Do alterations in vaginal dimensions after reconstructive pelvic surgeries affect the risk for dyspareunia?

  • Yoram Abramov
  • , Sanjay Gandhi
  • , Sylvia M. Botros
  • , Roger P. Goldberg
  • , Wendi Sherman
  • , Margaret Rurak
  • , Peter K. Sand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether changes in vaginal dimensions after transvaginal reconstructive pelvic surgeries affect the risk for postoperative dyspareunia. Study design: Charts of all sexually active patients who underwent transvaginal reconstructive pelvic surgeries in our institution between July 1998 and June 2002 with 1 year of follow-up evaluations were reviewed. Data were analyzed with the Student t, χ2, Pearson's correlation tests and a logistic regression model. Results: Two hundred twenty-eight women aged 44 to 83 years were included. Dyspareunia increased after operation (16% vs 7%; P = .001); total vaginal length (7.6 vs 8.8 cm; P = .001) and genital hiatus (2.7 vs 3.5 cm; P = .001) dimensions significantly decreased after operation, with no predilection for any specific procedure. No correlation was found between these changes in vaginal dimensions and the risk for dyspareunia. Conclusion: The prevalence of dyspareunia increases after transvaginal reconstructive pelvic surgeries. Despite a postoperative decrease in vaginal dimensions, a causal relationship between dyspareunia and changes in vaginal dimensions may not exist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1573-1577
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume192
Issue number5 SPEC. ISS.
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Dyspareunia
  • Prolapse
  • Reconstructive pelvic surgery
  • Vaginal dimension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do alterations in vaginal dimensions after reconstructive pelvic surgeries affect the risk for dyspareunia?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this