Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: Helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis1

J. A. Soto, F. Múnera, C. Morales, Jorge E Lopera, D. Holguín, O. Guarín, G. Castrillón, A. Sanabria, G. García

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

136 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present our experience with helical computed tomographic (CT) arteriography as the initial diagnostic examination in patients suspected to have focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 19 months, 142 arterial segments in the proximal portions of the extremities of 139 patients with trauma were evaluated with helical CT arteriography. CT arteriograms were interpreted on site by the radiologist in charge of emergency procedures and retrospectively with consensus interpretation between two radiologists. CT study quality and the presence of arterial injuries were noted. CT arteriographic findings were compared with those of surgery, conventional arteriography, and/or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Five (3.6%) patients had nondiagnostic studies and underwent conventional arteriography. In the remaining 137 arterial segments in 134 patients, helical CT arteriography demonstrated arterial injuries in 61 segments and normal arteries in 76 segments. These segments were treated initially with surgery (55 segments) or endovascular intervention (four segments) or were observed (78 segments); 77 of the 78 observed segments remained stable at 3-18 months (mean follow-up, 5.2 months). There were no differences between the on-site and consensus interpretations (K = 1.0). The sensitivity of CT arteriography was 95.1%, and the specificity was 98.7%. CONCLUSION: Helical CT arteriography can be performed as the initial diagnostic method in most patients suspected to have focal arterial injuries of the proximal portions of the extremities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)188-194
Number of pages7
JournalRadiology
Volume218
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Angiography
Extremities
Wounds and Injuries
Emergencies
Arteries
Radiologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Soto, J. A., Múnera, F., Morales, C., Lopera, J. E., Holguín, D., Guarín, O., ... García, G. (2001). Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: Helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis1. Radiology, 218(1), 188-194.

Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities : Helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis1. / Soto, J. A.; Múnera, F.; Morales, C.; Lopera, Jorge E; Holguín, D.; Guarín, O.; Castrillón, G.; Sanabria, A.; García, G.

In: Radiology, Vol. 218, No. 1, 2001, p. 188-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soto, JA, Múnera, F, Morales, C, Lopera, JE, Holguín, D, Guarín, O, Castrillón, G, Sanabria, A & García, G 2001, 'Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: Helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis1', Radiology, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 188-194.
Soto JA, Múnera F, Morales C, Lopera JE, Holguín D, Guarín O et al. Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: Helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis1. Radiology. 2001;218(1):188-194.
Soto, J. A. ; Múnera, F. ; Morales, C. ; Lopera, Jorge E ; Holguín, D. ; Guarín, O. ; Castrillón, G. ; Sanabria, A. ; García, G. / Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities : Helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis1. In: Radiology. 2001 ; Vol. 218, No. 1. pp. 188-194.
@article{2d35efb4660a42e995853a00c4680a9a,
title = "Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities: Helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis1",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To present our experience with helical computed tomographic (CT) arteriography as the initial diagnostic examination in patients suspected to have focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 19 months, 142 arterial segments in the proximal portions of the extremities of 139 patients with trauma were evaluated with helical CT arteriography. CT arteriograms were interpreted on site by the radiologist in charge of emergency procedures and retrospectively with consensus interpretation between two radiologists. CT study quality and the presence of arterial injuries were noted. CT arteriographic findings were compared with those of surgery, conventional arteriography, and/or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Five (3.6{\%}) patients had nondiagnostic studies and underwent conventional arteriography. In the remaining 137 arterial segments in 134 patients, helical CT arteriography demonstrated arterial injuries in 61 segments and normal arteries in 76 segments. These segments were treated initially with surgery (55 segments) or endovascular intervention (four segments) or were observed (78 segments); 77 of the 78 observed segments remained stable at 3-18 months (mean follow-up, 5.2 months). There were no differences between the on-site and consensus interpretations (K = 1.0). The sensitivity of CT arteriography was 95.1{\%}, and the specificity was 98.7{\%}. CONCLUSION: Helical CT arteriography can be performed as the initial diagnostic method in most patients suspected to have focal arterial injuries of the proximal portions of the extremities.",
author = "Soto, {J. A.} and F. M{\'u}nera and C. Morales and Lopera, {Jorge E} and D. Holgu{\'i}n and O. Guar{\'i}n and G. Castrill{\'o}n and A. Sanabria and G. Garc{\'i}a",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "218",
pages = "188--194",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities

T2 - Helical CT arteriography as the initial method of diagnosis1

AU - Soto, J. A.

AU - Múnera, F.

AU - Morales, C.

AU - Lopera, Jorge E

AU - Holguín, D.

AU - Guarín, O.

AU - Castrillón, G.

AU - Sanabria, A.

AU - García, G.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - PURPOSE: To present our experience with helical computed tomographic (CT) arteriography as the initial diagnostic examination in patients suspected to have focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 19 months, 142 arterial segments in the proximal portions of the extremities of 139 patients with trauma were evaluated with helical CT arteriography. CT arteriograms were interpreted on site by the radiologist in charge of emergency procedures and retrospectively with consensus interpretation between two radiologists. CT study quality and the presence of arterial injuries were noted. CT arteriographic findings were compared with those of surgery, conventional arteriography, and/or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Five (3.6%) patients had nondiagnostic studies and underwent conventional arteriography. In the remaining 137 arterial segments in 134 patients, helical CT arteriography demonstrated arterial injuries in 61 segments and normal arteries in 76 segments. These segments were treated initially with surgery (55 segments) or endovascular intervention (four segments) or were observed (78 segments); 77 of the 78 observed segments remained stable at 3-18 months (mean follow-up, 5.2 months). There were no differences between the on-site and consensus interpretations (K = 1.0). The sensitivity of CT arteriography was 95.1%, and the specificity was 98.7%. CONCLUSION: Helical CT arteriography can be performed as the initial diagnostic method in most patients suspected to have focal arterial injuries of the proximal portions of the extremities.

AB - PURPOSE: To present our experience with helical computed tomographic (CT) arteriography as the initial diagnostic examination in patients suspected to have focal arterial injuries of the proximal extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 19 months, 142 arterial segments in the proximal portions of the extremities of 139 patients with trauma were evaluated with helical CT arteriography. CT arteriograms were interpreted on site by the radiologist in charge of emergency procedures and retrospectively with consensus interpretation between two radiologists. CT study quality and the presence of arterial injuries were noted. CT arteriographic findings were compared with those of surgery, conventional arteriography, and/or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Five (3.6%) patients had nondiagnostic studies and underwent conventional arteriography. In the remaining 137 arterial segments in 134 patients, helical CT arteriography demonstrated arterial injuries in 61 segments and normal arteries in 76 segments. These segments were treated initially with surgery (55 segments) or endovascular intervention (four segments) or were observed (78 segments); 77 of the 78 observed segments remained stable at 3-18 months (mean follow-up, 5.2 months). There were no differences between the on-site and consensus interpretations (K = 1.0). The sensitivity of CT arteriography was 95.1%, and the specificity was 98.7%. CONCLUSION: Helical CT arteriography can be performed as the initial diagnostic method in most patients suspected to have focal arterial injuries of the proximal portions of the extremities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035135062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035135062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11152800

AN - SCOPUS:0035135062

VL - 218

SP - 188

EP - 194

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1

ER -