Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial

  • Francois Clement Bidard
  • , Virginia G. Kaklamani
  • , Patrick Neven
  • , Guillermo Streich
  • , Alberto J. Montero
  • , Frédéric Forget
  • , Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier
  • , Joo Hyuk Sohn
  • , Donatienne Taylor
  • , Kathleen K. Harnden
  • , Hung Khong
  • , Judit Kocsis
  • , Florence Dalenc
  • , Patrick M. Dillon
  • , Sunil Babu
  • , Simon Waters
  • , Ines Deleu
  • , José A. García Sáenz
  • , Emilio Bria
  • , Marina Cazzaniga
  • Janice Lu, Philippe Aftimos, Javier Cortés, Shubin Liu, Giulia Tonini, Dirk Laurent, Nassir Habboubi, Maureen G. Conlan, Aditya Bardia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

531 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSEPatients with pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer have poor prognosis. Elacestrant is a novel, oral selective ER degrader that demonstrated activity in early studies.METHODSThis randomized, open-label, phase III trial enrolled patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had one-two lines of endocrine therapy, required pretreatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and ≤ 1 chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant 400 mg orally once daily or standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine monotherapy. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review in all patients and patients with detectable ESR1 mutations.RESULTSPatients were randomly assigned to elacestrant (n = 239) or SOC (n = 238). ESR1 mutation was detected in 47.8% of patients, and 43.4% received two prior endocrine therapies. PFS was prolonged in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88; P =.002) and patients with ESR1 mutation (hazard ratio = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; P =.0005). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7.2% receiving elacestrant and 3.1% receiving SOC. Treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuations were 3.4% in the elacestrant arm versus 0.9% in SOC. Nausea of any grade occurred in 35.0% receiving elacestrant and 18.8% receiving SOC (grade 3/4, 2.5% and 0.9%, respectively).CONCLUSIONElacestrant is the first oral selective ER degrader demonstrating a significant PFS improvement versus SOC both in the overall population and in patients with ESR1 mutations with manageable safety in a phase III trial for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberJCO.22.00338
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume32
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this