Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

HiRes 90K implantation using a minimally invasive surgical technique

  • Brian P. Perry
  • , Kelly Hernandez
  • , Charles A. Syms
  • , Susan M. King
  • , James E. Olsson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This retrospective study compared safety and device outcomes for the HiRes 90K implant between (1) a minimally invasive (MI) surgical approach and early initial stimulation and (2) conventional surgical procedures and traditional initial programming schedules. Eight adults and 21 children were implanted using the MI approach and were programmed initially within 1 week after surgery. Surgical complications and device stability were compared to 55 adults and 16 children who were implanted using conventional surgery and programmed initially 4–6 weeks after surgery. No clinical differences were noted between patients undergoing MI surgery and patients implanted using more common surgical procedures. Electrode impedances stabilized earlier in the MI patients, and comfort levels for electrical stimulation were comparable between the two groups. Patients and families in the MI group have responded favorably to the shorter healing time, minimal hair shave, and shorter wait until initial programming.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-128
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Congress Series
Volume1273
Issue numberC
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cochlear implants
  • Minimally invasive surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HiRes 90K implantation using a minimally invasive surgical technique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this