Executive Function in Self-Neglecting Adult Protective Services Referrals Compared with Elder Psychiatric Outpatients

Jason Schillerstrom, Ricardo Salazar, Heather Regwan, Rebecca J. Bonugli, Donald R Royall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Psychometric performance, with an emphasis on executive function, was compared between adult protective services (APS) clients referred for a decision-making capacity consultation and elders seen in an outpatient geriatric psychiatry clinic. METHODS:: The authors performed a retrospective medical records review extracting general, executive, and visuospatial cognitive performance and depression symptom burden in APS referrals (N = 63) and geriatric psychiatry outpatients (N = 58). RESULTS: After adjusting for age and education, APS clients had worse mean executive performance as measured by the Executive Interview (24.3 [SD 6.4] versus 17.3 [SD 7.6], F[1, 87] 15.7, p <0.001) and CLOX1 (7.4 [SD 4.0] versus 9.3 [SD 4.2], F[1, 92] 4.79, p = 0.03). There were no differences in visuospatial or general cognitive abilities. The self-neglect subgroup had worse cognitive performance on each measure than other APS referrals. Conclusions: Compared with routine geriatric psychiatry patients, APS referrals are more likely to be executively impaired but less depressed. General cognitive screens do not distinguish these two groups. 2009 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)907-910
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume17
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Executive Function
Geriatric Psychiatry
Psychiatry
Outpatients
Referral and Consultation
Aptitude
Psychometrics
Medical Records
Decision Making
Interviews
Depression
Education

Keywords

  • Adult protective services
  • Depression
  • Executive function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Executive Function in Self-Neglecting Adult Protective Services Referrals Compared with Elder Psychiatric Outpatients. / Schillerstrom, Jason; Salazar, Ricardo; Regwan, Heather; Bonugli, Rebecca J.; Royall, Donald R.

In: American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 17, No. 10, 10.2009, p. 907-910.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c608db7193794bf9b8625c20f0e4321c,
title = "Executive Function in Self-Neglecting Adult Protective Services Referrals Compared with Elder Psychiatric Outpatients",
abstract = "Objective: Psychometric performance, with an emphasis on executive function, was compared between adult protective services (APS) clients referred for a decision-making capacity consultation and elders seen in an outpatient geriatric psychiatry clinic. METHODS:: The authors performed a retrospective medical records review extracting general, executive, and visuospatial cognitive performance and depression symptom burden in APS referrals (N = 63) and geriatric psychiatry outpatients (N = 58). RESULTS: After adjusting for age and education, APS clients had worse mean executive performance as measured by the Executive Interview (24.3 [SD 6.4] versus 17.3 [SD 7.6], F[1, 87] 15.7, p <0.001) and CLOX1 (7.4 [SD 4.0] versus 9.3 [SD 4.2], F[1, 92] 4.79, p = 0.03). There were no differences in visuospatial or general cognitive abilities. The self-neglect subgroup had worse cognitive performance on each measure than other APS referrals. Conclusions: Compared with routine geriatric psychiatry patients, APS referrals are more likely to be executively impaired but less depressed. General cognitive screens do not distinguish these two groups. 2009 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.",
keywords = "Adult protective services, Depression, Executive function",
author = "Jason Schillerstrom and Ricardo Salazar and Heather Regwan and Bonugli, {Rebecca J.} and Royall, {Donald R}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181b4bf64",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "907--910",
journal = "American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "1064-7481",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Executive Function in Self-Neglecting Adult Protective Services Referrals Compared with Elder Psychiatric Outpatients

AU - Schillerstrom, Jason

AU - Salazar, Ricardo

AU - Regwan, Heather

AU - Bonugli, Rebecca J.

AU - Royall, Donald R

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Objective: Psychometric performance, with an emphasis on executive function, was compared between adult protective services (APS) clients referred for a decision-making capacity consultation and elders seen in an outpatient geriatric psychiatry clinic. METHODS:: The authors performed a retrospective medical records review extracting general, executive, and visuospatial cognitive performance and depression symptom burden in APS referrals (N = 63) and geriatric psychiatry outpatients (N = 58). RESULTS: After adjusting for age and education, APS clients had worse mean executive performance as measured by the Executive Interview (24.3 [SD 6.4] versus 17.3 [SD 7.6], F[1, 87] 15.7, p <0.001) and CLOX1 (7.4 [SD 4.0] versus 9.3 [SD 4.2], F[1, 92] 4.79, p = 0.03). There were no differences in visuospatial or general cognitive abilities. The self-neglect subgroup had worse cognitive performance on each measure than other APS referrals. Conclusions: Compared with routine geriatric psychiatry patients, APS referrals are more likely to be executively impaired but less depressed. General cognitive screens do not distinguish these two groups. 2009 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

AB - Objective: Psychometric performance, with an emphasis on executive function, was compared between adult protective services (APS) clients referred for a decision-making capacity consultation and elders seen in an outpatient geriatric psychiatry clinic. METHODS:: The authors performed a retrospective medical records review extracting general, executive, and visuospatial cognitive performance and depression symptom burden in APS referrals (N = 63) and geriatric psychiatry outpatients (N = 58). RESULTS: After adjusting for age and education, APS clients had worse mean executive performance as measured by the Executive Interview (24.3 [SD 6.4] versus 17.3 [SD 7.6], F[1, 87] 15.7, p <0.001) and CLOX1 (7.4 [SD 4.0] versus 9.3 [SD 4.2], F[1, 92] 4.79, p = 0.03). There were no differences in visuospatial or general cognitive abilities. The self-neglect subgroup had worse cognitive performance on each measure than other APS referrals. Conclusions: Compared with routine geriatric psychiatry patients, APS referrals are more likely to be executively impaired but less depressed. General cognitive screens do not distinguish these two groups. 2009 American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

KW - Adult protective services

KW - Depression

KW - Executive function

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349676050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349676050&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181b4bf64

DO - 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181b4bf64

M3 - Article

C2 - 19910879

AN - SCOPUS:70349676050

VL - 17

SP - 907

EP - 910

JO - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 1064-7481

IS - 10

ER -