TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Depression on Dementia Presentation
T2 - Qualitative Assessment with the Qualitative Evaluation of Dementia (QED)
AU - Royall, Donald R.
AU - Mahurin, Roderick K.
AU - Cornell, John
PY - 1995/10
Y1 - 1995/10
N2 - Two novel, bedside, dementia assessment instruments, the Executive Interview (EXIT) and the Qualitative Evaluation of Dementia (QED) were used to examine the effects of DSM-111-R major depressive episodes on the clinical presentation of patients diagnosed with NINCDS “possible”AD. Intergroup comparisons were made of the various bedside cognitive measures given to 102 of 118 consecutive patients presenting to a university geriatric assessment clinic and consultation service. The assessment instruments used were: (1) the EXIT a Wminute, 25-item bedside interview for the assessment of executive control function (ECF); (2) the QED: a brief, clinically based checklist that operationalizes the approach of a geriatric psychiatrist to the qualitative assessment of dementing illnesses (when QED scores are mapped against EXIT scores, a qualitative picture-of dementia typology emerges); and (3) the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE): a familiar bedside measure of cognitive function. Depressed and nondepressed patients differed significantly on the QED. There was no overlap in the QED scores of patients with probable AD versus those with depression. The QED discriminated between depressed and nondepressed patients with possible AD. Possible AD patients with depression could not be qualitatively distinguished from those with depression alone, although they could be discriminated by the EXIT. Only 44% of possibleAD cases fall within the EXIT x QED 90% confidence limits for probable AD. No differences were found on either the QED or the MMSE between depressed non-AD patients and nondepressed patients exhibiting “dementia with no cortical features.” The MMSE was insensitive to cognitive impairment in non-AD cases. NINCDS “possible” AD is a qualitatively heterogeneous group. Depression alters the presentation ofAD, with depressed Alzheimer�s patients appearing qualitatively similar to other depressed patients, but with far more executive impairment. Patients with the “dementia of depression” cannot be qualitatively distinguished from those with subcortical dementias. The MMSE underestimates the level of executive cognitive impairment in qualitatively subcortical dementia. These distinctions can be made at the bedside through the combined use of the EXIT and the QED. (J Geriatr Psychiatry NeuroZl995; 8:4-11).
AB - Two novel, bedside, dementia assessment instruments, the Executive Interview (EXIT) and the Qualitative Evaluation of Dementia (QED) were used to examine the effects of DSM-111-R major depressive episodes on the clinical presentation of patients diagnosed with NINCDS “possible”AD. Intergroup comparisons were made of the various bedside cognitive measures given to 102 of 118 consecutive patients presenting to a university geriatric assessment clinic and consultation service. The assessment instruments used were: (1) the EXIT a Wminute, 25-item bedside interview for the assessment of executive control function (ECF); (2) the QED: a brief, clinically based checklist that operationalizes the approach of a geriatric psychiatrist to the qualitative assessment of dementing illnesses (when QED scores are mapped against EXIT scores, a qualitative picture-of dementia typology emerges); and (3) the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE): a familiar bedside measure of cognitive function. Depressed and nondepressed patients differed significantly on the QED. There was no overlap in the QED scores of patients with probable AD versus those with depression. The QED discriminated between depressed and nondepressed patients with possible AD. Possible AD patients with depression could not be qualitatively distinguished from those with depression alone, although they could be discriminated by the EXIT. Only 44% of possibleAD cases fall within the EXIT x QED 90% confidence limits for probable AD. No differences were found on either the QED or the MMSE between depressed non-AD patients and nondepressed patients exhibiting “dementia with no cortical features.” The MMSE was insensitive to cognitive impairment in non-AD cases. NINCDS “possible” AD is a qualitatively heterogeneous group. Depression alters the presentation ofAD, with depressed Alzheimer�s patients appearing qualitatively similar to other depressed patients, but with far more executive impairment. Patients with the “dementia of depression” cannot be qualitatively distinguished from those with subcortical dementias. The MMSE underestimates the level of executive cognitive impairment in qualitatively subcortical dementia. These distinctions can be made at the bedside through the combined use of the EXIT and the QED. (J Geriatr Psychiatry NeuroZl995; 8:4-11).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973207975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973207975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 7710646
AN - SCOPUS:84973207975
SN - 0891-9887
VL - 8
SP - 2
EP - 7
JO - Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
JF - Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
IS - 1
ER -