Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of differences in glucose tolerance on the prevalence of a negative insulinogenic index

  • Mirjam V. Faulenbach
  • , Lorena A. Wright
  • , Carlos Lorenzo
  • , Kristina M. Utzschneider
  • , Julia H. Goedecke
  • , Wilfred Y. Fujimoto
  • , Edward J. Boyko
  • , Marguerite J. McNeely
  • , Donna L. Leonetti
  • , Steven M. Haffner
  • , Steven E. Kahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of a negative insulinogenic index (change in plasma insulin/change in plasma glucose from 0 to 30 min) from an oral glucose tolerance test according to glucose tolerance category. Materials and Methods: Data from the San Antonio Heart Study (n = 2494), Japanese American Community Diabetes Study (JACDS; n = 594) and Genetics of NIDDM Study (n = 1519) were examined. Glucose tolerance was defined by ADA criteria. Results: In the combined cohort, the prevalence of a negative insulinogenic index was significantly higher in diabetes 20/616 (3.2%) compared to normal glucose tolerance 43/2667 (1.6%) (p < 0.05). Longitudinally, in the JACDS cohort, the prevalence did not change from baseline (3/594; 0.5%) to 5 (4/505; 0.7%) and 10 years (8/426; 1.9%) (p = 0.9) and no subject had a repeat negative insulinogenic index. Conclusions: A negative insulinogenic index occurs at a low prevalence across glucose tolerance categories although more often in diabetes, but without recurrence over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)158-161
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Diabetes and Its Complications
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Glucose
  • Impaired glucose tolerance
  • Insulin
  • Insulinogenic index
  • Oral glucose tolerance test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of differences in glucose tolerance on the prevalence of a negative insulinogenic index'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this