TY - JOUR
T1 - Geographic and temporal trends in antimicrobial nonsusceptibility in streptococcus pneumoniae in the post-vaccine era in the United States
AU - Link-Gelles, Ruth
AU - Thomas, Ann
AU - Lynfield, Ruth
AU - Petit, Sue
AU - Schaffner, William
AU - Harrison, Lee
AU - Farley, Monica M.
AU - Aragon, Deborah
AU - Nicols, Megin
AU - Kirley, Pam Daily
AU - Zansky, Shelley
AU - Jorgensen, James
AU - Juni, Billie Anne
AU - Jackson, Delois
AU - Moore, Matthew R.
AU - Lipsitch, Marc
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support. This work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which provides funding for the Active Bacterial Core surveillance (ABCs) system, a collaboration of state health departments, academic institutions, local partners, and the CDC. M. L. was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers 5R01AI048935, 5U54GM088558). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CDC or the National Institutes of Health.
Funding Information:
Potential Conflict of Interest. L. H. has received research support and lecture fees from Sanofi Pasteur, lecture fees from Novartis Vaccines, and has served as a consultant to GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis Vaccines, Sanofi Pasteur, and Pfizer. His financial ties with industry were terminated before he became a member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in July 2012. J. J. is on an advisory board for Merck and has received grant support from bioMerieux and Merck. M. L. has received consulting income from Pfizer, Novartis, and AIR Worldwide. All other authors report no potential conflicts.
PY - 2013/10/15
Y1 - 2013/10/15
N2 - Background. We examined whether observed increases in antibiotic nonsusceptible nonvaccine serotypes after introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the United States in 2000 were driven primarily by vaccine or antibiotic use.Methods. Using active surveillance data, we evaluated geographic and temporal differences in serotype distribution and within-serotype differences during 2000-2009. We compared nonsusceptibility to penicillin and erythromycin by geography after standardizing differences across time, place, and serotype by regressing standardized versus crude proportions. A regression slope (RS) approaching zero indicates greater importance of the standardizing factor.Results. Through 2000-2006, geographic differences in nonsusceptibility were better explained by within-serotype prevalence of nonsusceptibility (RS 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI],. 08-.55 for penicillin) than by geographic differences in serotype distribution (RS 0.71, 95% CI,. 44-.97). From 2007-2009, serotype distribution differences became more important for penicillin (within-serotype RS 0.52, 95% CI,. 11-.93; serotype distribution RS 0.57, 95% CI,. 14-1.0).Conclusions. Differential nonsusceptibility, within individual serotypes, accounts for most geographic variation in nonsusceptibility, suggesting selective pressure from antibiotic use, rather than differences in serotype distribution, mainly determines nonsusceptibility patterns. Recent trends suggest geographic differences in serotype distribution may be affecting the prevalence of nonsusceptibility, possibly due to decreases in the number of nonsusceptible serotypes.
AB - Background. We examined whether observed increases in antibiotic nonsusceptible nonvaccine serotypes after introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the United States in 2000 were driven primarily by vaccine or antibiotic use.Methods. Using active surveillance data, we evaluated geographic and temporal differences in serotype distribution and within-serotype differences during 2000-2009. We compared nonsusceptibility to penicillin and erythromycin by geography after standardizing differences across time, place, and serotype by regressing standardized versus crude proportions. A regression slope (RS) approaching zero indicates greater importance of the standardizing factor.Results. Through 2000-2006, geographic differences in nonsusceptibility were better explained by within-serotype prevalence of nonsusceptibility (RS 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI],. 08-.55 for penicillin) than by geographic differences in serotype distribution (RS 0.71, 95% CI,. 44-.97). From 2007-2009, serotype distribution differences became more important for penicillin (within-serotype RS 0.52, 95% CI,. 11-.93; serotype distribution RS 0.57, 95% CI,. 14-1.0).Conclusions. Differential nonsusceptibility, within individual serotypes, accounts for most geographic variation in nonsusceptibility, suggesting selective pressure from antibiotic use, rather than differences in serotype distribution, mainly determines nonsusceptibility patterns. Recent trends suggest geographic differences in serotype distribution may be affecting the prevalence of nonsusceptibility, possibly due to decreases in the number of nonsusceptible serotypes.
KW - Streptococcus pneumoniae
KW - antimicrobial resistance
KW - erythromycin
KW - invasive pneumococcal disease
KW - penicillin
KW - pneumococcus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885039129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885039129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/infdis/jit315
DO - 10.1093/infdis/jit315
M3 - Article
C2 - 23852588
AN - SCOPUS:84885039129
SN - 0022-1899
VL - 208
SP - 1266
EP - 1273
JO - Journal of Infectious Diseases
JF - Journal of Infectious Diseases
IS - 8
ER -