Delay discounting of food and remifentanil in rhesus monkeys

David R. Maguire, Lisa R Gerak, Charles P France

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Drug abuse can be conceptualized as choice between drug and nondrug reinforcers in which drug choice is excessive; factors impacting drug taking can be examined using procedures in which subjects choose between drug and an alternative reinforcer. Objective: This experiment examined the effects of delayed reinforcement on choice between food and the mu-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil. Methods: Rhesus monkeys responded under a concurrent fixed-ratio 5, fixed-ratio 5 schedule in which responding on one lever delivered one food pellet and responding on another lever delivered an i.v. infusion. Results: With no delay, monkeys responded predominantly for food rather than saline or small doses of remifentanil; as the dose of remifentanil increased (0.1-1.0 μg/kg/infusion), monkeys responded more for drug. Delaying delivery (30-240 s) of 0.32 and not 1.0 μg/kg/infusion of remifentanil (food delivered immediately) decreased responding for drug and increased responding for food, resulting in a rightward shift in the remifentanil dose-effect curve. Delaying delivery of food (60-240 s) when doses of remifentanil smaller than 0.32 μg/kg/infusion (but not saline) were available decreased responding for food and increased responding for drug, resulting in a leftward shift in the remifentanil dose-effect curve. Conclusion: These results provide evidence that delaying the delivery of a mu-opioid receptor agonist reduces its potency as a positive reinforcer; more importantly, delaying the delivery of an alternative nondrug reinforcer (e.g., food) enhances the reinforcing potency of the agonist. Thus, understanding the factors that control substance abuse requires examination of contingencies for both drug and nondrug reinforcers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-330
Number of pages8
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume229
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Macaca mulatta
Food
Pharmaceutical Preparations
mu Opioid Receptor
Substance-Related Disorders
Haplorhini
remifentanil
Delay Discounting
Appointments and Schedules

Keywords

  • Choice
  • Delay discounting
  • Food
  • Opioid
  • Remifentanil
  • Rhesus monkey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Delay discounting of food and remifentanil in rhesus monkeys. / Maguire, David R.; Gerak, Lisa R; France, Charles P.

In: Psychopharmacology, Vol. 229, No. 2, 09.2013, p. 323-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maguire, David R. ; Gerak, Lisa R ; France, Charles P. / Delay discounting of food and remifentanil in rhesus monkeys. In: Psychopharmacology. 2013 ; Vol. 229, No. 2. pp. 323-330.
@article{cbfd4d9132b0491ca1fe2ccc100a48b5,
title = "Delay discounting of food and remifentanil in rhesus monkeys",
abstract = "Rationale: Drug abuse can be conceptualized as choice between drug and nondrug reinforcers in which drug choice is excessive; factors impacting drug taking can be examined using procedures in which subjects choose between drug and an alternative reinforcer. Objective: This experiment examined the effects of delayed reinforcement on choice between food and the mu-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil. Methods: Rhesus monkeys responded under a concurrent fixed-ratio 5, fixed-ratio 5 schedule in which responding on one lever delivered one food pellet and responding on another lever delivered an i.v. infusion. Results: With no delay, monkeys responded predominantly for food rather than saline or small doses of remifentanil; as the dose of remifentanil increased (0.1-1.0 μg/kg/infusion), monkeys responded more for drug. Delaying delivery (30-240 s) of 0.32 and not 1.0 μg/kg/infusion of remifentanil (food delivered immediately) decreased responding for drug and increased responding for food, resulting in a rightward shift in the remifentanil dose-effect curve. Delaying delivery of food (60-240 s) when doses of remifentanil smaller than 0.32 μg/kg/infusion (but not saline) were available decreased responding for food and increased responding for drug, resulting in a leftward shift in the remifentanil dose-effect curve. Conclusion: These results provide evidence that delaying the delivery of a mu-opioid receptor agonist reduces its potency as a positive reinforcer; more importantly, delaying the delivery of an alternative nondrug reinforcer (e.g., food) enhances the reinforcing potency of the agonist. Thus, understanding the factors that control substance abuse requires examination of contingencies for both drug and nondrug reinforcers.",
keywords = "Choice, Delay discounting, Food, Opioid, Remifentanil, Rhesus monkey",
author = "Maguire, {David R.} and Gerak, {Lisa R} and France, {Charles P}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00213-013-3121-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "229",
pages = "323--330",
journal = "Psychopharmacology",
issn = "0033-3158",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delay discounting of food and remifentanil in rhesus monkeys

AU - Maguire, David R.

AU - Gerak, Lisa R

AU - France, Charles P

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Rationale: Drug abuse can be conceptualized as choice between drug and nondrug reinforcers in which drug choice is excessive; factors impacting drug taking can be examined using procedures in which subjects choose between drug and an alternative reinforcer. Objective: This experiment examined the effects of delayed reinforcement on choice between food and the mu-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil. Methods: Rhesus monkeys responded under a concurrent fixed-ratio 5, fixed-ratio 5 schedule in which responding on one lever delivered one food pellet and responding on another lever delivered an i.v. infusion. Results: With no delay, monkeys responded predominantly for food rather than saline or small doses of remifentanil; as the dose of remifentanil increased (0.1-1.0 μg/kg/infusion), monkeys responded more for drug. Delaying delivery (30-240 s) of 0.32 and not 1.0 μg/kg/infusion of remifentanil (food delivered immediately) decreased responding for drug and increased responding for food, resulting in a rightward shift in the remifentanil dose-effect curve. Delaying delivery of food (60-240 s) when doses of remifentanil smaller than 0.32 μg/kg/infusion (but not saline) were available decreased responding for food and increased responding for drug, resulting in a leftward shift in the remifentanil dose-effect curve. Conclusion: These results provide evidence that delaying the delivery of a mu-opioid receptor agonist reduces its potency as a positive reinforcer; more importantly, delaying the delivery of an alternative nondrug reinforcer (e.g., food) enhances the reinforcing potency of the agonist. Thus, understanding the factors that control substance abuse requires examination of contingencies for both drug and nondrug reinforcers.

AB - Rationale: Drug abuse can be conceptualized as choice between drug and nondrug reinforcers in which drug choice is excessive; factors impacting drug taking can be examined using procedures in which subjects choose between drug and an alternative reinforcer. Objective: This experiment examined the effects of delayed reinforcement on choice between food and the mu-opioid receptor agonist remifentanil. Methods: Rhesus monkeys responded under a concurrent fixed-ratio 5, fixed-ratio 5 schedule in which responding on one lever delivered one food pellet and responding on another lever delivered an i.v. infusion. Results: With no delay, monkeys responded predominantly for food rather than saline or small doses of remifentanil; as the dose of remifentanil increased (0.1-1.0 μg/kg/infusion), monkeys responded more for drug. Delaying delivery (30-240 s) of 0.32 and not 1.0 μg/kg/infusion of remifentanil (food delivered immediately) decreased responding for drug and increased responding for food, resulting in a rightward shift in the remifentanil dose-effect curve. Delaying delivery of food (60-240 s) when doses of remifentanil smaller than 0.32 μg/kg/infusion (but not saline) were available decreased responding for food and increased responding for drug, resulting in a leftward shift in the remifentanil dose-effect curve. Conclusion: These results provide evidence that delaying the delivery of a mu-opioid receptor agonist reduces its potency as a positive reinforcer; more importantly, delaying the delivery of an alternative nondrug reinforcer (e.g., food) enhances the reinforcing potency of the agonist. Thus, understanding the factors that control substance abuse requires examination of contingencies for both drug and nondrug reinforcers.

KW - Choice

KW - Delay discounting

KW - Food

KW - Opioid

KW - Remifentanil

KW - Rhesus monkey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883464360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883464360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00213-013-3121-x

DO - 10.1007/s00213-013-3121-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23636304

AN - SCOPUS:84883464360

VL - 229

SP - 323

EP - 330

JO - Psychopharmacology

JF - Psychopharmacology

SN - 0033-3158

IS - 2

ER -