TY - JOUR
T1 - Heart failure in primary care
T2 - Measuring the quality of care
AU - James, Paul A.
AU - Cowan, Timothy M.
AU - Graham, Robin P.
AU - Jaén, Carlos Roberto
AU - Majeroni, Barbara A.
AU - Schwartz, Jeffrey S.
PY - 1999/12/1
Y1 - 1999/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND. Concerns exist about the quality of care provided to heart failure patients by primary care physicians. Using an evidence-based clinical guideline, we evaluated the care given to patients with systolic heart failure. METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 420 patients from 25 primary care practices in upstate New York who had received a diagnosis of heart failure. Chart documentation confirmed the diagnosis (n = 395). We excluded patients with noncardiogenic volume overload or correctable valvular disease (n = 338). Performance profiles measured use of diagnostic tests, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement, patient education, and prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. For treatment recommendations, patients were classified according to LVEF status. RESULTS. Only 82% of the patients studied had an LVEF test result documented in their charts. Of these, 49% had an LVEF ≤40%. ACE inhibitor use was greater among patients with low LVEF (91%) than among those with a normal LVEF (62%). Among patients with systolic heart failure taking ACE inhibitors, 87% were at target doses. Adherence measures were low for laboratory evaluation and patient-education criteria. CONCLUSIONS. Heart failure with normal LVEF was as prevalent as systolic heart failure in these primary care practices. Performance profiles for the physicians' prescriptions of ACE inhibitors exceeded those published in the literature. Patients who did not have a documented measure of LVEF, however, received lower quality of care as measured by this disease-specific guideline. This underscores the importance of measuring LVEF.
AB - BACKGROUND. Concerns exist about the quality of care provided to heart failure patients by primary care physicians. Using an evidence-based clinical guideline, we evaluated the care given to patients with systolic heart failure. METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 420 patients from 25 primary care practices in upstate New York who had received a diagnosis of heart failure. Chart documentation confirmed the diagnosis (n = 395). We excluded patients with noncardiogenic volume overload or correctable valvular disease (n = 338). Performance profiles measured use of diagnostic tests, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement, patient education, and prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. For treatment recommendations, patients were classified according to LVEF status. RESULTS. Only 82% of the patients studied had an LVEF test result documented in their charts. Of these, 49% had an LVEF ≤40%. ACE inhibitor use was greater among patients with low LVEF (91%) than among those with a normal LVEF (62%). Among patients with systolic heart failure taking ACE inhibitors, 87% were at target doses. Adherence measures were low for laboratory evaluation and patient-education criteria. CONCLUSIONS. Heart failure with normal LVEF was as prevalent as systolic heart failure in these primary care practices. Performance profiles for the physicians' prescriptions of ACE inhibitors exceeded those published in the literature. Patients who did not have a documented measure of LVEF, however, received lower quality of care as measured by this disease-specific guideline. This underscores the importance of measuring LVEF.
KW - Guidelines
KW - Heart failure, congestive
KW - Quality of health care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033203748&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033203748&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 12224677
AN - SCOPUS:0033203748
SN - 0094-3509
VL - 48
SP - 790
EP - 798
JO - Journal of Family Practice
JF - Journal of Family Practice
IS - 10
ER -