Evidence that multiple genes influence baseline concentrations and diet response of Lp(a) in baboons

David L. Rainwater, Candace M. Kammerer, John L. VandeBerg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the response of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels to dietary fat and cholesterol in 633 baboons fed a series of 3 diets: a basal diet low in cholesterol and fat, a high-fat diet, and a diet high in fat and cholesterol. Measurement of serum concentrations in samples taken while the baboons were sequentially fed the 3 diets allowed us to analyze 3 Lp(a) variables: Lp(a)(Basal), Lp(a)(RF) (response to increased dietary fat), and Lp(a)(RC) (response to increased dietary cholesterol in the high-fat environment). On average, Lp(a) concentrations significantly increased 6% and 28%, respectively, when dietary fat and cholesterol were increased (P<0.001). As expected, most of the variation in Lp(a)(Basal) was influenced by genes (h2=0.881). However, less than half of the variation in Lp(a)(RC) was influenced by genes (h2=0.347, P<0.0001), whereas the increase due to dietary fat alone was not significantly heritable (h2=0.043, P=0.28). To determine whether Lp(a) phenotypic variation was due to variation in LPA, the locus encoding the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] protein, we conducted linkage analyses by using LPA genotypes inferred from the apo(a) isoform phenotypes. All of the genetic variance in Lp(a)(Basal) concentration was linked to the LPA locus (log of the odds [LAD] score was 30.5). In contrast, linkage analyses revealed that genetic variance in Lp(a)(RC) was not linked to the LPA locus (LOD score was 0.036, P>0.5). To begin identifying the non-LPA genes that influence the Lp(a) response to dietary cholesterol, we tested, in bivariate quantitative genetic analyses, for correlation with low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDLC; ie, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol less the cholesterol contribution from Lp(a)]. LDLC(Basal) was weakly correlated with Lp(a)(Basal) (ρ(P)=0.018). However, LDLC(RC) and Lp(a)(RC) were strongly correlated (ρ(P)=0.382), and partitioning the correlations revealed significant genetic and environmental correlations (ρ(G)=0.587 and ρ(E)=0.251, respectively). The results suggest that increasing both dietary fat and dietary cholesterol caused significant increases in Lp(a) concentrations and that the response to dietary cholesterol was mediated by a gene or suite of genes that appears to exert pleiotropic effects on LDLC levels as well. The gene(s) influencing Lp(a) response to dietary cholesterol is not linked to the LPA locus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2696-2700
Number of pages5
JournalArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Volume19
Issue number11
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lipoprotein(a)
Papio
Dietary Cholesterol
Diet
Genes
Dietary Fats
Cholesterol
High Fat Diet
Fats
LDL Cholesterol

Keywords

  • Apo(a)
  • Baboons
  • Genetics
  • Lp(a)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Evidence that multiple genes influence baseline concentrations and diet response of Lp(a) in baboons. / Rainwater, David L.; Kammerer, Candace M.; VandeBerg, John L.

In: Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, Vol. 19, No. 11, 1999, p. 2696-2700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rainwater, David L. ; Kammerer, Candace M. ; VandeBerg, John L. / Evidence that multiple genes influence baseline concentrations and diet response of Lp(a) in baboons. In: Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 1999 ; Vol. 19, No. 11. pp. 2696-2700.
@article{68e8cd42f5ce4a199a48d61ce9499fcd,
title = "Evidence that multiple genes influence baseline concentrations and diet response of Lp(a) in baboons",
abstract = "We investigated the response of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels to dietary fat and cholesterol in 633 baboons fed a series of 3 diets: a basal diet low in cholesterol and fat, a high-fat diet, and a diet high in fat and cholesterol. Measurement of serum concentrations in samples taken while the baboons were sequentially fed the 3 diets allowed us to analyze 3 Lp(a) variables: Lp(a)(Basal), Lp(a)(RF) (response to increased dietary fat), and Lp(a)(RC) (response to increased dietary cholesterol in the high-fat environment). On average, Lp(a) concentrations significantly increased 6{\%} and 28{\%}, respectively, when dietary fat and cholesterol were increased (P<0.001). As expected, most of the variation in Lp(a)(Basal) was influenced by genes (h2=0.881). However, less than half of the variation in Lp(a)(RC) was influenced by genes (h2=0.347, P<0.0001), whereas the increase due to dietary fat alone was not significantly heritable (h2=0.043, P=0.28). To determine whether Lp(a) phenotypic variation was due to variation in LPA, the locus encoding the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] protein, we conducted linkage analyses by using LPA genotypes inferred from the apo(a) isoform phenotypes. All of the genetic variance in Lp(a)(Basal) concentration was linked to the LPA locus (log of the odds [LAD] score was 30.5). In contrast, linkage analyses revealed that genetic variance in Lp(a)(RC) was not linked to the LPA locus (LOD score was 0.036, P>0.5). To begin identifying the non-LPA genes that influence the Lp(a) response to dietary cholesterol, we tested, in bivariate quantitative genetic analyses, for correlation with low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDLC; ie, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol less the cholesterol contribution from Lp(a)]. LDLC(Basal) was weakly correlated with Lp(a)(Basal) (ρ(P)=0.018). However, LDLC(RC) and Lp(a)(RC) were strongly correlated (ρ(P)=0.382), and partitioning the correlations revealed significant genetic and environmental correlations (ρ(G)=0.587 and ρ(E)=0.251, respectively). The results suggest that increasing both dietary fat and dietary cholesterol caused significant increases in Lp(a) concentrations and that the response to dietary cholesterol was mediated by a gene or suite of genes that appears to exert pleiotropic effects on LDLC levels as well. The gene(s) influencing Lp(a) response to dietary cholesterol is not linked to the LPA locus.",
keywords = "Apo(a), Baboons, Genetics, Lp(a)",
author = "Rainwater, {David L.} and Kammerer, {Candace M.} and VandeBerg, {John L.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "2696--2700",
journal = "Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology",
issn = "1079-5642",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence that multiple genes influence baseline concentrations and diet response of Lp(a) in baboons

AU - Rainwater, David L.

AU - Kammerer, Candace M.

AU - VandeBerg, John L.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - We investigated the response of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels to dietary fat and cholesterol in 633 baboons fed a series of 3 diets: a basal diet low in cholesterol and fat, a high-fat diet, and a diet high in fat and cholesterol. Measurement of serum concentrations in samples taken while the baboons were sequentially fed the 3 diets allowed us to analyze 3 Lp(a) variables: Lp(a)(Basal), Lp(a)(RF) (response to increased dietary fat), and Lp(a)(RC) (response to increased dietary cholesterol in the high-fat environment). On average, Lp(a) concentrations significantly increased 6% and 28%, respectively, when dietary fat and cholesterol were increased (P<0.001). As expected, most of the variation in Lp(a)(Basal) was influenced by genes (h2=0.881). However, less than half of the variation in Lp(a)(RC) was influenced by genes (h2=0.347, P<0.0001), whereas the increase due to dietary fat alone was not significantly heritable (h2=0.043, P=0.28). To determine whether Lp(a) phenotypic variation was due to variation in LPA, the locus encoding the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] protein, we conducted linkage analyses by using LPA genotypes inferred from the apo(a) isoform phenotypes. All of the genetic variance in Lp(a)(Basal) concentration was linked to the LPA locus (log of the odds [LAD] score was 30.5). In contrast, linkage analyses revealed that genetic variance in Lp(a)(RC) was not linked to the LPA locus (LOD score was 0.036, P>0.5). To begin identifying the non-LPA genes that influence the Lp(a) response to dietary cholesterol, we tested, in bivariate quantitative genetic analyses, for correlation with low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDLC; ie, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol less the cholesterol contribution from Lp(a)]. LDLC(Basal) was weakly correlated with Lp(a)(Basal) (ρ(P)=0.018). However, LDLC(RC) and Lp(a)(RC) were strongly correlated (ρ(P)=0.382), and partitioning the correlations revealed significant genetic and environmental correlations (ρ(G)=0.587 and ρ(E)=0.251, respectively). The results suggest that increasing both dietary fat and dietary cholesterol caused significant increases in Lp(a) concentrations and that the response to dietary cholesterol was mediated by a gene or suite of genes that appears to exert pleiotropic effects on LDLC levels as well. The gene(s) influencing Lp(a) response to dietary cholesterol is not linked to the LPA locus.

AB - We investigated the response of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels to dietary fat and cholesterol in 633 baboons fed a series of 3 diets: a basal diet low in cholesterol and fat, a high-fat diet, and a diet high in fat and cholesterol. Measurement of serum concentrations in samples taken while the baboons were sequentially fed the 3 diets allowed us to analyze 3 Lp(a) variables: Lp(a)(Basal), Lp(a)(RF) (response to increased dietary fat), and Lp(a)(RC) (response to increased dietary cholesterol in the high-fat environment). On average, Lp(a) concentrations significantly increased 6% and 28%, respectively, when dietary fat and cholesterol were increased (P<0.001). As expected, most of the variation in Lp(a)(Basal) was influenced by genes (h2=0.881). However, less than half of the variation in Lp(a)(RC) was influenced by genes (h2=0.347, P<0.0001), whereas the increase due to dietary fat alone was not significantly heritable (h2=0.043, P=0.28). To determine whether Lp(a) phenotypic variation was due to variation in LPA, the locus encoding the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] protein, we conducted linkage analyses by using LPA genotypes inferred from the apo(a) isoform phenotypes. All of the genetic variance in Lp(a)(Basal) concentration was linked to the LPA locus (log of the odds [LAD] score was 30.5). In contrast, linkage analyses revealed that genetic variance in Lp(a)(RC) was not linked to the LPA locus (LOD score was 0.036, P>0.5). To begin identifying the non-LPA genes that influence the Lp(a) response to dietary cholesterol, we tested, in bivariate quantitative genetic analyses, for correlation with low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDLC; ie, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol less the cholesterol contribution from Lp(a)]. LDLC(Basal) was weakly correlated with Lp(a)(Basal) (ρ(P)=0.018). However, LDLC(RC) and Lp(a)(RC) were strongly correlated (ρ(P)=0.382), and partitioning the correlations revealed significant genetic and environmental correlations (ρ(G)=0.587 and ρ(E)=0.251, respectively). The results suggest that increasing both dietary fat and dietary cholesterol caused significant increases in Lp(a) concentrations and that the response to dietary cholesterol was mediated by a gene or suite of genes that appears to exert pleiotropic effects on LDLC levels as well. The gene(s) influencing Lp(a) response to dietary cholesterol is not linked to the LPA locus.

KW - Apo(a)

KW - Baboons

KW - Genetics

KW - Lp(a)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032718546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032718546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10559013

AN - SCOPUS:0032718546

VL - 19

SP - 2696

EP - 2700

JO - Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

JF - Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

SN - 1079-5642

IS - 11

ER -