; HEMA and water) were placed in equal numbers of 20 preparations, then One-Step® Dental Adhesive (Bisco) was applied as recommended by the manufacturer, followed by the placement of a resin composite restoration. Amalgam restorations with no primer/adhesive were placed in 10 preparations and 10 preparations were restored by placing One-Step® Dental Adhesive, then resin composite. All teeth were subjected to an artificial caries challenge (pH 4-4) for 5 days. Results demonstrated the mean areas (μm2 ± s.d.) of demineralization 100 μm from the restoration/dentin margin to be: amalgam 5570 ± 873; One-Step® 7038 ± 2099; HEMA and water 6126 ± 634; fluoridated HEMA and water 3411 ± 593. ANOVA and Duncan's test (P < 0.05) demonstrated the fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent to have significantly less adjacent dentin demineralization than the other three groups. Eighty percent of HEMA and water wetting agent, 80% of One-Step® Dental Adhesive and 100% of amalgam restorations demonstrated wall lesions. One hundred percent of restorations with fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent demonstrated inhibition zones in adjacent dentin.

AB - The ability of fluoride-releasing resins to inhibit dentin demineralization remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the caries inhibition of resin composite restorations with an experimental fluoridated hydroxyethyl methyl methacrylate (HEMA) and water wetting agent. Standardized Class V preparations were placed in 40 molars, the gingival margin placed below the cementoenamel junction. Two dentin primers (sodium fluoride, HEMA and water; HEMA and water) were placed in equal numbers of 20 preparations, then One-Step® Dental Adhesive (Bisco) was applied as recommended by the manufacturer, followed by the placement of a resin composite restoration. Amalgam restorations with no primer/adhesive were placed in 10 preparations and 10 preparations were restored by placing One-Step® Dental Adhesive, then resin composite. All teeth were subjected to an artificial caries challenge (pH 4-4) for 5 days. Results demonstrated the mean areas (μm2 ± s.d.) of demineralization 100 μm from the restoration/dentin margin to be: amalgam 5570 ± 873; One-Step® 7038 ± 2099; HEMA and water 6126 ± 634; fluoridated HEMA and water 3411 ± 593. ANOVA and Duncan's test (P < 0.05) demonstrated the fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent to have significantly less adjacent dentin demineralization than the other three groups. Eighty percent of HEMA and water wetting agent, 80% of One-Step® Dental Adhesive and 100% of amalgam restorations demonstrated wall lesions. One hundred percent of restorations with fluoridated HEMA and water wetting agent demonstrated inhibition zones in adjacent dentin.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034202319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034202319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10888281

AN - SCOPUS:0034202319

VL - 27

SP - 532

EP - 537

JO - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

SN - 0305-182X

IS - 6

ER -