Evaluation of two flexible colonoscopy simulators and transfer of skills into clinical practice

Pedro Pablo Gomez, Ross Willis, Kent R Van Sickle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Surgical residents have learned flexible endoscopy by practicing on patients in hospital settings under the strict guidance of experienced surgeons. Simulation is often used to "pretrain" novices on endoscopic skills before real clinical practice; nonetheless, the optimal method of training remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare endoscopic virtual reality and physical model simulators and their respective roles in transferring skills to the clinical environment. Methods At the beginning of a skills development rotation, 27 surgical postgraduate year 1 residents performed a baseline screening colonoscopy on a real patient under faculty supervision. Their performances were scored using the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES). Subsequently, interns completed a 3-week flexible endoscopy curriculum developed at our institution. One-third of the residents were assigned to train with the GI Mentor simulator, one-third trained with the Kyoto simulator, and one-third of the residents trained using both simulators. At the end of their rotations, each postgraduate year 1 resident performed one posttest colonoscopy on a different patient and was again scored using GAGES by an experienced faculty. Results A statistically significant improvement in the GAGES total score (p < 0.001) and on each of its subcomponents (p = 0.001) was observed from pretest to posttest for all groups combined. Subgroup analysis indicated that trainees in the GI Mentor or both simulators conditions showed significant improvement from pretest to posttest in terms of GAGES total score (p = 0.017 vs 0.024, respectively). This was not observed for those exclusively using the Kyoto platform (p = 0.072). Nonetheless, no single training condition was shown to be a better training modality when compared to others in terms of total GAGES score or in any of its subcomponents. Conclusion Colonoscopy simulator training with the GI Mentor platform exclusively or in combination with a physical model simulator improves skill performance in real colonoscopy cases when measured with the GAGES tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number977
Pages (from-to)220-227
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
Volume72
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Clinical Competence
Colonoscopy
Mentors
resident
evaluation
Endoscopy
Curriculum
virtual reality
trainee
performance
supervision
curriculum
simulation
Group

Keywords

  • flexible endoscopy
  • GAGES
  • simulation
  • skills assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education

Cite this

Evaluation of two flexible colonoscopy simulators and transfer of skills into clinical practice. / Gomez, Pedro Pablo; Willis, Ross; Van Sickle, Kent R.

In: Journal of Surgical Education, Vol. 72, No. 2, 977, 01.03.2015, p. 220-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gomez, Pedro Pablo ; Willis, Ross ; Van Sickle, Kent R. / Evaluation of two flexible colonoscopy simulators and transfer of skills into clinical practice. In: Journal of Surgical Education. 2015 ; Vol. 72, No. 2. pp. 220-227.
@article{12e91702d7034809b28df2c01643e9af,
title = "Evaluation of two flexible colonoscopy simulators and transfer of skills into clinical practice",
abstract = "Introduction Surgical residents have learned flexible endoscopy by practicing on patients in hospital settings under the strict guidance of experienced surgeons. Simulation is often used to {"}pretrain{"} novices on endoscopic skills before real clinical practice; nonetheless, the optimal method of training remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare endoscopic virtual reality and physical model simulators and their respective roles in transferring skills to the clinical environment. Methods At the beginning of a skills development rotation, 27 surgical postgraduate year 1 residents performed a baseline screening colonoscopy on a real patient under faculty supervision. Their performances were scored using the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES). Subsequently, interns completed a 3-week flexible endoscopy curriculum developed at our institution. One-third of the residents were assigned to train with the GI Mentor simulator, one-third trained with the Kyoto simulator, and one-third of the residents trained using both simulators. At the end of their rotations, each postgraduate year 1 resident performed one posttest colonoscopy on a different patient and was again scored using GAGES by an experienced faculty. Results A statistically significant improvement in the GAGES total score (p < 0.001) and on each of its subcomponents (p = 0.001) was observed from pretest to posttest for all groups combined. Subgroup analysis indicated that trainees in the GI Mentor or both simulators conditions showed significant improvement from pretest to posttest in terms of GAGES total score (p = 0.017 vs 0.024, respectively). This was not observed for those exclusively using the Kyoto platform (p = 0.072). Nonetheless, no single training condition was shown to be a better training modality when compared to others in terms of total GAGES score or in any of its subcomponents. Conclusion Colonoscopy simulator training with the GI Mentor platform exclusively or in combination with a physical model simulator improves skill performance in real colonoscopy cases when measured with the GAGES tool.",
keywords = "flexible endoscopy, GAGES, simulation, skills assessment",
author = "Gomez, {Pedro Pablo} and Ross Willis and {Van Sickle}, {Kent R}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "220--227",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Education",
issn = "1931-7204",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of two flexible colonoscopy simulators and transfer of skills into clinical practice

AU - Gomez, Pedro Pablo

AU - Willis, Ross

AU - Van Sickle, Kent R

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Introduction Surgical residents have learned flexible endoscopy by practicing on patients in hospital settings under the strict guidance of experienced surgeons. Simulation is often used to "pretrain" novices on endoscopic skills before real clinical practice; nonetheless, the optimal method of training remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare endoscopic virtual reality and physical model simulators and their respective roles in transferring skills to the clinical environment. Methods At the beginning of a skills development rotation, 27 surgical postgraduate year 1 residents performed a baseline screening colonoscopy on a real patient under faculty supervision. Their performances were scored using the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES). Subsequently, interns completed a 3-week flexible endoscopy curriculum developed at our institution. One-third of the residents were assigned to train with the GI Mentor simulator, one-third trained with the Kyoto simulator, and one-third of the residents trained using both simulators. At the end of their rotations, each postgraduate year 1 resident performed one posttest colonoscopy on a different patient and was again scored using GAGES by an experienced faculty. Results A statistically significant improvement in the GAGES total score (p < 0.001) and on each of its subcomponents (p = 0.001) was observed from pretest to posttest for all groups combined. Subgroup analysis indicated that trainees in the GI Mentor or both simulators conditions showed significant improvement from pretest to posttest in terms of GAGES total score (p = 0.017 vs 0.024, respectively). This was not observed for those exclusively using the Kyoto platform (p = 0.072). Nonetheless, no single training condition was shown to be a better training modality when compared to others in terms of total GAGES score or in any of its subcomponents. Conclusion Colonoscopy simulator training with the GI Mentor platform exclusively or in combination with a physical model simulator improves skill performance in real colonoscopy cases when measured with the GAGES tool.

AB - Introduction Surgical residents have learned flexible endoscopy by practicing on patients in hospital settings under the strict guidance of experienced surgeons. Simulation is often used to "pretrain" novices on endoscopic skills before real clinical practice; nonetheless, the optimal method of training remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare endoscopic virtual reality and physical model simulators and their respective roles in transferring skills to the clinical environment. Methods At the beginning of a skills development rotation, 27 surgical postgraduate year 1 residents performed a baseline screening colonoscopy on a real patient under faculty supervision. Their performances were scored using the Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES). Subsequently, interns completed a 3-week flexible endoscopy curriculum developed at our institution. One-third of the residents were assigned to train with the GI Mentor simulator, one-third trained with the Kyoto simulator, and one-third of the residents trained using both simulators. At the end of their rotations, each postgraduate year 1 resident performed one posttest colonoscopy on a different patient and was again scored using GAGES by an experienced faculty. Results A statistically significant improvement in the GAGES total score (p < 0.001) and on each of its subcomponents (p = 0.001) was observed from pretest to posttest for all groups combined. Subgroup analysis indicated that trainees in the GI Mentor or both simulators conditions showed significant improvement from pretest to posttest in terms of GAGES total score (p = 0.017 vs 0.024, respectively). This was not observed for those exclusively using the Kyoto platform (p = 0.072). Nonetheless, no single training condition was shown to be a better training modality when compared to others in terms of total GAGES score or in any of its subcomponents. Conclusion Colonoscopy simulator training with the GI Mentor platform exclusively or in combination with a physical model simulator improves skill performance in real colonoscopy cases when measured with the GAGES tool.

KW - flexible endoscopy

KW - GAGES

KW - simulation

KW - skills assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925091689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925091689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 25239553

AN - SCOPUS:84925091689

VL - 72

SP - 220

EP - 227

JO - Journal of Surgical Education

JF - Journal of Surgical Education

SN - 1931-7204

IS - 2

M1 - 977

ER -