TY - JOUR
T1 - Immediate switching of antidepressant therapy
T2 - Results from a clinical trial of duloxetine
AU - Wohlreich, Madelaine M.
AU - Mallinckrodt, Craig H.
AU - Watkin, John G.
AU - Wilson, Michael G.
AU - Greist, John H.
AU - Delgado, Pedro L.
AU - Fava, Maurizio
PY - 2005/10/1
Y1 - 2005/10/1
N2 - Background. Approximately half of all treated depressed patients fail to show adequate response to their initially prescribed antidepressant medication. Switching to another medication represents one possible next-step approach for nonresponsive or partially responsive patients. However, specific techniques for switching between antidepressants have not been well studied. We examined the efficacy and tolerability associated with a switch from a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or venlafaxine to duloxetine. Methods. All patients met criteria for major depressive disorder as defined in DSM-IV. Patients (N = 88) exhibiting suboptimal response or poor tolerability to their current antidepressant medication (citalopram 40 mg/d, escitalopram 20 mg/d, fluvoxamine 150 mg/d, paroxetine 40 mg/d, sertraline 150 mg/d, or venlafaxine 150 mg/d) were switched to duloxetine 60 mg once-daily (QD) without intermediate tapering or titration ("switching" group). A comparator group (N = 67), comprising patients not currently receiving antidepressant medication, initiated duloxetine therapy at 60 mg QD ("initiating" group). Safety assessments included comparisons of discontinuation rates, treatment-emergent adverse events, and changes in vital signs. Efficacy measures included the HAMD17, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), and the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scale. Results. The efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients did not differ significantly from that observed in untreated patients initiating duloxetine therapy (mean changes: HAMD17 total score: 12.3 vs. 12.6; HAMA: 9.36 vs. 9.55, CGI-S: 1.94 vs. 2.12, respectively). However, the rate of discontinuation due to adverse events among patients switched to duloxetine was significantly lower than that in patients initiating duloxetine therapy (4.5% vs. 17.9%, p = .008). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in 10% of patients in both treatment groups were nausea, headache, dry mouth, insomnia, and diarrhea. Patients switched to duloxetine reported significantly lower rates of nausea and fatigue compared with patients initiating duloxetine. Conclusions. In this study, the efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients was comparable to that observed in patients initiating duloxetine therapy. Immediate switching from an SSRI or venlafaxine to duloxetine (60 mg QD) was well tolerated.
AB - Background. Approximately half of all treated depressed patients fail to show adequate response to their initially prescribed antidepressant medication. Switching to another medication represents one possible next-step approach for nonresponsive or partially responsive patients. However, specific techniques for switching between antidepressants have not been well studied. We examined the efficacy and tolerability associated with a switch from a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or venlafaxine to duloxetine. Methods. All patients met criteria for major depressive disorder as defined in DSM-IV. Patients (N = 88) exhibiting suboptimal response or poor tolerability to their current antidepressant medication (citalopram 40 mg/d, escitalopram 20 mg/d, fluvoxamine 150 mg/d, paroxetine 40 mg/d, sertraline 150 mg/d, or venlafaxine 150 mg/d) were switched to duloxetine 60 mg once-daily (QD) without intermediate tapering or titration ("switching" group). A comparator group (N = 67), comprising patients not currently receiving antidepressant medication, initiated duloxetine therapy at 60 mg QD ("initiating" group). Safety assessments included comparisons of discontinuation rates, treatment-emergent adverse events, and changes in vital signs. Efficacy measures included the HAMD17, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), and the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scale. Results. The efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients did not differ significantly from that observed in untreated patients initiating duloxetine therapy (mean changes: HAMD17 total score: 12.3 vs. 12.6; HAMA: 9.36 vs. 9.55, CGI-S: 1.94 vs. 2.12, respectively). However, the rate of discontinuation due to adverse events among patients switched to duloxetine was significantly lower than that in patients initiating duloxetine therapy (4.5% vs. 17.9%, p = .008). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in 10% of patients in both treatment groups were nausea, headache, dry mouth, insomnia, and diarrhea. Patients switched to duloxetine reported significantly lower rates of nausea and fatigue compared with patients initiating duloxetine. Conclusions. In this study, the efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients was comparable to that observed in patients initiating duloxetine therapy. Immediate switching from an SSRI or venlafaxine to duloxetine (60 mg QD) was well tolerated.
KW - Duloxetine
KW - SSRI
KW - Safety
KW - Switching
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28844460300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28844460300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10401230500296402
DO - 10.1080/10401230500296402
M3 - Article
C2 - 16402760
AN - SCOPUS:28844460300
VL - 17
SP - 259
EP - 268
JO - Annals of Clinical Psychiatry
JF - Annals of Clinical Psychiatry
SN - 1040-1237
IS - 4
ER -