TY - JOUR
T1 - Ileocecal Anastomosis Type Significantly Influences Long-Term Functional Status, Quality of Life, and Healthcare Utilization in Postoperative Crohn's Disease Patients Independent of Inflammation Recurrence
AU - Gajendran, Mahesh
AU - Bauer, Anthony J.
AU - Buchholz, Bettina M.
AU - Watson, Andrew R.
AU - Koutroubakis, Ioannis E.
AU - Hashash, Jana G.
AU - Ramos-Rivers, Claudia
AU - Shah, Nilesh
AU - Lee, Kenneth K.
AU - Cruz, Ruy J.
AU - Regueiro, Miguel
AU - Zuckerbraun, Brian
AU - Schwartz, Marc
AU - Swoger, Jason
AU - Barrie, Arthur
AU - Harrison, Janet
AU - Hartman, Douglas J.
AU - Salgado, Javier
AU - Rivers, William M.
AU - Click, Benjamin
AU - Anderson, Alyce M.
AU - Umapathy, Chandraprakash
AU - Babichenko, Dmitriy
AU - Dunn, Michael A.
AU - Binion, David G.
N1 - Funding Information:
Guarantor of the article: David G. Binion, MD. Specific author contributions:Mahesh Gajendran: Study concept and design, acquisition and organization of data, table creation, figure creation, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and manuscript revision and finalization. Final draft approval. Anthony J. Bauer: Contributed to study concept and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, review and editing of the manuscript, and also technical and material support. Final draft approval. Bettina M. Buchholz: Contributed to study concept and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and technical surgical support. Final draft approval. Andrew R. Watson, Ioannis E. Koutroubakis: Study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data, review and editing of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Final draft approval. Jana G. Hashash: Drafting of the manuscript; review and editing of the manuscript for important intellectual content; statistical analysis. Final draft approval. Claudia Ramos-Rivers: Data acquisition and analysis, organization and interpretation of data, review and editing of the manuscript. Final draft approval. Nilesh Shah: Statistical analysis and interpretation of data; review and editing of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Final draft approval. Kenneth K. Lee, Ruy J. Cruz, Miguel Regueiro, Brian Zuckerbraun, Marc Schwartz, Jason Swoger, Arthur Barrie, Janet Harrison, Douglas Hartman, Javier Salgado, and Michael A. Dunn: Review and editing of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Final draft approval. William M. Rivers: Review and editing of the manuscript for important intellectual content, contributed to study concept and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and technical surgical support. Final draft approval. Benjamin Click: Data analysis, organization and contribution of data, and review and editing of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Final draft approval. Alyce M. Anderson: Organization of data, figure revisions, reviews of statistical methods, manuscript drafting, and revisions and finalization. Final draft approval. Chandra Umapathy: Analysis and interpretation of data, and review and editing of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Final draft approval. Dmitriy Babichenko: Database management and information support, and review and editing of the manuscript for important intellectual content. Final draft approval. David G. Binion: Senior mentor to primary author, conceptualization and visualization of study, methodology, study supervision, analysis and interpretation of data, review and editing of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and final approval of the study. Final draft approval. Financial support: David G. Binion and Michael A. Dunn were supported from the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (Grant W81XWH-11-2-0133). David G. Binion and Claudia Ramos-Rivers are supported by the Department of Defense Off ice of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (Grant PR160719; PI: David G. Binion, MD). Alyce M. Anderson was supported by University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute (5TL1TR000145-09 to AMA; PI: Steven Reiss, MD). Benjamin Click was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grant 5T32DK063922-12; PI: David Whitcomb, MD, PhD). Potential competing interests: None.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the American College of Gastroenterology.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Objectives: Anastomotic reconstruction following intestinal resection in Crohn's disease (CD) may employ side-to-side anastomosis (STSA; anti-peristaltic orientation) or end-to-end anastomosis (ETEA). Our aim was to determine the impact of these two anastomotic techniques on long-term clinical status in postoperative CD patients. Methods: We performed a comparative effectiveness study of prospectively collected observational data from consented CD patients undergoing their first or second ileocolonic bowel resection and re-anastomosis between 2008 and 2012, in order to assess the association between anastomosis type and 2-year postoperative quality of life (QoL), healthcare utilization, disease clinical or endoscopic recurrence, use of medications, and need for repeat resection. Results: One hundred and twenty eight postoperative CD patients (60 STSA and 68 ETEA) were evaluated. At 2 years postoperatively, STSA patients had higher rates of emergency department visits (33.3% vs. 14.7%; P=0.01), hospitalizations (30% vs. 11.8%; P=0.01), and abdominal computed tomography scans (50% vs. 13.2%; P<0.001) with lower QoL (mean short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire 47.9 vs. 53.4; P=0.007). There was no difference among the two groups in the 30 day surgical complications and 2-year patterns of disease activity, CD medication requirement, endoscopic recurrence, and need for new surgical management (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: At 2 years postoperatively, CD patients with ETEA demonstrated better QoL and less healthcare utilization compared with STSA, despite having similar patterns of disease recurrence and CD treatment. These findings suggest that surgical reconstruction of the bowel as an intact tube (ETEA) contribute to improved functional and clinical status in patients with CD.
AB - Objectives: Anastomotic reconstruction following intestinal resection in Crohn's disease (CD) may employ side-to-side anastomosis (STSA; anti-peristaltic orientation) or end-to-end anastomosis (ETEA). Our aim was to determine the impact of these two anastomotic techniques on long-term clinical status in postoperative CD patients. Methods: We performed a comparative effectiveness study of prospectively collected observational data from consented CD patients undergoing their first or second ileocolonic bowel resection and re-anastomosis between 2008 and 2012, in order to assess the association between anastomosis type and 2-year postoperative quality of life (QoL), healthcare utilization, disease clinical or endoscopic recurrence, use of medications, and need for repeat resection. Results: One hundred and twenty eight postoperative CD patients (60 STSA and 68 ETEA) were evaluated. At 2 years postoperatively, STSA patients had higher rates of emergency department visits (33.3% vs. 14.7%; P=0.01), hospitalizations (30% vs. 11.8%; P=0.01), and abdominal computed tomography scans (50% vs. 13.2%; P<0.001) with lower QoL (mean short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire 47.9 vs. 53.4; P=0.007). There was no difference among the two groups in the 30 day surgical complications and 2-year patterns of disease activity, CD medication requirement, endoscopic recurrence, and need for new surgical management (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: At 2 years postoperatively, CD patients with ETEA demonstrated better QoL and less healthcare utilization compared with STSA, despite having similar patterns of disease recurrence and CD treatment. These findings suggest that surgical reconstruction of the bowel as an intact tube (ETEA) contribute to improved functional and clinical status in patients with CD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044836737&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044836737&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/ajg.2018.13
DO - 10.1038/ajg.2018.13
M3 - Article
C2 - 29610509
AN - SCOPUS:85044836737
SN - 0002-9270
VL - 113
SP - 576
EP - 583
JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 4
ER -