Differential diagnosis and evaluation of the incidentally discovered renal mass

Ronald Rodriguez, E. K. Fishman, F. F. Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent advances in technology, coupled with decreasing costs, have led to a substantial rise in the diagnosis of the incidentally discovered renal mass. In virtually all of these cases, the underlying signs and symptoms of an occult renal tumor were either absent or sufficiently minor as to escape the notice of the referring physician. Although the majority of the renal masses are benign renal cysts, many are indeterminate or frankly malignant. The evaluation of these tumors is typically completed with contrast-enhanced static or spiral computed tomography; however, ultrasound may be sufficient in many cases to definitively diagnose renal cysts. The size and location of these tumors often dictates treatment, and recently, less conservative management has been found to be reasonably safe and effective. For instance, small localized tumors are now being considered for tumor enucleation, heminephrectomy or partial nephrectomy, even in the presence of an otherwise normal contralateral kidney. Recent innovations, including intraoperative sonography, have given the urologic surgeon an additional tool for complete evaluation of the indeterminate renal mass. These issues are discussed in detail, in order to achieve a rational approach to the differential diagnosis and evaluation of the incidental renal mass.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)246-253
Number of pages8
JournalSeminars in Urologic Oncology
Volume13
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Differential Diagnosis
Kidney
Neoplasms
Nephrectomy
Cysts
Spiral Computed Tomography
Signs and Symptoms
Ultrasonography
Technology
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • partial nephrectomy
  • Renal mass

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Differential diagnosis and evaluation of the incidentally discovered renal mass. / Rodriguez, Ronald; Fishman, E. K.; Marshall, F. F.

In: Seminars in Urologic Oncology, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1995, p. 246-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bd22b59c212b4762a84a873b0a03cb56,
title = "Differential diagnosis and evaluation of the incidentally discovered renal mass",
abstract = "Recent advances in technology, coupled with decreasing costs, have led to a substantial rise in the diagnosis of the incidentally discovered renal mass. In virtually all of these cases, the underlying signs and symptoms of an occult renal tumor were either absent or sufficiently minor as to escape the notice of the referring physician. Although the majority of the renal masses are benign renal cysts, many are indeterminate or frankly malignant. The evaluation of these tumors is typically completed with contrast-enhanced static or spiral computed tomography; however, ultrasound may be sufficient in many cases to definitively diagnose renal cysts. The size and location of these tumors often dictates treatment, and recently, less conservative management has been found to be reasonably safe and effective. For instance, small localized tumors are now being considered for tumor enucleation, heminephrectomy or partial nephrectomy, even in the presence of an otherwise normal contralateral kidney. Recent innovations, including intraoperative sonography, have given the urologic surgeon an additional tool for complete evaluation of the indeterminate renal mass. These issues are discussed in detail, in order to achieve a rational approach to the differential diagnosis and evaluation of the incidental renal mass.",
keywords = "partial nephrectomy, Renal mass",
author = "Ronald Rodriguez and Fishman, {E. K.} and Marshall, {F. F.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "246--253",
journal = "Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations",
issn = "1078-1439",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential diagnosis and evaluation of the incidentally discovered renal mass

AU - Rodriguez, Ronald

AU - Fishman, E. K.

AU - Marshall, F. F.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Recent advances in technology, coupled with decreasing costs, have led to a substantial rise in the diagnosis of the incidentally discovered renal mass. In virtually all of these cases, the underlying signs and symptoms of an occult renal tumor were either absent or sufficiently minor as to escape the notice of the referring physician. Although the majority of the renal masses are benign renal cysts, many are indeterminate or frankly malignant. The evaluation of these tumors is typically completed with contrast-enhanced static or spiral computed tomography; however, ultrasound may be sufficient in many cases to definitively diagnose renal cysts. The size and location of these tumors often dictates treatment, and recently, less conservative management has been found to be reasonably safe and effective. For instance, small localized tumors are now being considered for tumor enucleation, heminephrectomy or partial nephrectomy, even in the presence of an otherwise normal contralateral kidney. Recent innovations, including intraoperative sonography, have given the urologic surgeon an additional tool for complete evaluation of the indeterminate renal mass. These issues are discussed in detail, in order to achieve a rational approach to the differential diagnosis and evaluation of the incidental renal mass.

AB - Recent advances in technology, coupled with decreasing costs, have led to a substantial rise in the diagnosis of the incidentally discovered renal mass. In virtually all of these cases, the underlying signs and symptoms of an occult renal tumor were either absent or sufficiently minor as to escape the notice of the referring physician. Although the majority of the renal masses are benign renal cysts, many are indeterminate or frankly malignant. The evaluation of these tumors is typically completed with contrast-enhanced static or spiral computed tomography; however, ultrasound may be sufficient in many cases to definitively diagnose renal cysts. The size and location of these tumors often dictates treatment, and recently, less conservative management has been found to be reasonably safe and effective. For instance, small localized tumors are now being considered for tumor enucleation, heminephrectomy or partial nephrectomy, even in the presence of an otherwise normal contralateral kidney. Recent innovations, including intraoperative sonography, have given the urologic surgeon an additional tool for complete evaluation of the indeterminate renal mass. These issues are discussed in detail, in order to achieve a rational approach to the differential diagnosis and evaluation of the incidental renal mass.

KW - partial nephrectomy

KW - Renal mass

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028850590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028850590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8595547

AN - SCOPUS:0028850590

VL - 13

SP - 246

EP - 253

JO - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

JF - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations

SN - 1078-1439

IS - 4

ER -