TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving the detection and prediction of suicidal behavior among military personnel by measuring suicidal beliefs
T2 - An evaluation of the Suicide Cognitions Scale
AU - Bryan, Craig J.
AU - David Rudd, M.
AU - Wertenberger, Evelyn
AU - Etienne, Neysa
AU - Ray-Sannerud, Bobbie N.
AU - Morrow, Chad E.
AU - Peterson, Alan L.
AU - Young-Mccaughon, Stacey
N1 - Funding Information:
Craig Bryan, M. David Rudd, Alan Peterson, and Stacey Young-McCaughon report receiving grant funding from the Department of Defense. All other authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
This project was supported in part through research funding by the Department of Defense award #W81XWH-09-1-0569 (M. David Rudd, Principal Investigator). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policy of the U.S. Government, the Department of Defense, the U.S. Army, or the U.S. Air Force.
PY - 2014/4/20
Y1 - 2014/4/20
N2 - Background Newer approaches for understanding suicidal behavior suggest the assessment of suicide-specific beliefs and cognitions may improve the detection and prediction of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The Suicide Cognitions Scale (SCS) was developed to measure suicide-specific beliefs, but it has not been tested in a military setting. Methods Data were analyzed from two separate studies conducted at three military mental health clinics (one U.S. Army, two U.S. Air Force). Participants included 175 active duty Army personnel with acute suicidal ideation and/or a recent suicide attempt referred for a treatment study (Sample 1) and 151 active duty Air Force personnel receiving routine outpatient mental health care (Sample 2). In both samples, participants completed self-report measures and clinician-administered interviews. Follow-up suicide attempts were assessed via clinician-administered interview for Sample 1. Statistical analyses included confirmatory factor analysis, between-group comparisons by history of suicidality, and generalized regression modeling. Results Two latent factors were confirmed for the SCS: Unloveability and Unbearability. Each demonstrated good internal consistency, convergent validity, and divergent validity. Both scales significantly predicted current suicidal ideation (βs >0.316, ps <0.002) and significantly differentiated suicide attempts from nonsuicidal self-injury and control groups (F(6, 286)=9.801, p<0.001). Both scales significantly predicted future suicide attempts (AORs>1.07, ps <0.050) better than other risk factors. Limitations Self-report methodology, small sample sizes, predominantly male samples. Conclusions The SCS is a reliable and valid measure that predicts suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among military personnel better than other well-established risk factors.
AB - Background Newer approaches for understanding suicidal behavior suggest the assessment of suicide-specific beliefs and cognitions may improve the detection and prediction of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The Suicide Cognitions Scale (SCS) was developed to measure suicide-specific beliefs, but it has not been tested in a military setting. Methods Data were analyzed from two separate studies conducted at three military mental health clinics (one U.S. Army, two U.S. Air Force). Participants included 175 active duty Army personnel with acute suicidal ideation and/or a recent suicide attempt referred for a treatment study (Sample 1) and 151 active duty Air Force personnel receiving routine outpatient mental health care (Sample 2). In both samples, participants completed self-report measures and clinician-administered interviews. Follow-up suicide attempts were assessed via clinician-administered interview for Sample 1. Statistical analyses included confirmatory factor analysis, between-group comparisons by history of suicidality, and generalized regression modeling. Results Two latent factors were confirmed for the SCS: Unloveability and Unbearability. Each demonstrated good internal consistency, convergent validity, and divergent validity. Both scales significantly predicted current suicidal ideation (βs >0.316, ps <0.002) and significantly differentiated suicide attempts from nonsuicidal self-injury and control groups (F(6, 286)=9.801, p<0.001). Both scales significantly predicted future suicide attempts (AORs>1.07, ps <0.050) better than other risk factors. Limitations Self-report methodology, small sample sizes, predominantly male samples. Conclusions The SCS is a reliable and valid measure that predicts suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among military personnel better than other well-established risk factors.
KW - Fluid vulnerability theory
KW - Military
KW - Suicidal belief system
KW - Suicide
KW - Unbearability
KW - Unloveability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895524700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895524700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.021
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 24679384
AN - SCOPUS:84895524700
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 159
SP - 15
EP - 22
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
ER -