TY - JOUR
T1 - How to design equitable digital health tools
T2 - A narrative review of design tactics, case studies, and opportunities
AU - Bucher, Amy
AU - Chaudhry, Beenish M.
AU - Davis, Jean W.
AU - Lawrence, Katharine
AU - Panza, Emily
AU - Baqer, Manal
AU - Feinstein, Rebecca T.
AU - Fields, Sherecce A.
AU - Huberty, Jennifer
AU - Kaplan, Deanna M.
AU - Kusters, Isabelle S.
AU - Materia, Frank T.
AU - Park, Susanna Y.
AU - Kepper, Maura
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Bucher et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2024/8/1
Y1 - 2024/8/1
N2 - With a renewed focus on health equity in the United States driven : by national crises and legislation to improve digital healthcare innovation, there is a need for the designers of digital health tools to take deliberate steps to design for equity in their work. A concrete toolkit of methods to design for health equity is needed to support digital health practitioners in this aim. This narrative review summarizes several health equity frameworks to help digital health practitioners conceptualize the equity dimensions of importance for their work, and then provides design approaches that accommodate an equity focus. Specifically, the Double Diamond Model, the IDEAS framework and toolkit, and community collaboration techniques such as participatory design are explored as mechanisms for practitioners to solicit input from members of underserved groups and better design digital health tools that serve their needs. Each of these design methods requires a deliberate effort by practitioners to infuse health equity into the approach. A series of case studies that use different methods to build in equity considerations are offered to provide examples of how this can be accomplished and demonstrate the range of applications available depending on resources, budget, product maturity, and other factors. We conclude with a call for shared rigor around designing digital health tools that deliver equitable outcomes for members of underserved populations.
AB - With a renewed focus on health equity in the United States driven : by national crises and legislation to improve digital healthcare innovation, there is a need for the designers of digital health tools to take deliberate steps to design for equity in their work. A concrete toolkit of methods to design for health equity is needed to support digital health practitioners in this aim. This narrative review summarizes several health equity frameworks to help digital health practitioners conceptualize the equity dimensions of importance for their work, and then provides design approaches that accommodate an equity focus. Specifically, the Double Diamond Model, the IDEAS framework and toolkit, and community collaboration techniques such as participatory design are explored as mechanisms for practitioners to solicit input from members of underserved groups and better design digital health tools that serve their needs. Each of these design methods requires a deliberate effort by practitioners to infuse health equity into the approach. A series of case studies that use different methods to build in equity considerations are offered to provide examples of how this can be accomplished and demonstrate the range of applications available depending on resources, budget, product maturity, and other factors. We conclude with a call for shared rigor around designing digital health tools that deliver equitable outcomes for members of underserved populations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201879958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85201879958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000591
DO - 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000591
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39172776
AN - SCOPUS:85201879958
SN - 2767-3170
VL - 3
JO - PLOS Digital Health
JF - PLOS Digital Health
IS - 8
M1 - e0000591
ER -