TY - JOUR
T1 - Genomic methods identify homologous recombination deficiency in pancreas adenocarcinoma and optimize treatment selection
AU - Park, Wungki
AU - Chen, Jiapeng
AU - Chou, Joanne F.
AU - Varghese, Anna M.
AU - Yu, Kenneth H.
AU - Wong, Winston
AU - Capanu, Marinela
AU - Balachandran, Vinod
AU - McIntyre, Caitlin A.
AU - Dika, Imane El
AU - Khalil, Danny N.
AU - Harding, James J.
AU - Ghalehsari, Nima
AU - McKinnell, Zoe
AU - Chalasani, Sree B.
AU - Makarov, Vladimir
AU - Selenica, Pier
AU - Pei, Xin
AU - Lecomte, Nicolas
AU - Kelsen, David P.
AU - Abou-Alfa, Ghassan K.
AU - Robson, Mark E.
AU - Zhang, Liying
AU - Berger, Michael F.
AU - Schultz, Nikolaus
AU - Chan, Timothy A.
AU - Powell, Simon N.
AU - Reis-Filho, Jorge S.
AU - Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine A.
AU - Riaz, Nadeem
AU - O'Reilly, Eileen M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Purpose: Genomic methods can identify homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Rigorous evaluation of their outcome association to DNA damage response-targeted therapies like platinum in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is essential in maximizing therapeutic outcome. Experimental Design: We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced-stage PDAC, who had both germline- and somatic-targeted gene sequencing. Homologous recombination gene mutations (HRm) were evaluated: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, BAP1, BARD1, BLM, BRIP1, CHEK2, FAM175A, FANCA, FANCC, NBN, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51C, and RTEL1 HRm status was grouped as: (i) germline versus somatic; (ii) core (BRCAs and PALB2) versus non-core (other HRm); and (iii) monoallelic versus biallelic. Genomic instability was compared using large-scale state transition, signature 3, and tumor mutation burden. Results: Among 262 patients, 50 (19%) had HRD (15% germline and 4% somatic). Both groups were analyzed together due to lack of difference in their genomic instability and outcome. Median [95% confidence interval (CI)] follow-up was 21.9 (1.4-57.0) months. Median OS and PFS were 15.5 (14.6-19) and 7 (6.1-8.1) months, respectively. Patients with HRD had improved PFS compared with no HRD when treated with first-line (1L) platinum [HR, 0.44 (95% CI: 0.29-0.67); P < 0.01], but not with 1L-non-platinum. Multivariate analysis showed HRD patients had improved OS regardless of their first-line treatment, but most had platinum exposure during their course. Biallelic HRm (11%) and core HRm (12%) had higher genomic instability, which translated to improved PFS on first-line platinum (1L-platinum) versus 1L-non-platinum. Conclusions: Pathogenic HRm identifies HRD in patients with PDAC with the best outcome when treated with 1L-platinum. Biallelic HRm and core HRm further enriched benefit from 1L-platinum from HRD.
AB - Purpose: Genomic methods can identify homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Rigorous evaluation of their outcome association to DNA damage response-targeted therapies like platinum in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is essential in maximizing therapeutic outcome. Experimental Design: We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced-stage PDAC, who had both germline- and somatic-targeted gene sequencing. Homologous recombination gene mutations (HRm) were evaluated: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, BAP1, BARD1, BLM, BRIP1, CHEK2, FAM175A, FANCA, FANCC, NBN, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51C, and RTEL1 HRm status was grouped as: (i) germline versus somatic; (ii) core (BRCAs and PALB2) versus non-core (other HRm); and (iii) monoallelic versus biallelic. Genomic instability was compared using large-scale state transition, signature 3, and tumor mutation burden. Results: Among 262 patients, 50 (19%) had HRD (15% germline and 4% somatic). Both groups were analyzed together due to lack of difference in their genomic instability and outcome. Median [95% confidence interval (CI)] follow-up was 21.9 (1.4-57.0) months. Median OS and PFS were 15.5 (14.6-19) and 7 (6.1-8.1) months, respectively. Patients with HRD had improved PFS compared with no HRD when treated with first-line (1L) platinum [HR, 0.44 (95% CI: 0.29-0.67); P < 0.01], but not with 1L-non-platinum. Multivariate analysis showed HRD patients had improved OS regardless of their first-line treatment, but most had platinum exposure during their course. Biallelic HRm (11%) and core HRm (12%) had higher genomic instability, which translated to improved PFS on first-line platinum (1L-platinum) versus 1L-non-platinum. Conclusions: Pathogenic HRm identifies HRD in patients with PDAC with the best outcome when treated with 1L-platinum. Biallelic HRm and core HRm further enriched benefit from 1L-platinum from HRD.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85087529675
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85087529675#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0418
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0418
M3 - Article
C2 - 32444418
AN - SCOPUS:85087529675
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 26
SP - 3239
EP - 3247
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 13
ER -