Fibromyalgia consensus report: Additional comments

Muhammad B. Yunus, Robert M. Bennett, Thomas J. Romano, I. Jon Russell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Some controversy has been generated by the consensus report on fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) published in 1996 (1). The current paper examines this report and offers some additional perspectives on several issues. The consensus report was based primarily on scientific data and provided useful information on various aspects of FMS. However, it is felt that some views, e.g., those on diagnosis in a work or compensation setting, causality, and management may be misinterpreted to the detriment of patient care. Our viewpoint in this paper states that both research data and clinical experience should be used to meaningfully address different aspects of FMS covered in the consensus report. Furthermore, because of continued research in FMS, the finite time limitations of the original report compiled in June of 1994, should be recognized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-327
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Rheumatology
Volume3
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1997

Keywords

  • Causality
  • Consensus report
  • Controversy
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fibromyalgia consensus report: Additional comments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this