TY - JOUR
T1 - Does spinal anesthesia lead to postoperative urinary retention in same-day urogynecology surgery? A retrospective review
AU - Alas, Alexandriah
AU - Hidalgo, Ryan
AU - Espaillat, Luis
AU - Devakumar, Hemikaa
AU - Davila, G. Willy
AU - Hurtado, Eric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The International Urogynecological Association.
PY - 2019/8/1
Y1 - 2019/8/1
N2 - Introduction and hypothesis: Spinal anesthesia has been reported to be a risk factor for postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in various surgical specialties. We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia was a risk factor for POUR after outpatient vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: This was a retrospective review of an urogynecology database for all outpatient POP vaginal surgeries performed in 2014 to evaluate the risk of POUR after general versus spinal anesthesia. A standardized voiding trial was performed by backfilling the bladder with 300 ml of saline. A successful trial was achieved if the patient voided two-thirds of the total volume instilled, confirmed by bladder ultrasound. Our primary outcome was to compare POUR requiring discharge with a Foley catheter between spinal and general anesthesia. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for variables with significance at p < 0.1 at the bivariate level. Results: A total of 177 procedures were included, 126 with general and 51 with spinal anesthesia. The overall POUR rate was 48.9%. Type of anesthesia was not a risk factor for POUR. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that age < 55 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31–11.7), diabetes (adjusted OR 4.18, 95% CI 1.04–21.67), and having a cystocele ≥ stage 2 (adjusted OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.89–10) were risk factors for developing POUR. Conclusions: Acute urinary retention after outpatient vaginal pelvic floor surgery can vary by procedure, but overall is 48.9%. Spinal anesthesia does not contribute to POUR, but rates are higher in those women that are younger than 55 years of age, have a cystocele ≥ stage 2 preoperatively, and a history of diabetes.
AB - Introduction and hypothesis: Spinal anesthesia has been reported to be a risk factor for postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in various surgical specialties. We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia was a risk factor for POUR after outpatient vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Methods: This was a retrospective review of an urogynecology database for all outpatient POP vaginal surgeries performed in 2014 to evaluate the risk of POUR after general versus spinal anesthesia. A standardized voiding trial was performed by backfilling the bladder with 300 ml of saline. A successful trial was achieved if the patient voided two-thirds of the total volume instilled, confirmed by bladder ultrasound. Our primary outcome was to compare POUR requiring discharge with a Foley catheter between spinal and general anesthesia. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for variables with significance at p < 0.1 at the bivariate level. Results: A total of 177 procedures were included, 126 with general and 51 with spinal anesthesia. The overall POUR rate was 48.9%. Type of anesthesia was not a risk factor for POUR. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that age < 55 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31–11.7), diabetes (adjusted OR 4.18, 95% CI 1.04–21.67), and having a cystocele ≥ stage 2 (adjusted OR 4.23, 95% CI 1.89–10) were risk factors for developing POUR. Conclusions: Acute urinary retention after outpatient vaginal pelvic floor surgery can vary by procedure, but overall is 48.9%. Spinal anesthesia does not contribute to POUR, but rates are higher in those women that are younger than 55 years of age, have a cystocele ≥ stage 2 preoperatively, and a history of diabetes.
KW - Midurethral slings
KW - Pelvic organ prolapse
KW - Post-operative urinary retention
KW - Spinal anesthesia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064070221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064070221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00192-019-03893-1
DO - 10.1007/s00192-019-03893-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 30810782
AN - SCOPUS:85064070221
SN - 0937-3462
VL - 30
SP - 1283
EP - 1289
JO - International Urogynecology Journal
JF - International Urogynecology Journal
IS - 8
ER -