Heterogeneity in the Relationship between the Time Tradeoff and Short Form-36 for HIV-Infected and Primary Care Patients

Jan Roelf Bult, Maria G.M. Hunink, Joel Tsevat, Milton C. Weinstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. Evidence in the literature suggests that the overall correlation between descriptive and valuational measures of health are weak to moderate. In this study, the relationship between descriptive health status measures, obtained using the Short-Form 36, and health values, measured with the time tradeoff, was explored. METHODS. Two groups of patients matched for age and gender were interviewed. One group comprised 139 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients; the other group comprised 124 primary care patients. The relationship between the SF-36 and the time tradeoff was estimated, assuming homogeneity across patients, using multiple regression analysis. Subsequently, the relationship was examined assuming heterogeneity across patients and using the expectation maximization algorithm in a maximum likelihood context (latent class analysis). RESULTS. Four classes, representing 47%, 13%, 8%, and 32% of the population, respectively, were found. The overall percentage of variation explained under the assumption of a homogeneous relationship was only 33% as compared with 85% when heterogeneity was accounted for. Only three characteristics (educational level, employment status, and the SF-36 social functioning score) sufficed to generate a nearly perfect classification of the patients. CONCLUSIONS. Heterogeneity across subjects should be taken into account in describing the relationship between health values and health status dimensions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-532
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Care
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
HIV
Health Status
Health
Research Design
Regression Analysis
Population

Keywords

  • Health status measure
  • Health utility measure
  • Heterogeneity
  • Latent class analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Heterogeneity in the Relationship between the Time Tradeoff and Short Form-36 for HIV-Infected and Primary Care Patients. / Bult, Jan Roelf; Hunink, Maria G.M.; Tsevat, Joel; Weinstein, Milton C.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 523-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bult, Jan Roelf ; Hunink, Maria G.M. ; Tsevat, Joel ; Weinstein, Milton C. / Heterogeneity in the Relationship between the Time Tradeoff and Short Form-36 for HIV-Infected and Primary Care Patients. In: Medical Care. 1998 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 523-532.
@article{6b4926acb4eb49e4b8b022c37e43bc29,
title = "Heterogeneity in the Relationship between the Time Tradeoff and Short Form-36 for HIV-Infected and Primary Care Patients",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES. Evidence in the literature suggests that the overall correlation between descriptive and valuational measures of health are weak to moderate. In this study, the relationship between descriptive health status measures, obtained using the Short-Form 36, and health values, measured with the time tradeoff, was explored. METHODS. Two groups of patients matched for age and gender were interviewed. One group comprised 139 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients; the other group comprised 124 primary care patients. The relationship between the SF-36 and the time tradeoff was estimated, assuming homogeneity across patients, using multiple regression analysis. Subsequently, the relationship was examined assuming heterogeneity across patients and using the expectation maximization algorithm in a maximum likelihood context (latent class analysis). RESULTS. Four classes, representing 47{\%}, 13{\%}, 8{\%}, and 32{\%} of the population, respectively, were found. The overall percentage of variation explained under the assumption of a homogeneous relationship was only 33{\%} as compared with 85{\%} when heterogeneity was accounted for. Only three characteristics (educational level, employment status, and the SF-36 social functioning score) sufficed to generate a nearly perfect classification of the patients. CONCLUSIONS. Heterogeneity across subjects should be taken into account in describing the relationship between health values and health status dimensions.",
keywords = "Health status measure, Health utility measure, Heterogeneity, Latent class analysis",
author = "Bult, {Jan Roelf} and Hunink, {Maria G.M.} and Joel Tsevat and Weinstein, {Milton C.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005650-199804000-00008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "523--532",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heterogeneity in the Relationship between the Time Tradeoff and Short Form-36 for HIV-Infected and Primary Care Patients

AU - Bult, Jan Roelf

AU - Hunink, Maria G.M.

AU - Tsevat, Joel

AU - Weinstein, Milton C.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES. Evidence in the literature suggests that the overall correlation between descriptive and valuational measures of health are weak to moderate. In this study, the relationship between descriptive health status measures, obtained using the Short-Form 36, and health values, measured with the time tradeoff, was explored. METHODS. Two groups of patients matched for age and gender were interviewed. One group comprised 139 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients; the other group comprised 124 primary care patients. The relationship between the SF-36 and the time tradeoff was estimated, assuming homogeneity across patients, using multiple regression analysis. Subsequently, the relationship was examined assuming heterogeneity across patients and using the expectation maximization algorithm in a maximum likelihood context (latent class analysis). RESULTS. Four classes, representing 47%, 13%, 8%, and 32% of the population, respectively, were found. The overall percentage of variation explained under the assumption of a homogeneous relationship was only 33% as compared with 85% when heterogeneity was accounted for. Only three characteristics (educational level, employment status, and the SF-36 social functioning score) sufficed to generate a nearly perfect classification of the patients. CONCLUSIONS. Heterogeneity across subjects should be taken into account in describing the relationship between health values and health status dimensions.

AB - OBJECTIVES. Evidence in the literature suggests that the overall correlation between descriptive and valuational measures of health are weak to moderate. In this study, the relationship between descriptive health status measures, obtained using the Short-Form 36, and health values, measured with the time tradeoff, was explored. METHODS. Two groups of patients matched for age and gender were interviewed. One group comprised 139 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients; the other group comprised 124 primary care patients. The relationship between the SF-36 and the time tradeoff was estimated, assuming homogeneity across patients, using multiple regression analysis. Subsequently, the relationship was examined assuming heterogeneity across patients and using the expectation maximization algorithm in a maximum likelihood context (latent class analysis). RESULTS. Four classes, representing 47%, 13%, 8%, and 32% of the population, respectively, were found. The overall percentage of variation explained under the assumption of a homogeneous relationship was only 33% as compared with 85% when heterogeneity was accounted for. Only three characteristics (educational level, employment status, and the SF-36 social functioning score) sufficed to generate a nearly perfect classification of the patients. CONCLUSIONS. Heterogeneity across subjects should be taken into account in describing the relationship between health values and health status dimensions.

KW - Health status measure

KW - Health utility measure

KW - Heterogeneity

KW - Latent class analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032036332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032036332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005650-199804000-00008

DO - 10.1097/00005650-199804000-00008

M3 - Article

C2 - 9544592

AN - SCOPUS:0032036332

VL - 36

SP - 523

EP - 532

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 4

ER -