Evaluation of hemispheric dominance for language using functional MRI: A comparison with positron emission tomography

Jinhu Xiong, Shobini Rao, Jia Hong Gao, Marty Woldorff, Peter T Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The utility of a conventional (i.e., nonecho-planar) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technique to determine hemispheric dominance for language was assessed using a semantic generation task in which subjects were presented with a series of nouns and generated aloud a verb for each one. A direct comparison of the fMRI results with positron emission tomography (PET), acquired from the same subjects, was also performed. When analyzed by group averaging, the results of this work were in concordance with those of previous PET studies, showing a left hemispheric dominance for language. Analyzed on an individual basis, 7 out of 9 subjects were left-hemisphere dominant and 2 subjects were right-hemisphere dominant; this applied with both PET and fMRI methods. The direct comparison between PET and fMRI further demonstrated that fMRI can replicate PET findings. Of the total activation foci detected by PET, 92% were observed by fMRI. On the other hand, fMRI reported 64% more activations than did PET. This may reflect differences in procedure, spatial resolution, sensitivity, and the underlying physiological mechanism between PET and fMRI. This study suggests that the fMRI technique, even using conventional MRI scanners, could be clinically useful in evaluating hemispheric dominance for language on an individual subject-by- subject basis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-58
Number of pages17
JournalHuman Brain Mapping
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Positron-Emission Tomography
Language
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Semantics

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • FMRI
  • Hemispheric dominance
  • Language
  • Lateralization
  • PET

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Evaluation of hemispheric dominance for language using functional MRI : A comparison with positron emission tomography. / Xiong, Jinhu; Rao, Shobini; Gao, Jia Hong; Woldorff, Marty; Fox, Peter T.

In: Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1998, p. 42-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Xiong, Jinhu ; Rao, Shobini ; Gao, Jia Hong ; Woldorff, Marty ; Fox, Peter T. / Evaluation of hemispheric dominance for language using functional MRI : A comparison with positron emission tomography. In: Human Brain Mapping. 1998 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 42-58.
@article{a21805d04ea348009a3f42b0c29c2625,
title = "Evaluation of hemispheric dominance for language using functional MRI: A comparison with positron emission tomography",
abstract = "The utility of a conventional (i.e., nonecho-planar) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technique to determine hemispheric dominance for language was assessed using a semantic generation task in which subjects were presented with a series of nouns and generated aloud a verb for each one. A direct comparison of the fMRI results with positron emission tomography (PET), acquired from the same subjects, was also performed. When analyzed by group averaging, the results of this work were in concordance with those of previous PET studies, showing a left hemispheric dominance for language. Analyzed on an individual basis, 7 out of 9 subjects were left-hemisphere dominant and 2 subjects were right-hemisphere dominant; this applied with both PET and fMRI methods. The direct comparison between PET and fMRI further demonstrated that fMRI can replicate PET findings. Of the total activation foci detected by PET, 92{\%} were observed by fMRI. On the other hand, fMRI reported 64{\%} more activations than did PET. This may reflect differences in procedure, spatial resolution, sensitivity, and the underlying physiological mechanism between PET and fMRI. This study suggests that the fMRI technique, even using conventional MRI scanners, could be clinically useful in evaluating hemispheric dominance for language on an individual subject-by- subject basis.",
keywords = "Cognition, FMRI, Hemispheric dominance, Language, Lateralization, PET",
author = "Jinhu Xiong and Shobini Rao and Gao, {Jia Hong} and Marty Woldorff and Fox, {Peter T}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:1<42::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-L",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "42--58",
journal = "Human Brain Mapping",
issn = "1065-9471",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of hemispheric dominance for language using functional MRI

T2 - A comparison with positron emission tomography

AU - Xiong, Jinhu

AU - Rao, Shobini

AU - Gao, Jia Hong

AU - Woldorff, Marty

AU - Fox, Peter T

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The utility of a conventional (i.e., nonecho-planar) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technique to determine hemispheric dominance for language was assessed using a semantic generation task in which subjects were presented with a series of nouns and generated aloud a verb for each one. A direct comparison of the fMRI results with positron emission tomography (PET), acquired from the same subjects, was also performed. When analyzed by group averaging, the results of this work were in concordance with those of previous PET studies, showing a left hemispheric dominance for language. Analyzed on an individual basis, 7 out of 9 subjects were left-hemisphere dominant and 2 subjects were right-hemisphere dominant; this applied with both PET and fMRI methods. The direct comparison between PET and fMRI further demonstrated that fMRI can replicate PET findings. Of the total activation foci detected by PET, 92% were observed by fMRI. On the other hand, fMRI reported 64% more activations than did PET. This may reflect differences in procedure, spatial resolution, sensitivity, and the underlying physiological mechanism between PET and fMRI. This study suggests that the fMRI technique, even using conventional MRI scanners, could be clinically useful in evaluating hemispheric dominance for language on an individual subject-by- subject basis.

AB - The utility of a conventional (i.e., nonecho-planar) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technique to determine hemispheric dominance for language was assessed using a semantic generation task in which subjects were presented with a series of nouns and generated aloud a verb for each one. A direct comparison of the fMRI results with positron emission tomography (PET), acquired from the same subjects, was also performed. When analyzed by group averaging, the results of this work were in concordance with those of previous PET studies, showing a left hemispheric dominance for language. Analyzed on an individual basis, 7 out of 9 subjects were left-hemisphere dominant and 2 subjects were right-hemisphere dominant; this applied with both PET and fMRI methods. The direct comparison between PET and fMRI further demonstrated that fMRI can replicate PET findings. Of the total activation foci detected by PET, 92% were observed by fMRI. On the other hand, fMRI reported 64% more activations than did PET. This may reflect differences in procedure, spatial resolution, sensitivity, and the underlying physiological mechanism between PET and fMRI. This study suggests that the fMRI technique, even using conventional MRI scanners, could be clinically useful in evaluating hemispheric dominance for language on an individual subject-by- subject basis.

KW - Cognition

KW - FMRI

KW - Hemispheric dominance

KW - Language

KW - Lateralization

KW - PET

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031912455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031912455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:1<42::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-L

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:1<42::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-L

M3 - Article

C2 - 9673662

AN - SCOPUS:0031912455

VL - 6

SP - 42

EP - 58

JO - Human Brain Mapping

JF - Human Brain Mapping

SN - 1065-9471

IS - 1

ER -