Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems

Hema Udupa, Peter Mah, Stephen B. Dove, William D. McDavid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to compare imaging properties of 20 intraoral digital systems objectively. Study Design Using a direct current x-ray source and a radiographic phantom, a series of radiographs was made from the lowest exposure time until the sensor saturated. Images were captured and stored. Incident exposures were measured using a radiation meter. Gray scale, spatial resolution, and contrast/detail detectability were evaluated. Presence of 7 distinct steps spanning the gray levels from 0 to 255 was used to define the exposure latitude. An "optimal" exposure, the lowest exposure where maximum spatial resolution and contrast/detail detectability were achieved, was determined. Results The systems varied greatly in latitude, "optimal" exposure, and image quality. This may not be readily apparent to the naked eye or when clinical images are compared. Conclusions Objective assessment of image quality with a quality assurance tool makes it possible to evaluate and compare the various intraoral digital systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)774-783
Number of pages10
JournalOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Volume116
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Imaging Phantoms
X-Rays
Radiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Dentistry (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems. / Udupa, Hema; Mah, Peter; Dove, Stephen B.; McDavid, William D.

In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, Vol. 116, No. 6, 12.2013, p. 774-783.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Udupa, Hema ; Mah, Peter ; Dove, Stephen B. ; McDavid, William D. / Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems. In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2013 ; Vol. 116, No. 6. pp. 774-783.
@article{d3e1a1d09abb42d8a84942eb1a0a9ef3,
title = "Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems",
abstract = "Objective The aim of this study was to compare imaging properties of 20 intraoral digital systems objectively. Study Design Using a direct current x-ray source and a radiographic phantom, a series of radiographs was made from the lowest exposure time until the sensor saturated. Images were captured and stored. Incident exposures were measured using a radiation meter. Gray scale, spatial resolution, and contrast/detail detectability were evaluated. Presence of 7 distinct steps spanning the gray levels from 0 to 255 was used to define the exposure latitude. An {"}optimal{"} exposure, the lowest exposure where maximum spatial resolution and contrast/detail detectability were achieved, was determined. Results The systems varied greatly in latitude, {"}optimal{"} exposure, and image quality. This may not be readily apparent to the naked eye or when clinical images are compared. Conclusions Objective assessment of image quality with a quality assurance tool makes it possible to evaluate and compare the various intraoral digital systems.",
author = "Hema Udupa and Peter Mah and Dove, {Stephen B.} and McDavid, {William D.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.oooo.2013.08.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "774--783",
journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology",
issn = "2212-4403",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems

AU - Udupa, Hema

AU - Mah, Peter

AU - Dove, Stephen B.

AU - McDavid, William D.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Objective The aim of this study was to compare imaging properties of 20 intraoral digital systems objectively. Study Design Using a direct current x-ray source and a radiographic phantom, a series of radiographs was made from the lowest exposure time until the sensor saturated. Images were captured and stored. Incident exposures were measured using a radiation meter. Gray scale, spatial resolution, and contrast/detail detectability were evaluated. Presence of 7 distinct steps spanning the gray levels from 0 to 255 was used to define the exposure latitude. An "optimal" exposure, the lowest exposure where maximum spatial resolution and contrast/detail detectability were achieved, was determined. Results The systems varied greatly in latitude, "optimal" exposure, and image quality. This may not be readily apparent to the naked eye or when clinical images are compared. Conclusions Objective assessment of image quality with a quality assurance tool makes it possible to evaluate and compare the various intraoral digital systems.

AB - Objective The aim of this study was to compare imaging properties of 20 intraoral digital systems objectively. Study Design Using a direct current x-ray source and a radiographic phantom, a series of radiographs was made from the lowest exposure time until the sensor saturated. Images were captured and stored. Incident exposures were measured using a radiation meter. Gray scale, spatial resolution, and contrast/detail detectability were evaluated. Presence of 7 distinct steps spanning the gray levels from 0 to 255 was used to define the exposure latitude. An "optimal" exposure, the lowest exposure where maximum spatial resolution and contrast/detail detectability were achieved, was determined. Results The systems varied greatly in latitude, "optimal" exposure, and image quality. This may not be readily apparent to the naked eye or when clinical images are compared. Conclusions Objective assessment of image quality with a quality assurance tool makes it possible to evaluate and compare the various intraoral digital systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887971650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887971650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.08.019

DO - 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.08.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 24237729

AN - SCOPUS:84887971650

VL - 116

SP - 774

EP - 783

JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

SN - 2212-4403

IS - 6

ER -