Detecting malingered performance with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A preliminary investigation in traumatic brain injury

Kevin W. Greve, Kevin J. Bianchini, Charles W. Mathias, Rebecca J. Houston, John A. Crouch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study examined the classification accuracy of four potential Wisconsin Card Sorting Test malingering indicators (Bernard and Suhr formulas and two types of Unique responses). Participants were 89 traumatic brain-injury (TBI) patients assigned to malingering and nonmalingering groups on the basis of the Slick, Sherman, and Iversion (1999) criteria. Individual Sensitivities were greater than .33 with acceptable Specificity. Combined Sensitivity for two of the indicators was greater than .60. Overall, this study demonstrated three distinct approaches to the WCST used by probable malingerers. The clinical relevance of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-191
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Detecting malingered performance with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A preliminary investigation in traumatic brain injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this