Dosimetric comparison between 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Courtney Buckey, Gregory P Swanson, Sotirios Stathakis, Nikos Papanikolaou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is considered by many to be the standard of care in the delivery of external-beam radiotherapy treatments to the prostate. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the purported benefits of IMRT. Materials and Methods: Treatment plans were produced for 10 patients using both 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and IMRT, utilising the dose constraints recommended by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0415 protocol. Three IMRT modalities used in this study were linear accelerator based IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and serial tomotherapy. The prescription to the target, 76 Gy, was the same for all plans. Results: In general the 3D-CRT plans satisfied the RTOG criteria for planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and met or bettered the dose criteria for the organs at risk. PTV coverage was more homogeneous for the IMRT plans than the 3D-CRT plans but not significantly improved. Conclusions: Technically, because the IMRT plans required greater effort for the optimisation, longer treatment times and higher monitor units, the use of IMRT for the fulfilment of the protocols dosimetric goals was not justified using these constraints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-85
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Radiotherapy in Practice
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Radiation Oncology
Organs at Risk
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Particle Accelerators
Standard of Care
Prescriptions
Prostate
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • 3D conformal
  • IMRT
  • Prostate cancer
  • radiotherapy
  • RTOG 0415

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Oncology

Cite this

Dosimetric comparison between 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. / Buckey, Courtney; Swanson, Gregory P; Stathakis, Sotirios; Papanikolaou, Nikos.

In: Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice, Vol. 9, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 77-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cbba9427383f4b7199c34a8622d34aeb,
title = "Dosimetric comparison between 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is considered by many to be the standard of care in the delivery of external-beam radiotherapy treatments to the prostate. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the purported benefits of IMRT. Materials and Methods: Treatment plans were produced for 10 patients using both 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and IMRT, utilising the dose constraints recommended by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0415 protocol. Three IMRT modalities used in this study were linear accelerator based IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and serial tomotherapy. The prescription to the target, 76 Gy, was the same for all plans. Results: In general the 3D-CRT plans satisfied the RTOG criteria for planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and met or bettered the dose criteria for the organs at risk. PTV coverage was more homogeneous for the IMRT plans than the 3D-CRT plans but not significantly improved. Conclusions: Technically, because the IMRT plans required greater effort for the optimisation, longer treatment times and higher monitor units, the use of IMRT for the fulfilment of the protocols dosimetric goals was not justified using these constraints.",
keywords = "3D conformal, IMRT, Prostate cancer, radiotherapy, RTOG 0415",
author = "Courtney Buckey and Swanson, {Gregory P} and Sotirios Stathakis and Nikos Papanikolaou",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1017/S1460396909990343",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "77--85",
journal = "Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice",
issn = "1460-3969",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dosimetric comparison between 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

AU - Buckey, Courtney

AU - Swanson, Gregory P

AU - Stathakis, Sotirios

AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Background and Purpose: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is considered by many to be the standard of care in the delivery of external-beam radiotherapy treatments to the prostate. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the purported benefits of IMRT. Materials and Methods: Treatment plans were produced for 10 patients using both 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and IMRT, utilising the dose constraints recommended by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0415 protocol. Three IMRT modalities used in this study were linear accelerator based IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and serial tomotherapy. The prescription to the target, 76 Gy, was the same for all plans. Results: In general the 3D-CRT plans satisfied the RTOG criteria for planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and met or bettered the dose criteria for the organs at risk. PTV coverage was more homogeneous for the IMRT plans than the 3D-CRT plans but not significantly improved. Conclusions: Technically, because the IMRT plans required greater effort for the optimisation, longer treatment times and higher monitor units, the use of IMRT for the fulfilment of the protocols dosimetric goals was not justified using these constraints.

AB - Background and Purpose: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is considered by many to be the standard of care in the delivery of external-beam radiotherapy treatments to the prostate. The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the purported benefits of IMRT. Materials and Methods: Treatment plans were produced for 10 patients using both 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and IMRT, utilising the dose constraints recommended by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0415 protocol. Three IMRT modalities used in this study were linear accelerator based IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and serial tomotherapy. The prescription to the target, 76 Gy, was the same for all plans. Results: In general the 3D-CRT plans satisfied the RTOG criteria for planning target volume (PTV) coverage, and met or bettered the dose criteria for the organs at risk. PTV coverage was more homogeneous for the IMRT plans than the 3D-CRT plans but not significantly improved. Conclusions: Technically, because the IMRT plans required greater effort for the optimisation, longer treatment times and higher monitor units, the use of IMRT for the fulfilment of the protocols dosimetric goals was not justified using these constraints.

KW - 3D conformal

KW - IMRT

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - radiotherapy

KW - RTOG 0415

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956294935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956294935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1460396909990343

DO - 10.1017/S1460396909990343

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956294935

VL - 9

SP - 77

EP - 85

JO - Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice

JF - Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice

SN - 1460-3969

IS - 2

ER -