Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomes

Brian J Eastridge, George Costanzo, Donald Jenkins, Mary Ann Spott, Charles Wade, Dominique Greydanus, Stephen Flaherty, Joseph Rappold, James Dunne, John B. Holcomb, Lorne H. Blackbourne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The US military forces developed and implemented the Joint Theater Trauma System (JTTS) and Joint Theater Trauma Registry (JTTR) using US civilian trauma system models with the intent of improving outcomes after battlefield injury. Methods: The purpose of this analysis was to elaborate the impact of the JTTS. To quantify these achievements, the JTTR captured mechanism, acute physiology, diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome data on 23,250 injured patients admitted to deployed US military treatment facilities from July 2003 through July 2008 for analysis. Comparative analysis to civilian trauma systems was done using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Results: In contrast to civilian trauma systems with an 11.1% rate of penetrating injury, 68.3% of battlefield wounds were by penetrating mechanism. In the analyzed cohort, 23.3% of all patients had an Injury Severe Score (ISS) ≥16, which is similar to the civilian rate of 22.4%. In the military injury population, 66% of injuries were combat-related. In addition, in the military injury group, 21.8% had metabolic evidence of shock with a base deficit ≥5, 29.8% of patients required blood transfusion, and 6.4% of the total population of combat casualties required massive transfusion (>10 U red blood cells/24 hours). With this complex and severely injured population of battlefield injuries, the JTTS elements were used to recognize and remedy more than 60 trauma system issues requiring leadership and advocacy, education, research, and alterations in clinical care. Of particular importance to the trauma system was the implementation and tracking of performance improvement indicators and the dissemination of 27 evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). In particular, the damage control resuscitation guideline was associated with a decrease in mortality in the massively transfused from 32% pre-CPG to 21% post-CPG. As evidence of the effectiveness of the JTTS, a mortality rate of 5.2% after battlefield hospital admission is comparable to a case fatality rate of 4.3% reported in an age-matched cohort from the NTDB. Conclusions: JTTS initiatives contributed to improved survival after battlefield injury. The JTTS has set the standard of trauma care for the modern battlefield using contemporary systems-based methodologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)852-857
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume198
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Joints
Wounds and Injuries
Practice Guidelines
Registries
Mortality
Military Facilities
Databases
Population
Penetrating Wounds
Evidence-Based Practice
Standard of Care
Resuscitation
Blood Transfusion

Keywords

  • Combat
  • Injury
  • Military
  • Trauma
  • Trauma system
  • War

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Eastridge, B. J., Costanzo, G., Jenkins, D., Spott, M. A., Wade, C., Greydanus, D., ... Blackbourne, L. H. (2009). Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomes. American Journal of Surgery, 198(6), 852-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.029

Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomes. / Eastridge, Brian J; Costanzo, George; Jenkins, Donald; Spott, Mary Ann; Wade, Charles; Greydanus, Dominique; Flaherty, Stephen; Rappold, Joseph; Dunne, James; Holcomb, John B.; Blackbourne, Lorne H.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 198, No. 6, 12.2009, p. 852-857.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eastridge, BJ, Costanzo, G, Jenkins, D, Spott, MA, Wade, C, Greydanus, D, Flaherty, S, Rappold, J, Dunne, J, Holcomb, JB & Blackbourne, LH 2009, 'Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomes', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 198, no. 6, pp. 852-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.029
Eastridge BJ, Costanzo G, Jenkins D, Spott MA, Wade C, Greydanus D et al. Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomes. American Journal of Surgery. 2009 Dec;198(6):852-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.029
Eastridge, Brian J ; Costanzo, George ; Jenkins, Donald ; Spott, Mary Ann ; Wade, Charles ; Greydanus, Dominique ; Flaherty, Stephen ; Rappold, Joseph ; Dunne, James ; Holcomb, John B. ; Blackbourne, Lorne H. / Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomes. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 198, No. 6. pp. 852-857.
@article{cd64fbd1044c4a7095f4db41b5d34483,
title = "Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomes",
abstract = "Introduction: The US military forces developed and implemented the Joint Theater Trauma System (JTTS) and Joint Theater Trauma Registry (JTTR) using US civilian trauma system models with the intent of improving outcomes after battlefield injury. Methods: The purpose of this analysis was to elaborate the impact of the JTTS. To quantify these achievements, the JTTR captured mechanism, acute physiology, diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome data on 23,250 injured patients admitted to deployed US military treatment facilities from July 2003 through July 2008 for analysis. Comparative analysis to civilian trauma systems was done using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Results: In contrast to civilian trauma systems with an 11.1{\%} rate of penetrating injury, 68.3{\%} of battlefield wounds were by penetrating mechanism. In the analyzed cohort, 23.3{\%} of all patients had an Injury Severe Score (ISS) ≥16, which is similar to the civilian rate of 22.4{\%}. In the military injury population, 66{\%} of injuries were combat-related. In addition, in the military injury group, 21.8{\%} had metabolic evidence of shock with a base deficit ≥5, 29.8{\%} of patients required blood transfusion, and 6.4{\%} of the total population of combat casualties required massive transfusion (>10 U red blood cells/24 hours). With this complex and severely injured population of battlefield injuries, the JTTS elements were used to recognize and remedy more than 60 trauma system issues requiring leadership and advocacy, education, research, and alterations in clinical care. Of particular importance to the trauma system was the implementation and tracking of performance improvement indicators and the dissemination of 27 evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). In particular, the damage control resuscitation guideline was associated with a decrease in mortality in the massively transfused from 32{\%} pre-CPG to 21{\%} post-CPG. As evidence of the effectiveness of the JTTS, a mortality rate of 5.2{\%} after battlefield hospital admission is comparable to a case fatality rate of 4.3{\%} reported in an age-matched cohort from the NTDB. Conclusions: JTTS initiatives contributed to improved survival after battlefield injury. The JTTS has set the standard of trauma care for the modern battlefield using contemporary systems-based methodologies.",
keywords = "Combat, Injury, Military, Trauma, Trauma system, War",
author = "Eastridge, {Brian J} and George Costanzo and Donald Jenkins and Spott, {Mary Ann} and Charles Wade and Dominique Greydanus and Stephen Flaherty and Joseph Rappold and James Dunne and Holcomb, {John B.} and Blackbourne, {Lorne H.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "198",
pages = "852--857",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomes

AU - Eastridge, Brian J

AU - Costanzo, George

AU - Jenkins, Donald

AU - Spott, Mary Ann

AU - Wade, Charles

AU - Greydanus, Dominique

AU - Flaherty, Stephen

AU - Rappold, Joseph

AU - Dunne, James

AU - Holcomb, John B.

AU - Blackbourne, Lorne H.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Introduction: The US military forces developed and implemented the Joint Theater Trauma System (JTTS) and Joint Theater Trauma Registry (JTTR) using US civilian trauma system models with the intent of improving outcomes after battlefield injury. Methods: The purpose of this analysis was to elaborate the impact of the JTTS. To quantify these achievements, the JTTR captured mechanism, acute physiology, diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome data on 23,250 injured patients admitted to deployed US military treatment facilities from July 2003 through July 2008 for analysis. Comparative analysis to civilian trauma systems was done using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Results: In contrast to civilian trauma systems with an 11.1% rate of penetrating injury, 68.3% of battlefield wounds were by penetrating mechanism. In the analyzed cohort, 23.3% of all patients had an Injury Severe Score (ISS) ≥16, which is similar to the civilian rate of 22.4%. In the military injury population, 66% of injuries were combat-related. In addition, in the military injury group, 21.8% had metabolic evidence of shock with a base deficit ≥5, 29.8% of patients required blood transfusion, and 6.4% of the total population of combat casualties required massive transfusion (>10 U red blood cells/24 hours). With this complex and severely injured population of battlefield injuries, the JTTS elements were used to recognize and remedy more than 60 trauma system issues requiring leadership and advocacy, education, research, and alterations in clinical care. Of particular importance to the trauma system was the implementation and tracking of performance improvement indicators and the dissemination of 27 evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). In particular, the damage control resuscitation guideline was associated with a decrease in mortality in the massively transfused from 32% pre-CPG to 21% post-CPG. As evidence of the effectiveness of the JTTS, a mortality rate of 5.2% after battlefield hospital admission is comparable to a case fatality rate of 4.3% reported in an age-matched cohort from the NTDB. Conclusions: JTTS initiatives contributed to improved survival after battlefield injury. The JTTS has set the standard of trauma care for the modern battlefield using contemporary systems-based methodologies.

AB - Introduction: The US military forces developed and implemented the Joint Theater Trauma System (JTTS) and Joint Theater Trauma Registry (JTTR) using US civilian trauma system models with the intent of improving outcomes after battlefield injury. Methods: The purpose of this analysis was to elaborate the impact of the JTTS. To quantify these achievements, the JTTR captured mechanism, acute physiology, diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome data on 23,250 injured patients admitted to deployed US military treatment facilities from July 2003 through July 2008 for analysis. Comparative analysis to civilian trauma systems was done using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Results: In contrast to civilian trauma systems with an 11.1% rate of penetrating injury, 68.3% of battlefield wounds were by penetrating mechanism. In the analyzed cohort, 23.3% of all patients had an Injury Severe Score (ISS) ≥16, which is similar to the civilian rate of 22.4%. In the military injury population, 66% of injuries were combat-related. In addition, in the military injury group, 21.8% had metabolic evidence of shock with a base deficit ≥5, 29.8% of patients required blood transfusion, and 6.4% of the total population of combat casualties required massive transfusion (>10 U red blood cells/24 hours). With this complex and severely injured population of battlefield injuries, the JTTS elements were used to recognize and remedy more than 60 trauma system issues requiring leadership and advocacy, education, research, and alterations in clinical care. Of particular importance to the trauma system was the implementation and tracking of performance improvement indicators and the dissemination of 27 evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). In particular, the damage control resuscitation guideline was associated with a decrease in mortality in the massively transfused from 32% pre-CPG to 21% post-CPG. As evidence of the effectiveness of the JTTS, a mortality rate of 5.2% after battlefield hospital admission is comparable to a case fatality rate of 4.3% reported in an age-matched cohort from the NTDB. Conclusions: JTTS initiatives contributed to improved survival after battlefield injury. The JTTS has set the standard of trauma care for the modern battlefield using contemporary systems-based methodologies.

KW - Combat

KW - Injury

KW - Military

KW - Trauma

KW - Trauma system

KW - War

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71449118103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71449118103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.029

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.029

M3 - Article

VL - 198

SP - 852

EP - 857

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 6

ER -