Heterogeneous fractionation profiles of meta-analytic coactivation networks

Angela R. Laird, Michael C. Riedel, Mershack Okoe, Radu Jianu, Kimberly L. Ray, Simon B. Eickhoff, Stephen M. Smith, Peter T. Fox, Matthew T. Sutherland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


Computational cognitive neuroimaging approaches can be leveraged to characterize the hierarchical organization of distributed, functionally specialized networks in the human brain. To this end, we performed large-scale mining across the BrainMap database of coordinate-based activation locations from over 10,000 task-based experiments. Meta-analytic coactivation networks were identified by jointly applying independent component analysis (ICA) and meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM) across a wide range of model orders (i.e., d=20–300). We then iteratively computed pairwise correlation coefficients for consecutive model orders to compare spatial network topologies, ultimately yielding fractionation profiles delineating how “parent” functional brain systems decompose into constituent “child” sub-networks. Fractionation profiles differed dramatically across canonical networks: some exhibited complex and extensive fractionation into a large number of sub-networks across the full range of model orders, whereas others exhibited little to no decomposition as model order increased. Hierarchical clustering was applied to evaluate this heterogeneity, yielding three distinct groups of network fractionation profiles: high, moderate, and low fractionation. BrainMap-based functional decoding of resultant coactivation networks revealed a multi-domain association regardless of fractionation complexity. Rather than emphasize a cognitive-motor-perceptual gradient, these outcomes suggest the importance of inter-lobar connectivity in functional brain organization. We conclude that high fractionation networks are complex and comprised of many constituent sub-networks reflecting long-range, inter-lobar connectivity, particularly in fronto-parietal regions. In contrast, low fractionation networks may reflect persistent and stable networks that are more internally coherent and exhibit reduced inter-lobar communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)424-435
Number of pages12
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017


  • BrainMap
  • Fractionation
  • Independent component analysis
  • Meta-analytic coactivation networks
  • Meta-analytic connectivity modeling
  • Neuroimaging meta-analysis
  • Neuroinformatics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience


Dive into the research topics of 'Heterogeneous fractionation profiles of meta-analytic coactivation networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this