Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: A multicenter experience

Alexander Meining, Yang K. Chen, Douglas Pleskow, Peter Stevens, Raj J. Shah, Ram Chuttani, Joel Michalek, Adam Slivka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

131 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Because of the low sensitivity of current ERCP-guided tissue sampling methods, management of patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures is a challenge. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables real-time microscopic visualization of strictures during an ongoing ERCP. Objective: To document the utility, performance, and accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis compared with histopathology. Design: Prospective observational study within the framework of a multicenter registry. Setting: Five academic centers. Patients: This study involved 102 patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures. Intervention: Clinical information, ERCP findings, tissue sampling results, and pCLE videos were collected prospectively. Investigators were asked to provide a presumptive diagnosis based on pCLE during the procedure before pathology results were available. All patients received at least 30 days of follow-up until definitive diagnosis of malignancy was established or 1-year follow-up if index tissue sampling was benign. Main Outcome Measurements: Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of ERCP-guided pCLE compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition. Results: There were no pCLE-related adverse events in the study. We were able to evaluate 89 patients, of whom 40 were proven to have cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value of pCLE for detecting cancerous strictures were 98%, 67%, 71%, and 97%, respectively, compared with 45%, 100%, 100%, and 69% for index pathology. This resulted in an overall accuracy of 81% for pCLE compared with 75% for index pathology. Accuracy for combination of ERCP and pCLE was significantly higher compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition (90% vs 73%; P =.001). Limitations: Investigators had access to all relevant clinical information, which may have biased the predictive characteristics of pCLE. Conclusion: Probe-based CLE provides reliable microscopic examination and has excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value. The significantly higher accuracy of ERCP and pCLE compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition may support supplementing ERCP with pCLE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)961-968
Number of pages8
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume74
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Pathologic Constriction
Lasers
Pathology
Research Personnel
Sensitivity and Specificity
Observational Studies
Registries
Neoplasms
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • CLE
  • confocal laser endomicroscopy
  • negative-predictive value
  • NPV
  • pCLE
  • positive-predictive value
  • PPV
  • probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy : A multicenter experience. / Meining, Alexander; Chen, Yang K.; Pleskow, Douglas; Stevens, Peter; Shah, Raj J.; Chuttani, Ram; Michalek, Joel; Slivka, Adam.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 74, No. 5, 11.2011, p. 961-968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meining, Alexander ; Chen, Yang K. ; Pleskow, Douglas ; Stevens, Peter ; Shah, Raj J. ; Chuttani, Ram ; Michalek, Joel ; Slivka, Adam. / Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy : A multicenter experience. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2011 ; Vol. 74, No. 5. pp. 961-968.
@article{5e0ae13241bc460fbf3cd1c17b771d72,
title = "Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: A multicenter experience",
abstract = "Background: Because of the low sensitivity of current ERCP-guided tissue sampling methods, management of patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures is a challenge. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables real-time microscopic visualization of strictures during an ongoing ERCP. Objective: To document the utility, performance, and accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis compared with histopathology. Design: Prospective observational study within the framework of a multicenter registry. Setting: Five academic centers. Patients: This study involved 102 patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures. Intervention: Clinical information, ERCP findings, tissue sampling results, and pCLE videos were collected prospectively. Investigators were asked to provide a presumptive diagnosis based on pCLE during the procedure before pathology results were available. All patients received at least 30 days of follow-up until definitive diagnosis of malignancy was established or 1-year follow-up if index tissue sampling was benign. Main Outcome Measurements: Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of ERCP-guided pCLE compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition. Results: There were no pCLE-related adverse events in the study. We were able to evaluate 89 patients, of whom 40 were proven to have cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value of pCLE for detecting cancerous strictures were 98{\%}, 67{\%}, 71{\%}, and 97{\%}, respectively, compared with 45{\%}, 100{\%}, 100{\%}, and 69{\%} for index pathology. This resulted in an overall accuracy of 81{\%} for pCLE compared with 75{\%} for index pathology. Accuracy for combination of ERCP and pCLE was significantly higher compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition (90{\%} vs 73{\%}; P =.001). Limitations: Investigators had access to all relevant clinical information, which may have biased the predictive characteristics of pCLE. Conclusion: Probe-based CLE provides reliable microscopic examination and has excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value. The significantly higher accuracy of ERCP and pCLE compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition may support supplementing ERCP with pCLE.",
keywords = "CLE, confocal laser endomicroscopy, negative-predictive value, NPV, pCLE, positive-predictive value, PPV, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy",
author = "Alexander Meining and Chen, {Yang K.} and Douglas Pleskow and Peter Stevens and Shah, {Raj J.} and Ram Chuttani and Joel Michalek and Adam Slivka",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "961--968",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

T2 - A multicenter experience

AU - Meining, Alexander

AU - Chen, Yang K.

AU - Pleskow, Douglas

AU - Stevens, Peter

AU - Shah, Raj J.

AU - Chuttani, Ram

AU - Michalek, Joel

AU - Slivka, Adam

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Background: Because of the low sensitivity of current ERCP-guided tissue sampling methods, management of patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures is a challenge. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables real-time microscopic visualization of strictures during an ongoing ERCP. Objective: To document the utility, performance, and accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis compared with histopathology. Design: Prospective observational study within the framework of a multicenter registry. Setting: Five academic centers. Patients: This study involved 102 patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures. Intervention: Clinical information, ERCP findings, tissue sampling results, and pCLE videos were collected prospectively. Investigators were asked to provide a presumptive diagnosis based on pCLE during the procedure before pathology results were available. All patients received at least 30 days of follow-up until definitive diagnosis of malignancy was established or 1-year follow-up if index tissue sampling was benign. Main Outcome Measurements: Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of ERCP-guided pCLE compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition. Results: There were no pCLE-related adverse events in the study. We were able to evaluate 89 patients, of whom 40 were proven to have cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value of pCLE for detecting cancerous strictures were 98%, 67%, 71%, and 97%, respectively, compared with 45%, 100%, 100%, and 69% for index pathology. This resulted in an overall accuracy of 81% for pCLE compared with 75% for index pathology. Accuracy for combination of ERCP and pCLE was significantly higher compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition (90% vs 73%; P =.001). Limitations: Investigators had access to all relevant clinical information, which may have biased the predictive characteristics of pCLE. Conclusion: Probe-based CLE provides reliable microscopic examination and has excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value. The significantly higher accuracy of ERCP and pCLE compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition may support supplementing ERCP with pCLE.

AB - Background: Because of the low sensitivity of current ERCP-guided tissue sampling methods, management of patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures is a challenge. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables real-time microscopic visualization of strictures during an ongoing ERCP. Objective: To document the utility, performance, and accuracy of real-time pCLE diagnosis compared with histopathology. Design: Prospective observational study within the framework of a multicenter registry. Setting: Five academic centers. Patients: This study involved 102 patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures. Intervention: Clinical information, ERCP findings, tissue sampling results, and pCLE videos were collected prospectively. Investigators were asked to provide a presumptive diagnosis based on pCLE during the procedure before pathology results were available. All patients received at least 30 days of follow-up until definitive diagnosis of malignancy was established or 1-year follow-up if index tissue sampling was benign. Main Outcome Measurements: Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of ERCP-guided pCLE compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition. Results: There were no pCLE-related adverse events in the study. We were able to evaluate 89 patients, of whom 40 were proven to have cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive value, and negative-predictive value of pCLE for detecting cancerous strictures were 98%, 67%, 71%, and 97%, respectively, compared with 45%, 100%, 100%, and 69% for index pathology. This resulted in an overall accuracy of 81% for pCLE compared with 75% for index pathology. Accuracy for combination of ERCP and pCLE was significantly higher compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition (90% vs 73%; P =.001). Limitations: Investigators had access to all relevant clinical information, which may have biased the predictive characteristics of pCLE. Conclusion: Probe-based CLE provides reliable microscopic examination and has excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value. The significantly higher accuracy of ERCP and pCLE compared with ERCP with tissue acquisition may support supplementing ERCP with pCLE.

KW - CLE

KW - confocal laser endomicroscopy

KW - negative-predictive value

KW - NPV

KW - pCLE

KW - positive-predictive value

KW - PPV

KW - probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053596695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053596695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.009

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 21802675

AN - SCOPUS:80053596695

VL - 74

SP - 961

EP - 968

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 5

ER -