Eligibility for magnetic resonance imaging screening in the United Kingdom: Effect of strict selection criteria and anonymous DNA testing on breast cancer incidence in the MARIBS study

D. Gareth R. Evans, Fiona Lennard, Linda J. Pointon, Susan J. Ramus, Simon A. Gayther, Nayanta Sodha, Gek E. Kwan-Lim, Martin O. Leach, Ruth Warren, Deborah Thompson, Douglas F. Easton, Rosalind Eeles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: A UK multicenter study compared the performance of contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging with X-Ray Mammography in women at highriskof breast cancer commencing in 1997. Selection criteria were used to identify women with at least 0.9% annual riskof breast cancer. Methods: Women at high breast cancer risk, with a strong family history and/or high probability of a BRCA1/BRCA2/TP53 mutation, were recruited from 22 centers. Those not known as gene carriers were asked to give a blood sample, which was tested anonymously for mutations. Women ages 35 to 49 years were offered annual screening for 2 to 7 years. Study eligibility at entry was assessed retrospectively by detailed examination of pedigrees and overall eligibility accounting for computer riskassessment and mutation results. Results: Seventy-eight of 837 (9%) women entered for screening were ineligible using the strict entry criteria. Thirty-nine cancers were detected in 1,869 women-years in study (incidence 21 per 1,000). Including 3,561 further years follow-up, 28 more breast cancers were identified (12 of 1,000). Incidence rates for 759 eligible women were 22 of 1,000 in study and 13 of 1,000 in total follow-up, compared with 9 of 1,000 and 4 of 1,000, respectively, in 78 ineligible women. Breast cancer rates were higher for BRCA2 than BRCA1 after testing anonymized samples in this selected population at 65 of 1,000 in study and 36 of 1,000 in total follow-up for BRCA2 compared with 44 of 1,000 and 27 of 1,000 for BRCA1. Conclusions: Strict enforcement of study criteria would have minimally improved the power of the study, whereas testing for BRCA1/2 in advance would have substantially increased the detection rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2123-2131
Number of pages9
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Eligibility for magnetic resonance imaging screening in the United Kingdom: Effect of strict selection criteria and anonymous DNA testing on breast cancer incidence in the MARIBS study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this