Functional selectivity and classical concepts of quantitative pharmacology

Jonathan D. Urban, William P. Clarke, Mark Von Zastrow, David E. Nichols, Brian Kobilka, Harel Weinstein, Jonathan A. Javitch, Bryan L. Roth, Arthur Christopoulos, Patrick M. Sexton, Keith J. Miller, Michael Spedding, Richard B. Mailman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

806 Scopus citations

Abstract

The concept of intrinsic efficacy has been enshrined in pharmacology for half of a century, yet recent data have revealed that many ligands can differentially activate signaling pathways mediated via a single G protein-coupled receptor in a manner that challenges the traditional definition of intrinsic efficacy. Some terms for this phenomenon include functional selectivity, agonist-directed trafficking, and biased agonism. At the extreme, functionally selective ligands may be both agonists and antagonists at different functions mediated by the same receptor. Data illustrating this phenomenon are presented from serotonin, opioid, dopamine, vasopressin, and adrenergic receptor systems. A variety of mechanisms may influence this apparently ubiquitous phenomenon. It may be initiated by differences in ligand-induced intermediate conformational states, as shown for the β2-adrenergic receptor. Subsequent mechanisms that may play a role include diversity of G proteins, scaffolding and signaling partners, and receptor oligomers. Clearly, expanded research is needed to elucidate the proximal (e.g., how functionally selective ligands cause conformational changes that initiate differential signaling), intermediate (mechanisms that translate conformation changes into differential signaling), and distal mechanisms (differential effects on target tissue or organism). Besides the heuristically interesting nature of functional selectivity, there is a clear impact on drug discovery, because this mechanism raises the possibility of selecting or designing novel ligands that differentially activate only a subset of functions of a single receptor, thereby optimizing therapeutic action. It also may be timely to revise classic concepts in quantitative pharmacology and relevant pharmacological conventions to incorporate these new concepts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Volume320
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Functional selectivity and classical concepts of quantitative pharmacology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Urban, J. D., Clarke, W. P., Von Zastrow, M., Nichols, D. E., Kobilka, B., Weinstein, H., Javitch, J. A., Roth, B. L., Christopoulos, A., Sexton, P. M., Miller, K. J., Spedding, M., & Mailman, R. B. (2007). Functional selectivity and classical concepts of quantitative pharmacology. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 320(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.106.104463