Geographic disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region

Neal R. Barshes, Natasha S. Becker, W. Kenneth Washburn, Glenn A Halff, Thomas A. Alola, John A. Goss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system has improved the ability to measure medical urgency for transplantation, geographic disparities in the probability of being delisted as a result of complications of end-stage liver disease or death and in the probability of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remain. The purpose of the current study was to identify factors associated with these variations among donor service areas (DSAs) in one United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) region. Data for 2,948 candidates listed for OLT within 4 DSAs in UNOS region 4 between February 2002 and November 2005 were obtained from UNOS. Multivariate regression models were used to identify study factors associated with delisting (due to deterioration or death) and likelihood of OLT. After risk adjustment for candidate characteristics, those listed in DSA-3 and DSA-4 were at significantly higher risk of delisting than candidates listed in DSA-2 (hazard ratio, 1.22 and 1.10 vs. 0.87 for DSA-2; P = 0.01 and 0.05, respectively). In addition, the likelihood of OLT was significantly higher for candidates listed in DSA-1 than in DSA-2, DSA-3 or DSA-4 (hazard ratio, 1.00 compared with 0.45, 0.77, and 0.51; P< 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). Despite the implementation of the MELD system, great geographic disparities exist in the likelihood of delisting and for OLT, suggesting the need for further refinement in regional allocation strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)747-751
Number of pages5
JournalLiver Transplantation
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Liver Transplantation
End Stage Liver Disease
Risk Adjustment
Transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Geographic disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region. / Barshes, Neal R.; Becker, Natasha S.; Washburn, W. Kenneth; Halff, Glenn A; Alola, Thomas A.; Goss, John A.

In: Liver Transplantation, Vol. 13, No. 5, 05.2007, p. 747-751.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barshes, Neal R. ; Becker, Natasha S. ; Washburn, W. Kenneth ; Halff, Glenn A ; Alola, Thomas A. ; Goss, John A. / Geographic disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region. In: Liver Transplantation. 2007 ; Vol. 13, No. 5. pp. 747-751.
@article{b7d0181d69584703a54824c115d082c7,
title = "Geographic disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region",
abstract = "Although the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system has improved the ability to measure medical urgency for transplantation, geographic disparities in the probability of being delisted as a result of complications of end-stage liver disease or death and in the probability of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remain. The purpose of the current study was to identify factors associated with these variations among donor service areas (DSAs) in one United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) region. Data for 2,948 candidates listed for OLT within 4 DSAs in UNOS region 4 between February 2002 and November 2005 were obtained from UNOS. Multivariate regression models were used to identify study factors associated with delisting (due to deterioration or death) and likelihood of OLT. After risk adjustment for candidate characteristics, those listed in DSA-3 and DSA-4 were at significantly higher risk of delisting than candidates listed in DSA-2 (hazard ratio, 1.22 and 1.10 vs. 0.87 for DSA-2; P = 0.01 and 0.05, respectively). In addition, the likelihood of OLT was significantly higher for candidates listed in DSA-1 than in DSA-2, DSA-3 or DSA-4 (hazard ratio, 1.00 compared with 0.45, 0.77, and 0.51; P< 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). Despite the implementation of the MELD system, great geographic disparities exist in the likelihood of delisting and for OLT, suggesting the need for further refinement in regional allocation strategies.",
author = "Barshes, {Neal R.} and Becker, {Natasha S.} and Washburn, {W. Kenneth} and Halff, {Glenn A} and Alola, {Thomas A.} and Goss, {John A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/lt.21158",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "747--751",
journal = "Liver Transplantation",
issn = "1527-6465",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geographic disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region

AU - Barshes, Neal R.

AU - Becker, Natasha S.

AU - Washburn, W. Kenneth

AU - Halff, Glenn A

AU - Alola, Thomas A.

AU - Goss, John A.

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Although the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system has improved the ability to measure medical urgency for transplantation, geographic disparities in the probability of being delisted as a result of complications of end-stage liver disease or death and in the probability of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remain. The purpose of the current study was to identify factors associated with these variations among donor service areas (DSAs) in one United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) region. Data for 2,948 candidates listed for OLT within 4 DSAs in UNOS region 4 between February 2002 and November 2005 were obtained from UNOS. Multivariate regression models were used to identify study factors associated with delisting (due to deterioration or death) and likelihood of OLT. After risk adjustment for candidate characteristics, those listed in DSA-3 and DSA-4 were at significantly higher risk of delisting than candidates listed in DSA-2 (hazard ratio, 1.22 and 1.10 vs. 0.87 for DSA-2; P = 0.01 and 0.05, respectively). In addition, the likelihood of OLT was significantly higher for candidates listed in DSA-1 than in DSA-2, DSA-3 or DSA-4 (hazard ratio, 1.00 compared with 0.45, 0.77, and 0.51; P< 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). Despite the implementation of the MELD system, great geographic disparities exist in the likelihood of delisting and for OLT, suggesting the need for further refinement in regional allocation strategies.

AB - Although the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoring system has improved the ability to measure medical urgency for transplantation, geographic disparities in the probability of being delisted as a result of complications of end-stage liver disease or death and in the probability of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remain. The purpose of the current study was to identify factors associated with these variations among donor service areas (DSAs) in one United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) region. Data for 2,948 candidates listed for OLT within 4 DSAs in UNOS region 4 between February 2002 and November 2005 were obtained from UNOS. Multivariate regression models were used to identify study factors associated with delisting (due to deterioration or death) and likelihood of OLT. After risk adjustment for candidate characteristics, those listed in DSA-3 and DSA-4 were at significantly higher risk of delisting than candidates listed in DSA-2 (hazard ratio, 1.22 and 1.10 vs. 0.87 for DSA-2; P = 0.01 and 0.05, respectively). In addition, the likelihood of OLT was significantly higher for candidates listed in DSA-1 than in DSA-2, DSA-3 or DSA-4 (hazard ratio, 1.00 compared with 0.45, 0.77, and 0.51; P< 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). Despite the implementation of the MELD system, great geographic disparities exist in the likelihood of delisting and for OLT, suggesting the need for further refinement in regional allocation strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249069805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249069805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lt.21158

DO - 10.1002/lt.21158

M3 - Article

C2 - 17457866

AN - SCOPUS:34249069805

VL - 13

SP - 747

EP - 751

JO - Liver Transplantation

JF - Liver Transplantation

SN - 1527-6465

IS - 5

ER -