Evaluation of 3 dental unit waterline contamination testing methods

Nuala Porteous, Yuyu Sun, John Schoolfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies have found inconsistent results from testing methods used to measure heterotrophic plate count (HPC) bacteria in dental unit waterline (DUWL) samples. This study used 63 samples to compare the results obtained from an in-office chairside method and 2 currently used commercial laboratory HPC methods (Standard Methods 9215C and 9215E). The results suggest that the Standard Method 9215E is not suitable for application to DUWL quality monitoring, due to the detection of limited numbers of heterotrophic organisms at the required 35°C incubation temperature. The results also confirm that while the in-office chairside method is useful for DUWL quality monitoring, the Standard Method 9215C provided the most accurate results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-47
Number of pages7
JournalGeneral Dentistry
Volume63
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Tooth
Bacteria
Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Porteous, N., Sun, Y., & Schoolfield, J. (2015). Evaluation of 3 dental unit waterline contamination testing methods. General Dentistry, 63(1), 41-47.

Evaluation of 3 dental unit waterline contamination testing methods. / Porteous, Nuala; Sun, Yuyu; Schoolfield, John.

In: General Dentistry, Vol. 63, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 41-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Porteous, N, Sun, Y & Schoolfield, J 2015, 'Evaluation of 3 dental unit waterline contamination testing methods', General Dentistry, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 41-47.
Porteous N, Sun Y, Schoolfield J. Evaluation of 3 dental unit waterline contamination testing methods. General Dentistry. 2015 Jan 1;63(1):41-47.
Porteous, Nuala ; Sun, Yuyu ; Schoolfield, John. / Evaluation of 3 dental unit waterline contamination testing methods. In: General Dentistry. 2015 ; Vol. 63, No. 1. pp. 41-47.
@article{e53cef7ffe6f488393657c98e5835e92,
title = "Evaluation of 3 dental unit waterline contamination testing methods",
abstract = "Previous studies have found inconsistent results from testing methods used to measure heterotrophic plate count (HPC) bacteria in dental unit waterline (DUWL) samples. This study used 63 samples to compare the results obtained from an in-office chairside method and 2 currently used commercial laboratory HPC methods (Standard Methods 9215C and 9215E). The results suggest that the Standard Method 9215E is not suitable for application to DUWL quality monitoring, due to the detection of limited numbers of heterotrophic organisms at the required 35°C incubation temperature. The results also confirm that while the in-office chairside method is useful for DUWL quality monitoring, the Standard Method 9215C provided the most accurate results.",
author = "Nuala Porteous and Yuyu Sun and John Schoolfield",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "41--47",
journal = "General Dentistry",
issn = "0363-6771",
publisher = "Academy of General Dentistry",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of 3 dental unit waterline contamination testing methods

AU - Porteous, Nuala

AU - Sun, Yuyu

AU - Schoolfield, John

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Previous studies have found inconsistent results from testing methods used to measure heterotrophic plate count (HPC) bacteria in dental unit waterline (DUWL) samples. This study used 63 samples to compare the results obtained from an in-office chairside method and 2 currently used commercial laboratory HPC methods (Standard Methods 9215C and 9215E). The results suggest that the Standard Method 9215E is not suitable for application to DUWL quality monitoring, due to the detection of limited numbers of heterotrophic organisms at the required 35°C incubation temperature. The results also confirm that while the in-office chairside method is useful for DUWL quality monitoring, the Standard Method 9215C provided the most accurate results.

AB - Previous studies have found inconsistent results from testing methods used to measure heterotrophic plate count (HPC) bacteria in dental unit waterline (DUWL) samples. This study used 63 samples to compare the results obtained from an in-office chairside method and 2 currently used commercial laboratory HPC methods (Standard Methods 9215C and 9215E). The results suggest that the Standard Method 9215E is not suitable for application to DUWL quality monitoring, due to the detection of limited numbers of heterotrophic organisms at the required 35°C incubation temperature. The results also confirm that while the in-office chairside method is useful for DUWL quality monitoring, the Standard Method 9215C provided the most accurate results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920603491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920603491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 25574718

AN - SCOPUS:84920603491

VL - 63

SP - 41

EP - 47

JO - General Dentistry

JF - General Dentistry

SN - 0363-6771

IS - 1

ER -