TY - JOUR
T1 - Dentist material selection for single-unit crowns
T2 - Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network
AU - National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group
AU - Makhija, Sonia K.
AU - Lawson, Nathaniel C.
AU - Gilbert, Gregg H.
AU - Litaker, Mark S.
AU - McClelland, Jocelyn A.
AU - Louis, David R.
AU - Gordan, Valeria V.
AU - Pihlstrom, Daniel J.
AU - Meyerowitz, Cyril
AU - Mungia, Rahma
AU - McCracken, Michael S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NIH grant U19-DE-22516. An Internet site devoted to details about the nation's network is located at http://NationalDentalPBRN.org. We are very grateful to the network's Regional Coordinators who followed-up with network dentists to improve the response rate (Midwest Region: Tracy Shea, RDH, BSDH; Western Region: Stephanie Hodge, MA; Northeast Region: Christine O'Brien, RDH; South Atlantic Region: Hanna Knopf, BA, Deborah McEdward, RDH, BS, CCRP; South Central Region: Claudia Carcelén, MPH, Shermetria Massengale, MPH, CHES, Ellen Sowell, BA; Southwest Region: Stephanie Reyes, BA, Meredith Buchberg, MPH, Colleen Dolan, MPH). Opinions and assertions contained herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as necessarily representing the views of the respective organizations or the National Institutes of Health. The informed consent of all human subjects who participated in this investigation was obtained after the nature of the procedures had been explained fully.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Objectives Dentists enrolled in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network completed a study questionnaire about techniques and materials used for single-unit crowns and an enrollment questionnaire about dentist/practice characteristics. The objectives were to quantify dentists’ material recommendations and test the hypothesis that dentist's and practice's characteristics are significantly associated with these recommendations. Methods Surveyed dentists responded to a contextual scenario asking what material they would use for a single-unit crown on an anterior and posterior tooth. Material choices included: full metal, porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM), all-zirconia, layered zirconia, lithium disilicate, leucite-reinforced ceramic, or other. Results 1777 of 2132 eligible dentists responded (83%). The top 3 choices for anterior crowns were lithium disilicate (54%), layered zirconia (17%), and leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (13%). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) by dentist's gender, race, years since graduation, practice type, region, practice busyness, hours worked/week, and location type. The top 3 choices for posterior crowns were all-zirconia (32%), PFM (31%), and lithium disilicate (21%). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) by dentist's gender, practice type, region, practice busyness, insurance coverage, hours worked/week, and location type. Conclusions Network dentists use a broad range of materials for single-unit crowns for anterior and posterior teeth, adopting newer materials into their practices as they become available. Material choices are significantly associated with dentist's and practice's characteristics. Clinical significance Decisions for crown material may be influenced by factors unrelated to tooth and patient variables. Dentists should be cognizant of this when developing an evidence-based approach to selecting crown material.
AB - Objectives Dentists enrolled in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network completed a study questionnaire about techniques and materials used for single-unit crowns and an enrollment questionnaire about dentist/practice characteristics. The objectives were to quantify dentists’ material recommendations and test the hypothesis that dentist's and practice's characteristics are significantly associated with these recommendations. Methods Surveyed dentists responded to a contextual scenario asking what material they would use for a single-unit crown on an anterior and posterior tooth. Material choices included: full metal, porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM), all-zirconia, layered zirconia, lithium disilicate, leucite-reinforced ceramic, or other. Results 1777 of 2132 eligible dentists responded (83%). The top 3 choices for anterior crowns were lithium disilicate (54%), layered zirconia (17%), and leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (13%). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) by dentist's gender, race, years since graduation, practice type, region, practice busyness, hours worked/week, and location type. The top 3 choices for posterior crowns were all-zirconia (32%), PFM (31%), and lithium disilicate (21%). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) by dentist's gender, practice type, region, practice busyness, insurance coverage, hours worked/week, and location type. Conclusions Network dentists use a broad range of materials for single-unit crowns for anterior and posterior teeth, adopting newer materials into their practices as they become available. Material choices are significantly associated with dentist's and practice's characteristics. Clinical significance Decisions for crown material may be influenced by factors unrelated to tooth and patient variables. Dentists should be cognizant of this when developing an evidence-based approach to selecting crown material.
KW - Crowns
KW - Dental materials
KW - Dentistry
KW - Prosthodontics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006248579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006248579&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 27693778
AN - SCOPUS:85006248579
SN - 0300-5712
VL - 55
SP - 40
EP - 47
JO - Journal of Dentistry
JF - Journal of Dentistry
ER -