Effects of amphetamine on delay discounting in rats depend upon the manner in which delay is varied

David R. Maguire, Cedric Henson, Charles P France

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whether stimulant drugs like amphetamine increase or decrease choice of larger delayed reinforcers over smaller immediately available reinforcers under delay discounting procedures can depend on several factors, including the order in which delay is presented. This study examined whether the order of delay presentation impacts drug effects on discounting in rats (n = 8) trained and tested under an ascending order, a descending order, as well as under a fixed delay condition. Responses on one lever delivered 1 food pellet immediately and responses on the other lever delivered 3 food pellets immediately or after a delay (4-32 s). In Experiment 1, the delay to the larger reinforcer varied within session and the order of delay presentation (ascending or descending) varied across conditions. In Experiment 2, the same delay value was presented in all blocks of the session (i.e., delay was fixed), and delay varied across conditions. Under the ascending order of delay, amphetamine (0.32-1.78 mg/kg) increased choice of the larger reinforcer in some rats and decreased choice in others. In the same rats responding under the descending and fixed delay conditions, amphetamine markedly decreased choice of the larger reinforcer even in the component associated with no delay. In some subjects, the effects of amphetamine differed depending on the manner in which delay was presented, indicating that drug-induced changes in performance were due, in part, to mechanisms other than altered sensitivity to reinforcer delay. These results also suggest that a history of responding under both orders of delay presentation can modulate drug effects. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-179
Number of pages7
JournalNeuropharmacology
Volume87
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Amphetamine
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Food
Delay Discounting

Keywords

  • Amphetamine
  • Delay discounting
  • Lever press
  • Order of delay presentation
  • Rat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Effects of amphetamine on delay discounting in rats depend upon the manner in which delay is varied. / Maguire, David R.; Henson, Cedric; France, Charles P.

In: Neuropharmacology, Vol. 87, 2014, p. 173-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77f05211fe9e4752a523dc0f1cee5dfd,
title = "Effects of amphetamine on delay discounting in rats depend upon the manner in which delay is varied",
abstract = "Whether stimulant drugs like amphetamine increase or decrease choice of larger delayed reinforcers over smaller immediately available reinforcers under delay discounting procedures can depend on several factors, including the order in which delay is presented. This study examined whether the order of delay presentation impacts drug effects on discounting in rats (n = 8) trained and tested under an ascending order, a descending order, as well as under a fixed delay condition. Responses on one lever delivered 1 food pellet immediately and responses on the other lever delivered 3 food pellets immediately or after a delay (4-32 s). In Experiment 1, the delay to the larger reinforcer varied within session and the order of delay presentation (ascending or descending) varied across conditions. In Experiment 2, the same delay value was presented in all blocks of the session (i.e., delay was fixed), and delay varied across conditions. Under the ascending order of delay, amphetamine (0.32-1.78 mg/kg) increased choice of the larger reinforcer in some rats and decreased choice in others. In the same rats responding under the descending and fixed delay conditions, amphetamine markedly decreased choice of the larger reinforcer even in the component associated with no delay. In some subjects, the effects of amphetamine differed depending on the manner in which delay was presented, indicating that drug-induced changes in performance were due, in part, to mechanisms other than altered sensitivity to reinforcer delay. These results also suggest that a history of responding under both orders of delay presentation can modulate drug effects. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'.",
keywords = "Amphetamine, Delay discounting, Lever press, Order of delay presentation, Rat",
author = "Maguire, {David R.} and Cedric Henson and France, {Charles P}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.04.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "173--179",
journal = "Neuropharmacology",
issn = "0028-3908",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of amphetamine on delay discounting in rats depend upon the manner in which delay is varied

AU - Maguire, David R.

AU - Henson, Cedric

AU - France, Charles P

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Whether stimulant drugs like amphetamine increase or decrease choice of larger delayed reinforcers over smaller immediately available reinforcers under delay discounting procedures can depend on several factors, including the order in which delay is presented. This study examined whether the order of delay presentation impacts drug effects on discounting in rats (n = 8) trained and tested under an ascending order, a descending order, as well as under a fixed delay condition. Responses on one lever delivered 1 food pellet immediately and responses on the other lever delivered 3 food pellets immediately or after a delay (4-32 s). In Experiment 1, the delay to the larger reinforcer varied within session and the order of delay presentation (ascending or descending) varied across conditions. In Experiment 2, the same delay value was presented in all blocks of the session (i.e., delay was fixed), and delay varied across conditions. Under the ascending order of delay, amphetamine (0.32-1.78 mg/kg) increased choice of the larger reinforcer in some rats and decreased choice in others. In the same rats responding under the descending and fixed delay conditions, amphetamine markedly decreased choice of the larger reinforcer even in the component associated with no delay. In some subjects, the effects of amphetamine differed depending on the manner in which delay was presented, indicating that drug-induced changes in performance were due, in part, to mechanisms other than altered sensitivity to reinforcer delay. These results also suggest that a history of responding under both orders of delay presentation can modulate drug effects. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'.

AB - Whether stimulant drugs like amphetamine increase or decrease choice of larger delayed reinforcers over smaller immediately available reinforcers under delay discounting procedures can depend on several factors, including the order in which delay is presented. This study examined whether the order of delay presentation impacts drug effects on discounting in rats (n = 8) trained and tested under an ascending order, a descending order, as well as under a fixed delay condition. Responses on one lever delivered 1 food pellet immediately and responses on the other lever delivered 3 food pellets immediately or after a delay (4-32 s). In Experiment 1, the delay to the larger reinforcer varied within session and the order of delay presentation (ascending or descending) varied across conditions. In Experiment 2, the same delay value was presented in all blocks of the session (i.e., delay was fixed), and delay varied across conditions. Under the ascending order of delay, amphetamine (0.32-1.78 mg/kg) increased choice of the larger reinforcer in some rats and decreased choice in others. In the same rats responding under the descending and fixed delay conditions, amphetamine markedly decreased choice of the larger reinforcer even in the component associated with no delay. In some subjects, the effects of amphetamine differed depending on the manner in which delay was presented, indicating that drug-induced changes in performance were due, in part, to mechanisms other than altered sensitivity to reinforcer delay. These results also suggest that a history of responding under both orders of delay presentation can modulate drug effects. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'.

KW - Amphetamine

KW - Delay discounting

KW - Lever press

KW - Order of delay presentation

KW - Rat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908502127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908502127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.04.012

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.04.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 24780379

AN - SCOPUS:84908502127

VL - 87

SP - 173

EP - 179

JO - Neuropharmacology

JF - Neuropharmacology

SN - 0028-3908

ER -