Identifying patterns in implementation of hospital pressure ulcer prevention programs a multisite qualitative study

Lynn M. Soban, Erin Finley Garcia, Rebecca S. Miltner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the presence or absence of key components of hospital pressure ulcer (PU) prevention programs in 6 acute care hospitals. DESIGN: Multisite comparative case study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Using purposeful selection based on PU rates (high vs low) and hospital size, 6 hospitals within the Veterans Health Administration health care system were invited to participate. Key informant interviews (n = 48) were conducted in each of the 6 participating hospitals among individuals playing key roles in PU prevention: senior nursing leadership (n = 9), nurse manager (n = 7), wound care specialist (n = 6), frontline RNs (n = 26). METHODS: Qualitative data were collected during face-to-face, semistructured interviews. Interview protocols were tailored to each interviewee's role with a core set of common questions covering 3 major content areas: (1) practice environment (eg, policies and wound care specialists), (2) current prevention practices (eg, conduct of PU risk assessment and skin inspection), and (3) barriers to PU prevention. We conducted structured coding of 5 key components of PU prevention programs and cross-case analysis to identify patterns in operationalization and implementation of program components across hospitals based on facility size and PU rates (low vs high). RESULTS: All hospitals had implemented all PU prevention program components. Component operationalization varied considerably across hospitals. Wound care specialists were integral to the operationalization of the 4 other program components examined; however, staffi ng levels and work assignments of wound care specialists varied widely. Patterns emerged among hospitals with low and high PU rates with respect to wound care specialist staffi ng, data monitoring, and staff education. CONCLUSION: We found hospital-level variations in PU prevention programs. Wound care specialist staffi ng may represent a potential point of leverage in achieving other PU program components, particularly performance monitoring and staff education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-253
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Pressure Ulcer
Wounds and Injuries
Interviews
Health Facility Size
Veterans Health
Education
Nurse Administrators
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Nursing
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Nursing
  • Organization and delivery of care
  • Pressure ulcer prevention
  • Qualitative evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medical–Surgical
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Identifying patterns in implementation of hospital pressure ulcer prevention programs a multisite qualitative study. / Soban, Lynn M.; Finley Garcia, Erin; Miltner, Rebecca S.

In: Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 248-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{445e6f9b3b2c4ec59de22dd1f16f6a4d,
title = "Identifying patterns in implementation of hospital pressure ulcer prevention programs a multisite qualitative study",
abstract = "Purpose: To describe the presence or absence of key components of hospital pressure ulcer (PU) prevention programs in 6 acute care hospitals. DESIGN: Multisite comparative case study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Using purposeful selection based on PU rates (high vs low) and hospital size, 6 hospitals within the Veterans Health Administration health care system were invited to participate. Key informant interviews (n = 48) were conducted in each of the 6 participating hospitals among individuals playing key roles in PU prevention: senior nursing leadership (n = 9), nurse manager (n = 7), wound care specialist (n = 6), frontline RNs (n = 26). METHODS: Qualitative data were collected during face-to-face, semistructured interviews. Interview protocols were tailored to each interviewee's role with a core set of common questions covering 3 major content areas: (1) practice environment (eg, policies and wound care specialists), (2) current prevention practices (eg, conduct of PU risk assessment and skin inspection), and (3) barriers to PU prevention. We conducted structured coding of 5 key components of PU prevention programs and cross-case analysis to identify patterns in operationalization and implementation of program components across hospitals based on facility size and PU rates (low vs high). RESULTS: All hospitals had implemented all PU prevention program components. Component operationalization varied considerably across hospitals. Wound care specialists were integral to the operationalization of the 4 other program components examined; however, staffi ng levels and work assignments of wound care specialists varied widely. Patterns emerged among hospitals with low and high PU rates with respect to wound care specialist staffi ng, data monitoring, and staff education. CONCLUSION: We found hospital-level variations in PU prevention programs. Wound care specialist staffi ng may represent a potential point of leverage in achieving other PU program components, particularly performance monitoring and staff education.",
keywords = "Nursing, Organization and delivery of care, Pressure ulcer prevention, Qualitative evaluation",
author = "Soban, {Lynn M.} and {Finley Garcia}, Erin and Miltner, {Rebecca S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/WON.0000000000000228",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "248--253",
journal = "Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing",
issn = "1071-5754",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying patterns in implementation of hospital pressure ulcer prevention programs a multisite qualitative study

AU - Soban, Lynn M.

AU - Finley Garcia, Erin

AU - Miltner, Rebecca S.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Purpose: To describe the presence or absence of key components of hospital pressure ulcer (PU) prevention programs in 6 acute care hospitals. DESIGN: Multisite comparative case study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Using purposeful selection based on PU rates (high vs low) and hospital size, 6 hospitals within the Veterans Health Administration health care system were invited to participate. Key informant interviews (n = 48) were conducted in each of the 6 participating hospitals among individuals playing key roles in PU prevention: senior nursing leadership (n = 9), nurse manager (n = 7), wound care specialist (n = 6), frontline RNs (n = 26). METHODS: Qualitative data were collected during face-to-face, semistructured interviews. Interview protocols were tailored to each interviewee's role with a core set of common questions covering 3 major content areas: (1) practice environment (eg, policies and wound care specialists), (2) current prevention practices (eg, conduct of PU risk assessment and skin inspection), and (3) barriers to PU prevention. We conducted structured coding of 5 key components of PU prevention programs and cross-case analysis to identify patterns in operationalization and implementation of program components across hospitals based on facility size and PU rates (low vs high). RESULTS: All hospitals had implemented all PU prevention program components. Component operationalization varied considerably across hospitals. Wound care specialists were integral to the operationalization of the 4 other program components examined; however, staffi ng levels and work assignments of wound care specialists varied widely. Patterns emerged among hospitals with low and high PU rates with respect to wound care specialist staffi ng, data monitoring, and staff education. CONCLUSION: We found hospital-level variations in PU prevention programs. Wound care specialist staffi ng may represent a potential point of leverage in achieving other PU program components, particularly performance monitoring and staff education.

AB - Purpose: To describe the presence or absence of key components of hospital pressure ulcer (PU) prevention programs in 6 acute care hospitals. DESIGN: Multisite comparative case study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Using purposeful selection based on PU rates (high vs low) and hospital size, 6 hospitals within the Veterans Health Administration health care system were invited to participate. Key informant interviews (n = 48) were conducted in each of the 6 participating hospitals among individuals playing key roles in PU prevention: senior nursing leadership (n = 9), nurse manager (n = 7), wound care specialist (n = 6), frontline RNs (n = 26). METHODS: Qualitative data were collected during face-to-face, semistructured interviews. Interview protocols were tailored to each interviewee's role with a core set of common questions covering 3 major content areas: (1) practice environment (eg, policies and wound care specialists), (2) current prevention practices (eg, conduct of PU risk assessment and skin inspection), and (3) barriers to PU prevention. We conducted structured coding of 5 key components of PU prevention programs and cross-case analysis to identify patterns in operationalization and implementation of program components across hospitals based on facility size and PU rates (low vs high). RESULTS: All hospitals had implemented all PU prevention program components. Component operationalization varied considerably across hospitals. Wound care specialists were integral to the operationalization of the 4 other program components examined; however, staffi ng levels and work assignments of wound care specialists varied widely. Patterns emerged among hospitals with low and high PU rates with respect to wound care specialist staffi ng, data monitoring, and staff education. CONCLUSION: We found hospital-level variations in PU prevention programs. Wound care specialist staffi ng may represent a potential point of leverage in achieving other PU program components, particularly performance monitoring and staff education.

KW - Nursing

KW - Organization and delivery of care

KW - Pressure ulcer prevention

KW - Qualitative evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970004094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970004094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/WON.0000000000000228

DO - 10.1097/WON.0000000000000228

M3 - Article

C2 - 27167318

AN - SCOPUS:84970004094

VL - 43

SP - 248

EP - 253

JO - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

JF - Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

SN - 1071-5754

IS - 3

ER -