Effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy during mechanical ventilation in a lung model

R. W. Lawson, Jay I Peters, D. C. Shelledy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objectives: To evaluate the effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) on delivered volumes and pressures during mechanical ventilation, utilizing a lung model. Design: Bench study. Setting: Laboratory. Materials and methods: Using varying-sized endotracheal tubes (ETTs), we ventilated a lung model at two levels of compliance utilizing different modes and parameters of ventilation. After establishing baseline measurements, the bronchoscope was inserted and measurements repeated. Measurements and results: During controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) with a preset high-pressure limit (HPL), tidal volumes (VTs) were reduced from 700 mL to 0 to 500 mL following insertion of the bronchoscope. Increasing the HPL to 120 cm H2O resulted in a VT of 40 to 680 mL. Changing from square to decelerating flow waveform resulted in no consistent difference in VT. Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) of 0 to 41 cm H2O was present under most conditions. Higher rates and lower peak inspiratory flows were associated with higher levels of auto-PEEP. In the pressure-control (PC) mode, using a preset inspiratory pressure level (IP), VT was reduced from 700 mL to 40 to 280 mL following insertion of the bronchoscope. Maximum IP (100 cm H2O) increased VT to 260 to 700 mL. Auto-PEEP was less in the PC mode. Conclusions: Extreme care must be taken when bronchoscopy is performed on a patient receiving mechanical ventilation. Extremely low VT and significant auto-PEEP may develop unless flow, respiratory rate, mode, and ETT size are carefully selected. The PC mode delivered more volume than did the CMV mode. When performing FOB during mechanical ventilation, the inside diameter of the ETT should be ≥ 2.0-mm larger than the outside diameter of the bronchoscope to maintain volume delivery and minimize the development of auto-PEEP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)824-831
Number of pages8
JournalChest
Volume118
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Bronchoscopy
Artificial Respiration
Bronchoscopes
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Pressure
Lung
Intrinsic Positive-Pressure Respiration
Tidal Volume
Respiratory Rate
Ventilation

Keywords

  • Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure
  • Bronchoscopy
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Peak inspiratory pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy during mechanical ventilation in a lung model. / Lawson, R. W.; Peters, Jay I; Shelledy, D. C.

In: Chest, Vol. 118, No. 3, 2000, p. 824-831.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lawson, RW, Peters, JI & Shelledy, DC 2000, 'Effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy during mechanical ventilation in a lung model', Chest, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 824-831.
Lawson, R. W. ; Peters, Jay I ; Shelledy, D. C. / Effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy during mechanical ventilation in a lung model. In: Chest. 2000 ; Vol. 118, No. 3. pp. 824-831.
@article{a40d01f510124800b27b14cc0d946621,
title = "Effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy during mechanical ventilation in a lung model",
abstract = "Study objectives: To evaluate the effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) on delivered volumes and pressures during mechanical ventilation, utilizing a lung model. Design: Bench study. Setting: Laboratory. Materials and methods: Using varying-sized endotracheal tubes (ETTs), we ventilated a lung model at two levels of compliance utilizing different modes and parameters of ventilation. After establishing baseline measurements, the bronchoscope was inserted and measurements repeated. Measurements and results: During controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) with a preset high-pressure limit (HPL), tidal volumes (VTs) were reduced from 700 mL to 0 to 500 mL following insertion of the bronchoscope. Increasing the HPL to 120 cm H2O resulted in a VT of 40 to 680 mL. Changing from square to decelerating flow waveform resulted in no consistent difference in VT. Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) of 0 to 41 cm H2O was present under most conditions. Higher rates and lower peak inspiratory flows were associated with higher levels of auto-PEEP. In the pressure-control (PC) mode, using a preset inspiratory pressure level (IP), VT was reduced from 700 mL to 40 to 280 mL following insertion of the bronchoscope. Maximum IP (100 cm H2O) increased VT to 260 to 700 mL. Auto-PEEP was less in the PC mode. Conclusions: Extreme care must be taken when bronchoscopy is performed on a patient receiving mechanical ventilation. Extremely low VT and significant auto-PEEP may develop unless flow, respiratory rate, mode, and ETT size are carefully selected. The PC mode delivered more volume than did the CMV mode. When performing FOB during mechanical ventilation, the inside diameter of the ETT should be ≥ 2.0-mm larger than the outside diameter of the bronchoscope to maintain volume delivery and minimize the development of auto-PEEP.",
keywords = "Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure, Bronchoscopy, Mechanical ventilation, Peak inspiratory pressure",
author = "Lawson, {R. W.} and Peters, {Jay I} and Shelledy, {D. C.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "824--831",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy during mechanical ventilation in a lung model

AU - Lawson, R. W.

AU - Peters, Jay I

AU - Shelledy, D. C.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Study objectives: To evaluate the effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) on delivered volumes and pressures during mechanical ventilation, utilizing a lung model. Design: Bench study. Setting: Laboratory. Materials and methods: Using varying-sized endotracheal tubes (ETTs), we ventilated a lung model at two levels of compliance utilizing different modes and parameters of ventilation. After establishing baseline measurements, the bronchoscope was inserted and measurements repeated. Measurements and results: During controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) with a preset high-pressure limit (HPL), tidal volumes (VTs) were reduced from 700 mL to 0 to 500 mL following insertion of the bronchoscope. Increasing the HPL to 120 cm H2O resulted in a VT of 40 to 680 mL. Changing from square to decelerating flow waveform resulted in no consistent difference in VT. Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) of 0 to 41 cm H2O was present under most conditions. Higher rates and lower peak inspiratory flows were associated with higher levels of auto-PEEP. In the pressure-control (PC) mode, using a preset inspiratory pressure level (IP), VT was reduced from 700 mL to 40 to 280 mL following insertion of the bronchoscope. Maximum IP (100 cm H2O) increased VT to 260 to 700 mL. Auto-PEEP was less in the PC mode. Conclusions: Extreme care must be taken when bronchoscopy is performed on a patient receiving mechanical ventilation. Extremely low VT and significant auto-PEEP may develop unless flow, respiratory rate, mode, and ETT size are carefully selected. The PC mode delivered more volume than did the CMV mode. When performing FOB during mechanical ventilation, the inside diameter of the ETT should be ≥ 2.0-mm larger than the outside diameter of the bronchoscope to maintain volume delivery and minimize the development of auto-PEEP.

AB - Study objectives: To evaluate the effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) on delivered volumes and pressures during mechanical ventilation, utilizing a lung model. Design: Bench study. Setting: Laboratory. Materials and methods: Using varying-sized endotracheal tubes (ETTs), we ventilated a lung model at two levels of compliance utilizing different modes and parameters of ventilation. After establishing baseline measurements, the bronchoscope was inserted and measurements repeated. Measurements and results: During controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) with a preset high-pressure limit (HPL), tidal volumes (VTs) were reduced from 700 mL to 0 to 500 mL following insertion of the bronchoscope. Increasing the HPL to 120 cm H2O resulted in a VT of 40 to 680 mL. Changing from square to decelerating flow waveform resulted in no consistent difference in VT. Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) of 0 to 41 cm H2O was present under most conditions. Higher rates and lower peak inspiratory flows were associated with higher levels of auto-PEEP. In the pressure-control (PC) mode, using a preset inspiratory pressure level (IP), VT was reduced from 700 mL to 40 to 280 mL following insertion of the bronchoscope. Maximum IP (100 cm H2O) increased VT to 260 to 700 mL. Auto-PEEP was less in the PC mode. Conclusions: Extreme care must be taken when bronchoscopy is performed on a patient receiving mechanical ventilation. Extremely low VT and significant auto-PEEP may develop unless flow, respiratory rate, mode, and ETT size are carefully selected. The PC mode delivered more volume than did the CMV mode. When performing FOB during mechanical ventilation, the inside diameter of the ETT should be ≥ 2.0-mm larger than the outside diameter of the bronchoscope to maintain volume delivery and minimize the development of auto-PEEP.

KW - Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure

KW - Bronchoscopy

KW - Mechanical ventilation

KW - Peak inspiratory pressure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033797220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033797220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10988208

AN - SCOPUS:0033797220

VL - 118

SP - 824

EP - 831

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 3

ER -