Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with and without ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Christopher J. Walker, Thomas J. Prihoda, Brian L Mealey, David J Lasho, Marcel E Noujeim, Guy Huynh-ba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To date, limited evidence is available specifically evaluating ridge preservation (RP) and implant placement in molar sites. The primary aim of this study is to radiographically compare alveolar ridge changes with and without RP with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: This parallel, two-arm randomized clinical trial included 40 patients evenly distributed between two treatment groups. After molar extraction, sites were allowed to heal naturally or received RP with freeze-dried bone allograft covered by a non-resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. CBCT scans were taken immediately and 3 months postextraction, and then a dental implant was placed. Width and height measurements were made radiographically. Results: Significantly greater loss in alveolar ridge height was found in molar sites allowed to heal without RP on the buccal aspect of the socket (RP: -1.12 - 1.60 mm versus no RP: -2.60 - 2.06 mm, P = 0.01). No significant difference in ridge width loss was found between groups. Two-thirds ridge width reduction was experienced on the buccal aspect in sites without RP, but width loss was evenly distributed between buccal and lingual aspects when RP was performed. Bone grafting at time of placement was required in 25% of implants in the group without RP versus 10% of implants in the RP group. Conclusions: In molar extraction sites without RP, significantly more reduction in ridge height occurred, and the majority of ridge width loss was localized to the buccal aspect. When RP was performed, ridge width loss was not significantly decreased, but the loss was evenly distributed between facial and lingual aspects of the extraction site.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-249
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Periodontology
Volume88
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Cheek
Randomized Controlled Trials
Alveolar Process
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Tongue
Dental Implants
Bone Transplantation
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Allografts
Arm
Bone and Bones
Membranes
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Allografts
  • Bone
  • Cone beam computed tomography
  • Dental implants
  • Molar
  • Tooth extraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Periodontics

Cite this

Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with and without ridge preservation : A randomized controlled clinical trial. / Walker, Christopher J.; Prihoda, Thomas J.; Mealey, Brian L; Lasho, David J; Noujeim, Marcel E; Huynh-ba, Guy.

In: Journal of Periodontology, Vol. 88, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 241-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Walker, Christopher J. ; Prihoda, Thomas J. ; Mealey, Brian L ; Lasho, David J ; Noujeim, Marcel E ; Huynh-ba, Guy. / Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with and without ridge preservation : A randomized controlled clinical trial. In: Journal of Periodontology. 2017 ; Vol. 88, No. 3. pp. 241-249.
@article{9c4c2894d87c4279b9af5b58e30bde0d,
title = "Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with and without ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial",
abstract = "Background: To date, limited evidence is available specifically evaluating ridge preservation (RP) and implant placement in molar sites. The primary aim of this study is to radiographically compare alveolar ridge changes with and without RP with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: This parallel, two-arm randomized clinical trial included 40 patients evenly distributed between two treatment groups. After molar extraction, sites were allowed to heal naturally or received RP with freeze-dried bone allograft covered by a non-resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. CBCT scans were taken immediately and 3 months postextraction, and then a dental implant was placed. Width and height measurements were made radiographically. Results: Significantly greater loss in alveolar ridge height was found in molar sites allowed to heal without RP on the buccal aspect of the socket (RP: -1.12 - 1.60 mm versus no RP: -2.60 - 2.06 mm, P = 0.01). No significant difference in ridge width loss was found between groups. Two-thirds ridge width reduction was experienced on the buccal aspect in sites without RP, but width loss was evenly distributed between buccal and lingual aspects when RP was performed. Bone grafting at time of placement was required in 25{\%} of implants in the group without RP versus 10{\%} of implants in the RP group. Conclusions: In molar extraction sites without RP, significantly more reduction in ridge height occurred, and the majority of ridge width loss was localized to the buccal aspect. When RP was performed, ridge width loss was not significantly decreased, but the loss was evenly distributed between facial and lingual aspects of the extraction site.",
keywords = "Allografts, Bone, Cone beam computed tomography, Dental implants, Molar, Tooth extraction",
author = "Walker, {Christopher J.} and Prihoda, {Thomas J.} and Mealey, {Brian L} and Lasho, {David J} and Noujeim, {Marcel E} and Guy Huynh-ba",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1902/jop.2016.160445",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "241--249",
journal = "Journal of Periodontology",
issn = "0022-3492",
publisher = "American Academy of Periodontology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of healing at molar extraction sites with and without ridge preservation

T2 - A randomized controlled clinical trial

AU - Walker, Christopher J.

AU - Prihoda, Thomas J.

AU - Mealey, Brian L

AU - Lasho, David J

AU - Noujeim, Marcel E

AU - Huynh-ba, Guy

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background: To date, limited evidence is available specifically evaluating ridge preservation (RP) and implant placement in molar sites. The primary aim of this study is to radiographically compare alveolar ridge changes with and without RP with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: This parallel, two-arm randomized clinical trial included 40 patients evenly distributed between two treatment groups. After molar extraction, sites were allowed to heal naturally or received RP with freeze-dried bone allograft covered by a non-resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. CBCT scans were taken immediately and 3 months postextraction, and then a dental implant was placed. Width and height measurements were made radiographically. Results: Significantly greater loss in alveolar ridge height was found in molar sites allowed to heal without RP on the buccal aspect of the socket (RP: -1.12 - 1.60 mm versus no RP: -2.60 - 2.06 mm, P = 0.01). No significant difference in ridge width loss was found between groups. Two-thirds ridge width reduction was experienced on the buccal aspect in sites without RP, but width loss was evenly distributed between buccal and lingual aspects when RP was performed. Bone grafting at time of placement was required in 25% of implants in the group without RP versus 10% of implants in the RP group. Conclusions: In molar extraction sites without RP, significantly more reduction in ridge height occurred, and the majority of ridge width loss was localized to the buccal aspect. When RP was performed, ridge width loss was not significantly decreased, but the loss was evenly distributed between facial and lingual aspects of the extraction site.

AB - Background: To date, limited evidence is available specifically evaluating ridge preservation (RP) and implant placement in molar sites. The primary aim of this study is to radiographically compare alveolar ridge changes with and without RP with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: This parallel, two-arm randomized clinical trial included 40 patients evenly distributed between two treatment groups. After molar extraction, sites were allowed to heal naturally or received RP with freeze-dried bone allograft covered by a non-resorbable dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. CBCT scans were taken immediately and 3 months postextraction, and then a dental implant was placed. Width and height measurements were made radiographically. Results: Significantly greater loss in alveolar ridge height was found in molar sites allowed to heal without RP on the buccal aspect of the socket (RP: -1.12 - 1.60 mm versus no RP: -2.60 - 2.06 mm, P = 0.01). No significant difference in ridge width loss was found between groups. Two-thirds ridge width reduction was experienced on the buccal aspect in sites without RP, but width loss was evenly distributed between buccal and lingual aspects when RP was performed. Bone grafting at time of placement was required in 25% of implants in the group without RP versus 10% of implants in the RP group. Conclusions: In molar extraction sites without RP, significantly more reduction in ridge height occurred, and the majority of ridge width loss was localized to the buccal aspect. When RP was performed, ridge width loss was not significantly decreased, but the loss was evenly distributed between facial and lingual aspects of the extraction site.

KW - Allografts

KW - Bone

KW - Cone beam computed tomography

KW - Dental implants

KW - Molar

KW - Tooth extraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014340186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014340186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1902/jop.2016.160445

DO - 10.1902/jop.2016.160445

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85014340186

VL - 88

SP - 241

EP - 249

JO - Journal of Periodontology

JF - Journal of Periodontology

SN - 0022-3492

IS - 3

ER -