TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancing the technology of clinical trials and the trials model to evaluate newly developed, targeted antidepressants
AU - Katz, Martin M.
AU - Halbreich, Uriel M.
AU - Bowden, Charles L.
AU - Frazer, Alan
AU - Pinder, Roger M.
AU - Rush, A. John
AU - Wheatley, David P.
AU - Lebowitz, Barry D.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2002/9
Y1 - 2002/9
N2 - Concern about disappointing results from recent multi-center trials of new antidepressants prompted several ACNP workshops on "improving the technology of clinical trials." The workshops focused on technical problems, such as patient screening, reliability of clinical ratings, and the role of the placebo control. They aimed to determine how to more effectively apply the current clinical trials model for evaluating antidepressant drugs. The problems confronting the field of clinical trials, however, extend beyond technology. They also included conceptual issues concerning changes in the understanding of depressive disorders and of the multiple actions of antidepressant drugs. Such problems have been further complicated by the rapidly changing field of drug development itself, which is continually refining the targeting of new antidepressant agents. Drugs are increasingly being developed to try to change specific behavioral facets more rapidly and may be less likely, therefore, to act initially on "whole" disorders. To address such issues, a symposium was held in Rhodes in 2000 that focused on such conceptual changes with the goal of developing recommendations to revise the clinical evaluation model. Its purpose was to integrate new knowledge on depression and the mechanisms of action of antidepressant drugs toward developing more efficient methods of drug development. Since the evaluation process will eventually require changes in governmental policy, senior staff from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) participated as well as members of academia, industry and clinical practice. Recommendations for altering clinical trial methodology were made in four areas: patient selection, methodology of evaluation, measuring onset of action, and FDA and NIMH perspectives on current practice. This article discusses these four areas and presents the consensus of the panel participants.
AB - Concern about disappointing results from recent multi-center trials of new antidepressants prompted several ACNP workshops on "improving the technology of clinical trials." The workshops focused on technical problems, such as patient screening, reliability of clinical ratings, and the role of the placebo control. They aimed to determine how to more effectively apply the current clinical trials model for evaluating antidepressant drugs. The problems confronting the field of clinical trials, however, extend beyond technology. They also included conceptual issues concerning changes in the understanding of depressive disorders and of the multiple actions of antidepressant drugs. Such problems have been further complicated by the rapidly changing field of drug development itself, which is continually refining the targeting of new antidepressant agents. Drugs are increasingly being developed to try to change specific behavioral facets more rapidly and may be less likely, therefore, to act initially on "whole" disorders. To address such issues, a symposium was held in Rhodes in 2000 that focused on such conceptual changes with the goal of developing recommendations to revise the clinical evaluation model. Its purpose was to integrate new knowledge on depression and the mechanisms of action of antidepressant drugs toward developing more efficient methods of drug development. Since the evaluation process will eventually require changes in governmental policy, senior staff from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) participated as well as members of academia, industry and clinical practice. Recommendations for altering clinical trial methodology were made in four areas: patient selection, methodology of evaluation, measuring onset of action, and FDA and NIMH perspectives on current practice. This article discusses these four areas and presents the consensus of the panel participants.
KW - Antidepressant
KW - Antidepressant drug development
KW - Clinical methodology
KW - Clinical trial
KW - Componential behavioral approach
KW - Onset of drug action
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036710689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036710689&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00329-9
DO - 10.1016/S0893-133X(02)00329-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 12225690
AN - SCOPUS:0036710689
SN - 0893-133X
VL - 27
SP - 319
EP - 328
JO - Neuropsychopharmacology
JF - Neuropsychopharmacology
IS - 3
ER -