Improved characterization of combat injury

Howard R. Champion, John B. Holcomb, Mary M. Lawnick, Timothy Kelliher, Mary Ann Spott, Michael R. Galarneau, Donald H. Jenkins, Susan A. West, Judy Dye, Charles E. Wade, Brian J. Eastridge, Lorne H. Blackbourne, Ellen Kalin Shair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

103 Scopus citations


Background: Combat injury patterns differ from civilian trauma in that the former are largely explosion-related, comprising multiple mechanistic and fragment injuries and high-kinetic-energy bullets. Further, unlike civilians, U.S. armed forces combatants are usually heavily protected with helmets and Kevlar body armor with ceramic plate inserts. Searchable databases providing actionable, statistically valid knowledge of body surface entry wounds and resulting organ injury severity are essential to understanding combat trauma. Methods: Two tools were developed to address these unique aspects of combat injury: (1) the Surface Wound Mapping (SWM) database and Surface Wound Analysis Tool (SWAT) software that were developed to generate 3D density maps of point-of-surface wound entry and resultant anatomic injury severity; and (2) the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2005-Military that was developed by a panel of military trauma surgeons to account for multiple injury etiology from explosions and other high-kinetic- energy weapons. Combined data from the Joint Theater Trauma Registry, Navy/Marine Combat Trauma Registry, and the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System Mortality Trauma Registry were coded in AIS 2005-Military, entered into the SWM database, and analyzed for entrance site and wounding path. Results: When data on 1,151 patients, who had a total of 3,500 surface wounds and 12,889 injuries, were entered into SWM, surface wounds averaged 3.0 per casualty and injuries averaged 11.2 per casualty. Of the 3,500 surface wounds, 2,496 (71%) were entrance wounds with 6,631 (51%) associated internal injuries, with 2.2 entrance wounds and 5.8 associated injuries per casualty (some details cannot be given because of operational security). Crude deaths rates were calculated using Maximum AIS-Military. Conclusion: These new tools have been successfully implemented to describe combat injury, mortality, and distribution of wounds and associated injuries. AIS 2005-Military is a more precise assignment of severity to military injuries. SWM has brought data from all three combat registries together into one analyzable database. SWM and SWAT allow visualization of wounds and associated injuries by region on a 3D model of the body.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1139-1150
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2010


  • AIS 2005-Military
  • Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)
  • Combat casualty
  • Combat injury
  • Combat registry
  • Database
  • Injury
  • Maximum AIS (MAIS)
  • Maximum AIS Military (MAIS-Military)
  • Wounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Improved characterization of combat injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this