TY - JOUR
T1 - Do violence dynamics matter?
AU - Katerndahl, David
AU - Burge, Sandra K
AU - Ferrer, Robert
AU - Becho, Johanna
AU - Wood, Robert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Rationale, aims and objectives: Intimate partner violence is a complex, non-linear phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to determine whether violence dynamics (pattern, degree of non-linearity, optimal non-linearity) contributed to outcomes in violent relationships. Methods: The study was conducted in six primary care clinics, enrolling 200 adult women in violent relationships. In addition to baseline and end-of-study interviews, women completed daily telephone assessments of household environment and partner violence using interactive verbal response. Three non-linearity measures of violence were computed with 'optimal' non-linearity estimated using Z-transformations. Assignment of dynamic patterns (periodic, chaotic, random) was made based upon Lyapunov exponent and correlation dimension. Outcomes across dynamic patterns were analysed using analysis of variance. In addition, stepped multiple linear regression explained factor-analysed outcomes, adjusting for demographic, childhood, mental health and marital variables; attitudinal/behavioural outcomes were also adjusted for when explaining clinical outcomes. Results: Women experiencing periodic violence recognized the importance of violence and used their active coping to seek mental health care. Those with chaotic dynamics recognized that they were not responsible, experienced fewer psychological symptoms and emotional role limitations, and did not seek help. Those experiencing random violence recognized its unpredictability and uncontrollability. Violence non-linearity predicted negative coping, positive appraisals and hope/support in regression analyses, while optimal non-linearity contributed to readiness for change and symptoms functioning. Of the nine outcomes investigated, violence non-linearity contributed to five outcomes. Conclusion: Dynamic pattern of violence, degree of violence non-linearity and optimal non-linearity correlated with several attitudinal/behavioural and clinical outcomes. Knowledge of violence dynamics may have applications when working with violent couples.
AB - Rationale, aims and objectives: Intimate partner violence is a complex, non-linear phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to determine whether violence dynamics (pattern, degree of non-linearity, optimal non-linearity) contributed to outcomes in violent relationships. Methods: The study was conducted in six primary care clinics, enrolling 200 adult women in violent relationships. In addition to baseline and end-of-study interviews, women completed daily telephone assessments of household environment and partner violence using interactive verbal response. Three non-linearity measures of violence were computed with 'optimal' non-linearity estimated using Z-transformations. Assignment of dynamic patterns (periodic, chaotic, random) was made based upon Lyapunov exponent and correlation dimension. Outcomes across dynamic patterns were analysed using analysis of variance. In addition, stepped multiple linear regression explained factor-analysed outcomes, adjusting for demographic, childhood, mental health and marital variables; attitudinal/behavioural outcomes were also adjusted for when explaining clinical outcomes. Results: Women experiencing periodic violence recognized the importance of violence and used their active coping to seek mental health care. Those with chaotic dynamics recognized that they were not responsible, experienced fewer psychological symptoms and emotional role limitations, and did not seek help. Those experiencing random violence recognized its unpredictability and uncontrollability. Violence non-linearity predicted negative coping, positive appraisals and hope/support in regression analyses, while optimal non-linearity contributed to readiness for change and symptoms functioning. Of the nine outcomes investigated, violence non-linearity contributed to five outcomes. Conclusion: Dynamic pattern of violence, degree of violence non-linearity and optimal non-linearity correlated with several attitudinal/behavioural and clinical outcomes. Knowledge of violence dynamics may have applications when working with violent couples.
KW - Battered women
KW - Domestic violence
KW - Intimate partner violence
KW - Non-linear dynamics
KW - Outcomes research
KW - Systems theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927784306&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927784306&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jep.12216
DO - 10.1111/jep.12216
M3 - Article
C2 - 24986209
AN - SCOPUS:84927784306
SN - 1356-1294
VL - 20
SP - 719
EP - 727
JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
IS - 5
ER -