Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability: A clinical trial

Pilar Valderrama, Thomas W. Oates, Archie A Jones, James Simpson, John D. Schoolfield, David L Cochran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) provides a non-invasive assessment of implant stability. The established RFA device uses electronic technology, whereas a recently developed device uses magnetic technology. The goal of this clinical trial was to evaluate the ability of the magnetic RFA device to detect changes in stability during early healing following implant placement and to determine whether the implant stability quatient (ISQ) values obtained correlated with those made with the electronic device. Methods: RFA assessments were performed using electronic- and magnetic-based devices on 34 non-submerged titanium dental implants in 17 patients. Each patient received two implants in the posterior maxilla or mandible. Implant stability was measured at placement and weekly until week 6, when implants received provisional crowns, and at 12 weeks, when definitive crowns were cemented. During each visit, measurements were taken three times and averaged to obtain a single representative ISQ for each device. Results: At placement, the mean ISQ obtained with the electronic device was 61.9 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 59.4 to 64.3); it increased to 63.2 (95% Cl, 61.2 to 65.2) at 12 weeks. With the magnetic device, the mean ISQs were 70.6 (95% Cl, 68.4 to 72.8) and 75.9 (95% Cl, 74.2 to 77.7), respectively. Both devices indicated a pattern of decreased mean stability from 1 to 3 weeks post-placement, small fluctuations in mean ISQ from 3 to 6 weeks, and significantly increased mean stability from 6 to 12 weeks. For the complete set of implant measures across all weeks, the paired electronic and magnetic ISQ values correlated significantly (r = 0.52; P<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that changes in implant stability measured with the newer magnetic device correlate well with those found with the electronic device. Both devices confirmed the initial decreases in implant stability that occur following placement and identified an increase in stability during the first 6 weeks of functional loading.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)262-272
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Periodontology
Volume78
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

Clinical Trials
Equipment and Supplies
Crowns
Technology
Dental Implants
Maxilla
Titanium
Mandible
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Bone
  • Clinical trial
  • Dental implants
  • Healing
  • Implant stability
  • Resonance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability : A clinical trial. / Valderrama, Pilar; Oates, Thomas W.; Jones, Archie A; Simpson, James; Schoolfield, John D.; Cochran, David L.

In: Journal of Periodontology, Vol. 78, No. 2, 02.2007, p. 262-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valderrama, Pilar ; Oates, Thomas W. ; Jones, Archie A ; Simpson, James ; Schoolfield, John D. ; Cochran, David L. / Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability : A clinical trial. In: Journal of Periodontology. 2007 ; Vol. 78, No. 2. pp. 262-272.
@article{390a1a072214430b85a4af8b375e5131,
title = "Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability: A clinical trial",
abstract = "Background: Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) provides a non-invasive assessment of implant stability. The established RFA device uses electronic technology, whereas a recently developed device uses magnetic technology. The goal of this clinical trial was to evaluate the ability of the magnetic RFA device to detect changes in stability during early healing following implant placement and to determine whether the implant stability quatient (ISQ) values obtained correlated with those made with the electronic device. Methods: RFA assessments were performed using electronic- and magnetic-based devices on 34 non-submerged titanium dental implants in 17 patients. Each patient received two implants in the posterior maxilla or mandible. Implant stability was measured at placement and weekly until week 6, when implants received provisional crowns, and at 12 weeks, when definitive crowns were cemented. During each visit, measurements were taken three times and averaged to obtain a single representative ISQ for each device. Results: At placement, the mean ISQ obtained with the electronic device was 61.9 (95{\%} confidence interval [Cl], 59.4 to 64.3); it increased to 63.2 (95{\%} Cl, 61.2 to 65.2) at 12 weeks. With the magnetic device, the mean ISQs were 70.6 (95{\%} Cl, 68.4 to 72.8) and 75.9 (95{\%} Cl, 74.2 to 77.7), respectively. Both devices indicated a pattern of decreased mean stability from 1 to 3 weeks post-placement, small fluctuations in mean ISQ from 3 to 6 weeks, and significantly increased mean stability from 6 to 12 weeks. For the complete set of implant measures across all weeks, the paired electronic and magnetic ISQ values correlated significantly (r = 0.52; P<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that changes in implant stability measured with the newer magnetic device correlate well with those found with the electronic device. Both devices confirmed the initial decreases in implant stability that occur following placement and identified an increase in stability during the first 6 weeks of functional loading.",
keywords = "Bone, Clinical trial, Dental implants, Healing, Implant stability, Resonance",
author = "Pilar Valderrama and Oates, {Thomas W.} and Jones, {Archie A} and James Simpson and Schoolfield, {John D.} and Cochran, {David L}",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1902/jop.2007.060143",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "262--272",
journal = "Journal of Periodontology",
issn = "0022-3492",
publisher = "American Academy of Periodontology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability

T2 - A clinical trial

AU - Valderrama, Pilar

AU - Oates, Thomas W.

AU - Jones, Archie A

AU - Simpson, James

AU - Schoolfield, John D.

AU - Cochran, David L

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - Background: Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) provides a non-invasive assessment of implant stability. The established RFA device uses electronic technology, whereas a recently developed device uses magnetic technology. The goal of this clinical trial was to evaluate the ability of the magnetic RFA device to detect changes in stability during early healing following implant placement and to determine whether the implant stability quatient (ISQ) values obtained correlated with those made with the electronic device. Methods: RFA assessments were performed using electronic- and magnetic-based devices on 34 non-submerged titanium dental implants in 17 patients. Each patient received two implants in the posterior maxilla or mandible. Implant stability was measured at placement and weekly until week 6, when implants received provisional crowns, and at 12 weeks, when definitive crowns were cemented. During each visit, measurements were taken three times and averaged to obtain a single representative ISQ for each device. Results: At placement, the mean ISQ obtained with the electronic device was 61.9 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 59.4 to 64.3); it increased to 63.2 (95% Cl, 61.2 to 65.2) at 12 weeks. With the magnetic device, the mean ISQs were 70.6 (95% Cl, 68.4 to 72.8) and 75.9 (95% Cl, 74.2 to 77.7), respectively. Both devices indicated a pattern of decreased mean stability from 1 to 3 weeks post-placement, small fluctuations in mean ISQ from 3 to 6 weeks, and significantly increased mean stability from 6 to 12 weeks. For the complete set of implant measures across all weeks, the paired electronic and magnetic ISQ values correlated significantly (r = 0.52; P<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that changes in implant stability measured with the newer magnetic device correlate well with those found with the electronic device. Both devices confirmed the initial decreases in implant stability that occur following placement and identified an increase in stability during the first 6 weeks of functional loading.

AB - Background: Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) provides a non-invasive assessment of implant stability. The established RFA device uses electronic technology, whereas a recently developed device uses magnetic technology. The goal of this clinical trial was to evaluate the ability of the magnetic RFA device to detect changes in stability during early healing following implant placement and to determine whether the implant stability quatient (ISQ) values obtained correlated with those made with the electronic device. Methods: RFA assessments were performed using electronic- and magnetic-based devices on 34 non-submerged titanium dental implants in 17 patients. Each patient received two implants in the posterior maxilla or mandible. Implant stability was measured at placement and weekly until week 6, when implants received provisional crowns, and at 12 weeks, when definitive crowns were cemented. During each visit, measurements were taken three times and averaged to obtain a single representative ISQ for each device. Results: At placement, the mean ISQ obtained with the electronic device was 61.9 (95% confidence interval [Cl], 59.4 to 64.3); it increased to 63.2 (95% Cl, 61.2 to 65.2) at 12 weeks. With the magnetic device, the mean ISQs were 70.6 (95% Cl, 68.4 to 72.8) and 75.9 (95% Cl, 74.2 to 77.7), respectively. Both devices indicated a pattern of decreased mean stability from 1 to 3 weeks post-placement, small fluctuations in mean ISQ from 3 to 6 weeks, and significantly increased mean stability from 6 to 12 weeks. For the complete set of implant measures across all weeks, the paired electronic and magnetic ISQ values correlated significantly (r = 0.52; P<0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that changes in implant stability measured with the newer magnetic device correlate well with those found with the electronic device. Both devices confirmed the initial decreases in implant stability that occur following placement and identified an increase in stability during the first 6 weeks of functional loading.

KW - Bone

KW - Clinical trial

KW - Dental implants

KW - Healing

KW - Implant stability

KW - Resonance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847790159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847790159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1902/jop.2007.060143

DO - 10.1902/jop.2007.060143

M3 - Article

C2 - 17274715

AN - SCOPUS:33847790159

VL - 78

SP - 262

EP - 272

JO - Journal of Periodontology

JF - Journal of Periodontology

SN - 0022-3492

IS - 2

ER -